Literature DB >> 23862838

Evidence that the Lombard effect is frequency-specific in humans.

Lauren M Stowe1, Edward J Golob.   

Abstract

Recent perspectives suggest that the Lombard effect is an increase in the suprasegmental speech parameters of vocal intensity, duration, and fundamental frequency in the presence of noise. It has been viewed as a non-specific response to ambient noise, but this assumption has not been thoroughly tested. Two experiments using healthy adults measured intensity, duration, and F0 changes in broadband (0.2-20 kHz) and notched noise (0.05-4 kHz removed) during a picture naming task. The pilot experiment showed that broadband noise containing speech-similar frequencies significantly increased intensity, duration, and F0 while notched noise, which removed the majority of speech-similar frequencies, had no effect. The main experiment added bandpass noise (0.05-4.0 kHz) which contained a major portion of speech-similar frequencies and was the mirror image of the notched noise. Broadband and notched noise results were replicated. Bandpass noise increased intensity and duration, but to a lesser degree than did broadband noise, and had no effect on F0. Findings show that the Lombard effect is sensitive to frequencies vital for speech and is not a general response to any competing sound in the environment. Implications for suprasegmental control of speech are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23862838      PMCID: PMC3985863          DOI: 10.1121/1.4807645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 2.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Observations of the relationship between noise exposure and preschool teacher voice usage in day-care center environments.

Authors:  Fredric Lindstrom; Kerstin Persson Waye; Maria Södersten; Anita McAllister; Sten Ternström
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Loudness adaptation and excitation patterns: effects of frequency and level.

Authors:  R Hellman; A Miśkiewicz; B Scharf
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki; R I Pedlow; M A Stokes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Audio-vocal interaction in the pontine brainstem during self-initiated vocalization in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Uwe Jürgens; Günter Ehret
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River Beluga.

Authors:  P M Scheifele; S Andrew; R A Cooper; M Darre; F E Musiek; L Max
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Speech production as state feedback control.

Authors:  John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Vowel and Sibilant Production in Noise: Effects of Noise Frequency and Phonological Similarity.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The effects of Lombard perturbation on speech intelligibility in noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Juliana N Saba; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Impact of Noise in Operating Theater: A Surgeon's and Anesthesiologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Pritika Srivastava; Premalatha Shetty; Sameep Shetty; Madhusudan Upadya; Aditya Nandan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  Noise-Induced Frequency Modifications of Tamarin Vocalizations: Implications for Noise Compensation in Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Cara F Hotchkin; Susan E Parks; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Neural Correlates of Vocal Auditory Feedback Processing: Unique Insights from Electrocorticography Recordings in a Human Cochlear Implant User.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Christine P Etler; Kirill V Nourski; Richard A Reale; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-01-28

6.  Moderate evidence for a Lombard effect in a phylogenetically basal primate.

Authors:  Christian Schopf; Sabine Schmidt; Elke Zimmermann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.