Literature DB >> 24687476

Children's perception of speech produced in a two-talker background.

Mallory Baker, Emily Buss, Adam Jacks, Crystal Taylor, Lori J Leibold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the degree to which children benefit from the acoustic modifications made by talkers when they produce speech in noise.
METHOD: A repeated measures design compared the speech perception performance of children (5-11 years) and adults in a 2-talker masker. Target speech was produced in a 2-talker background or in quiet. In Experiment 1, recognition with the 2 target sets was assessed using an adaptive spondee identification procedure. In Experiment 2, the benefit of speech produced in a 2-talker background was assessed using an open-set, monosyllabic word recognition task at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
RESULTS: Children performed more poorly than adults, regardless of whether the target speech was produced in quiet or in a 2-talker background. A small improvement in the SNR required to identify spondees was observed for both children and adults using speech produced in a 2-talker background (Experiment 1). Similarly, average open-set word recognition scores were 11 percentage points higher for both age groups using speech produced in a 2-talker background compared with quiet (Experiment 2).
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that children can use the acoustic modifications of speech produced in a 2-talker background to improve masked speech perception, as previously demonstrated for adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24687476      PMCID: PMC4481168          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0287)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  29 in total

1.  Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; John H Grose; Emily Buss; Madhu B Dev
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Normative data for the Words-in-Noise Test for 6- to 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Nicole M Farmer; Avni Gandhi; Emily Shelburne; Jamie Weaver
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.

Authors:  Youyi Lu; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Nonmonotonicity of informational masking.

Authors:  E L Oh; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki; R I Pedlow; M A Stokes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers.

Authors:  J C Junqua
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

8.  The effects of multitalker and masker noise on fundamental frequency variability during spontaneous speech for children and adults.

Authors:  C Rivers; M P Rastatter
Journal:  J Aud Res       Date:  1985-01

9.  Children's understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  L L Elliott; S Connors; E Kille; S Levin; K Ball; D Katz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  6 in total

1.  Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Amanda M Griffin; Sarah F Poissant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Linguistic Masking Release in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Jenna Browning; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  The Clear-Speech Benefit for School-Age Children: Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effect of Simultaneous Bilingualism on Speech Intelligibility across Different Masker Types, Modalities, and Signal-to-Noise Ratios in School-Age Children.

Authors:  Rachel Reetzke; Boji Pak-Wing Lam; Zilong Xie; Li Sheng; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Relationship Between Spectral Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition: Adult Versus Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Stephen M Camarata; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Robert T Dwyer; Benoit M Dawant; Mary S Dietrich; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.