Literature DB >> 26277850

Measurement of Hip Geometry-Technical Background.

Thomas J Beck1, Susan B Broy2.   

Abstract

Conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images display a digital projection of the inorganic mineral mass in a scanned region. Bone mineral density software generates an average of the pixels within one or more regions. Although not used in the conventional analysis, the images also contain dimensional information limited to the plane of the image. The hip structure analysis method and that of the similar GE, Madison, WI, algorithm Advanced Hip Analysis use both the dimensional information and the mineral mass data to compute the types of dimensional properties (i.e., geometry) that are used to evaluate mechanical strength in engineering analyses. This article describes the hip structure analysis method and a somewhat cruder geometry approximation that does not require a reanalysis of the image. Limitations of the methods are discussed.
Copyright © 2015 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bone strength; DXA-based engineering analysis; femur geometry; hip structural analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26277850     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  18 in total

1.  Meta-Analysis of Genomewide Association Studies Reveals Genetic Variants for Hip Bone Geometry.

Authors:  Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Karol Estrada; Evangelos Evangelou; Cheryl Ackert-Bicknell; Kristina Akesson; Thomas Beck; Suzanne J Brown; Terence Capellini; Laura Carbone; Jane Cauley; Ching-Lung Cheung; Steven R Cummings; Stefan Czerwinski; Serkalem Demissie; Michael Econs; Daniel Evans; Charles Farber; Kaare Gautvik; Tamara Harris; Candace Kammerer; John Kemp; Daniel L Koller; Annie Kung; Debbie Lawlor; Miryoung Lee; Mattias Lorentzon; Fiona McGuigan; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Braxton Mitchell; Anne Newman; Carrie Nielson; Claes Ohlsson; Munro Peacock; Sjur Reppe; J Brent Richards; John Robbins; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Timothy D Spector; Kari Stefansson; Elizabeth Streeten; Unnur Styrkarsdottir; Jonathan Tobias; Katerina Trajanoska; André Uitterlinden; Liesbeth Vandenput; Scott G Wilson; Laura Yerges-Armstrong; Mariel Young; M Carola Zillikens; Fernando Rivadeneira; Douglas P Kiel; David Karasik
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Micro-Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur on the Basis of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Longitudinal changes in hip geometry in relation to the final menstrual period: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Nayana Nagaraj; Robert M Boudreau; Michelle E Danielson; Gail A Greendale; Arun S Karlamangla; Thomas J Beck; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Physical Activity for Strengthening Fracture Prone Regions of the Proximal Femur.

Authors:  Robyn K Fuchs; Mariana E Kersh; Julio Carballido-Gamio; William R Thompson; Joyce H Keyak; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Bone mineral density and estimated hip strength in men with anorexia nervosa, atypical anorexia nervosa and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder.

Authors:  Melanie Schorr; Anne Drabkin; Micol S Rothman; Erinne Meenaghan; Gillian T Lashen; Margherita Mascolo; Ashlie Watters; Tara M Holmes; Kate Santoso; Elaine W Yu; Madhusmita Misra; Kamryn T Eddy; Anne Klibanski; Philip Mehler; Karen K Miller
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 6.  Food Versus Pharmacy: Assessment of Nutritional and Pharmacological Strategies to Improve Bone Health in Energy-Deficient Exercising Women.

Authors:  Emily A Southmayd; Adelaide C Hellmers; Mary Jane De Souza
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Differences in geometric strength at the contralateral hip between men with hip fracture and non-fractured comparators.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Jay Magaziner; Michelle D Shardell; Thomas J Beck; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong; Denise Orwig; Gregory E Hicks; Alice S Ryan; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Difference in the trajectory of change in bone geometry as measured by hip structural analysis in the narrow neck, intertrochanteric region, and femoral shaft between men and women following hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas J Beck; Jay Magaziner; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Comparison of hip structure analysis and grip strength between femoral neck and basicervical fractures.

Authors:  Yong-Han Cha; Jun-Il Yoo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Hip Structural Analysis Reveals Impaired Hip Geometry in Girls With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Taïsha V Joseph; Signe Caksa; Madhusmita Misra; Deborah M Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.