Literature DB >> 19425675

Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech.

Jean C Krause1, Louis D Braida.   

Abstract

In adverse listening conditions, talkers can increase their intelligibility by speaking clearly [Picheny, M.A., et al. (1985). J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 96-103; Payton, K. L., et al. (1994). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1581-1592]. This modified speaking style, known as clear speech, is typically spoken more slowly than conversational speech [Picheny, M. A., et al. (1986). J. Speech Hear. Res. 29, 434-446; Uchanski, R. M., et al. (1996). J. Speech Hear. Res. 39, 494-509]. However, talkers can produce clear speech at normal rates (clear/normal speech) with training [Krause, J. C., and Braida, L. D. (2002). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2165-2172] suggesting that clear speech has some inherent acoustic properties, independent of rate, that contribute to its improved intelligibility. Identifying these acoustic properties could lead to improved signal processing schemes for hearing aids. Two global-level properties of clear/normal speech that appear likely to be associated with improved intelligibility are increased energy in the 1000-3000-Hz range of long-term spectra and increased modulation depth of low-frequency modulations of the intensity envelope [Krause, J. C., and Braida, L. D. (2004). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 362-378]. In an attempt to isolate the contributions of these two properties to intelligibility, signal processing transformations were developed to manipulate each of these aspects of conversational speech independently. Results of intelligibility testing with hearing-impaired listeners and normal-hearing listeners in noise suggest that (1) increasing energy between 1000 and 3000 Hz does not fully account for the intelligibility benefit of clear/normal speech, and (2) simple filtering of the intensity envelope is generally detrimental to intelligibility. While other manipulations of the intensity envelope are required to determine conclusively the role of this factor in intelligibility, it is also likely that additional properties important for highly intelligible speech at normal speech at normal rates remain to be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19425675      PMCID: PMC2806443          DOI: 10.1121/1.3097491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: the effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility.

Authors:  Jean C Krause; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates.

Authors:  Jean C Krause; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal properties in clear speech perception.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  M A Picheny; N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-12

5.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid.

Authors:  D Byrne; H Dillon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55.

Authors:  T W Tillman; R Carhart
Journal:  Tech Rep SAM-TR       Date:  1966-06

7.  The effect of varying the slope of the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences.

Authors:  J N van Dijkhuizen; P C Anema; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  M A Picheny; N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-03

9.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  16 in total

1.  Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to investigate the source of increased intelligibility in speakers with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Alexander Kain; Jennifer Lam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Acoustic-perceptual relationships in variants of clear speech.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 0.849

3.  Age-related changes in envelope-following responses at equalized peripheral or central activation.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Alexandra L Sommer; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Amplitude modulation transfer functions reveal opposing populations within both the inferior colliculus and medial geniculate body.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Laurel Carney; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Kristin Van Engen; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Speech produced in noise: Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustic and durational parameters.

Authors:  Simone Graetzer; Pasquale Bottalico; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic correlates of vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Hugo Quené
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intelligibility of clear speech: effect of instruction.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Acoustics of clear speech: effect of instruction.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden; Greg Wilding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Relationship between acoustic measures and judgments of intelligibility in Parkinson's disease: a within-speaker approach.

Authors:  Lynda Feenaughty; Kris Tjaden; Joan Sussman
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 1.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.