Literature DB >> 31812699

Differences in geometric strength at the contralateral hip between men with hip fracture and non-fractured comparators.

Alan M Rathbun1, Jay Magaziner2, Michelle D Shardell2, Thomas J Beck3, Laura M Yerges-Armstrong4, Denise Orwig2, Gregory E Hicks5, Alice S Ryan6, Marc C Hochberg6.   

Abstract

Older men sustain excess bone mineral density (BMD) declines after hip fracture; however, BMD provides no information on mechanical structure and strength. The aim was to assess whether changes in hip bone geometry in older men after hip fracture differ than that expected with aging. Two cohorts were used: Baltimore Hip Studies 7th cohort (BHS-7) and Baltimore Men's Osteoporosis Study (MOST). The sample (N = 170) included older Caucasian men with hip fracture that were propensity score matched (1:1) to community-dwelling non-fractured comparators. Hip Structural Analysis (HSA) calculated aerial BMD and metrics of bone structural strength: cross-sectional bone area (CSA), cortical outer diameter (OD), section modulus (SM), and centroid position (CP). Mixed-effect models estimated changes in HSA parameters and adjusted robust regression models evaluated between-cohort differences in annual percent change at the narrow neck (NN), intertrochanteric (IT), and femoral shaft (FS). Hip fracture was associated with statistically greater declines in NN CSA (β = -2.818; 95% CI: -3.300%, -2.336%), SM (β = -1.896%; 95% CI: -2.711%, -1.080%) and CP (β = -0.884%; 95% CI: -0.889%, -0.880%) and significantly larger increases in NN OD (β = 0.187%; 95% CI: 0.185%, 0.190%). Differences in IT HSA parameters were like the NN but larger in magnitude, while there were favorable changes in FS geometry where fragility fractures are rare. Findings indicate there are declines in bone structure and strength at the NN and IT regions of the proximal femur in older men during hip fracture recovery that far exceed what occurs during normal aging.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; DXA; Fracture prevention; Injury/fracture healing; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31812699      PMCID: PMC7037571          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  24 in total

1.  Trabecular eccentricity and bone adaptation.

Authors:  J C Fox; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Measurement of Hip Geometry-Technical Background.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Susan B Broy
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 3.  Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Older men who sustain a hip fracture experience greater declines in bone mineral density at the contralateral hip than non-fractured comparators.

Authors:  A M Rathbun; J Magaziner; M D Shardell; L M Yerges-Armstrong; D Orwig; G E Hicks; M C Hochberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Racial differences in rate of decline in bone mass in older men: the Baltimore men's osteoporosis study.

Authors:  J Kathleen Tracy; Walter A Meyer; Raymond H Flores; P David Wilson; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Women with hip fracture experience greater loss of geometric strength in the contralateral hip during the year following fracture than age-matched controls.

Authors:  L Reider; T J Beck; M C Hochberg; W G Hawkes; D Orwig; J A YuYahiro; J R Hebel; J Magaziner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Effects of Prefracture Depressive Illness and Postfracture Depressive Symptoms on Physical Performance After Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Glenn Ostir; Gregory E Hicks; Ram R Miller; Marc C Hochberg; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Stephen Kaptoge; Thomas J Beck; Jonathan Reeve; Katie L Stone; Teresa A Hillier; Jane A Cauley; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  A Review of Osteoporosis in the Older Adult: An Update.

Authors:  Paloma Alejandro; Florina Constantinescu
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Differences in the trajectory of bone mineral density change measured at the total hip and femoral neck between men and women following hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas Beck; Marc C Hochberg; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.