Literature DB >> 19562041

A new method for eliciting three speaking styles in the laboratory.

James D Harnsberger1, Richard Wright, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

In this study, a method was developed to elicit three different speaking styles, reduced, citation, and hyperarticulated, using controlled sentence materials in a laboratory setting. In the first set of experiments, the reduced style was elicited by having twelve talkers read a sentence while carrying out a distractor task that involved recalling from short-term memory an individually-calibrated number of digits. The citation style corresponded to read speech in the laboratory. The hyperarticulated style was elicited by prompting talkers (twice) to reread the sentences more carefully. The results of perceptual tests with naïve listeners and an acoustic analysis showed that six of the twelve talkers produced a reduced style of speech for the test sentences in the distractor task relative to the same sentences in the citation style condition. In addition, all talkers consistently produced sentences in the citation and hyperarticulated styles. In the second set of experiments, the reduced style was elicited by increasing the number of digits in the distractor task by one (a heavier cognitive load). The procedures for eliciting citation and hyperarticulated sentences remained unchanged. Ten talkers were recorded in the second experiment. The results showed that six out of ten talkers differentiated all three styles as predicted (70% of all sentences recorded). In addition, all talkers consistently produced sentences in the citation and hyperarticulated styles. Overall, the results demonstrate that it is possible to elicit controlled sentence stimulus materials varying in speaking style in a laboratory setting, although the method requires further refinement to elicit these styles more consistently from individual participants.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19562041      PMCID: PMC2701715          DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2007.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Speech Commun        ISSN: 0167-6393            Impact factor:   2.017


  19 in total

1.  Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02

2.  The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Matthew Aylett; Alice Turk
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Role of articulation in speech perception: clues from production.

Authors:  B Lindblom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki; R I Pedlow; M A Stokes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of stimulus variability on perception and representation of spoken words in memory.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; M S Sommers; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-10

8.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate.

Authors:  R M Uchanski; S S Choi; L D Braida; C M Reed; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-06

9.  Modeling global and focal hyperarticulation during human-computer error resolution.

Authors:  S Oviatt; G A Levow; E Moreton; M MacEachern
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  K L Payton; R M Uchanski; L D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Acoustic-perceptual relationships in variants of clear speech.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 0.849

2.  Interaction and representational integration: evidence from speech errors.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; H Ross Baker; Amanda Murphy; Melissa Baese-Berk
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-06-12

3.  Intelligibility of clear speech: effect of instruction.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Speaking and Hearing Clearly: Talker and Listener Factors in Speaking Style Changes.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2009-01-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.