Literature DB >> 17521505

Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis.

Thomas J Beck1.   

Abstract

The hip structure analysis (HSA) method was introduced to extract geometric strength information from archived hip dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans acquired in large research studies. Research has shown that strength effects are not easily inferred from conventional DXA measures, so there is growing interest in the clinical community in more direct evaluation of bone strength in patients. This article reviews the factors that govern the strength of an object, how they are used in engineering simulations, and how those properties can be extracted from DXA data. It is important to recognize that that although DXA scanners can be used to measure geometric strength, they were not designed to do so. The current HSA method is fundamentally limited to evaluating bending strength in the plane of the image, so precision is sensitive to consistent femur positioning. The positioning issue and other limitations of the HSA method are discussed, as well as the critical importance of body-size scaling when interpreting bone geometry. Also discussed is how current HSA limitations could be ameliorated in a "next-generation" DXA scanner that is optimized for the purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17521505     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-007-0002-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  25 in total

1.  Proximal femur bone geometry is appropriately adapted to lean mass in overweight children and adolescents.

Authors:  Moira A Petit; Thomas J Beck; Justine Shults; Babette S Zemel; Bethany J Foster; Mary B Leonard
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  How is the indentation modulus of bone tissue related to its macroscopic elastic response? A validation study.

Authors:  S Hengsberger; J Enstroem; F Peyrin; Ph Zysset
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Structure of the femoral neck in hip fracture: cortical bone loss in the inferoanterior to superoposterior axis.

Authors:  K L Bell; N Loveridge; J Power; N Garrahan; M Stanton; M Lunt; B F Meggitt; J Reeve
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Age trends in femur stresses from a simulated fall on the hip among men and women: evidence of homeostatic adaptation underlying the decline in hip BMD.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Anne C Looker; Firas Mourtada; Maithili M Daphtary; Christopher B Ruff
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Paul M Mayhew; C David Thomas; John G Clement; Nigel Loveridge; Thomas J Beck; William Bonfield; Chris J Burgoyne; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jul 9-15       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure.

Authors:  R W McCalden; J A McGeough; M B Barker; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  R B Martin; D B Burr
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Alendronate increases bone strength by increasing the mean degree of mineralization of bone tissue in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  G Y Boivin; P M Chavassieux; A C Santora; J Yates; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  C C Glüer; S R Cummings; A Pressman; J Li; K Glüer; K G Faulkner; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Hip section modulus, a measure of bending resistance, is more strongly related to reported physical activity than BMD.

Authors:  S Kaptoge; N Dalzell; R W Jakes; N Wareham; N E Day; K T Khaw; T J Beck; N Loveridge; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  60 in total

1.  Age-specific reference values of hip geometric indices from a representative sample of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.

Authors:  M Iki; N DongMei; J Tamaki; Y Sato; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone geometry profiles in women with and without SLE.

Authors:  Jimmy D Alele; Diane L Kamen; Kelly J Hunt; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Targeted exercises against hip fragility.

Authors:  R Nikander; P Kannus; P Dastidar; M Hannula; L Harrison; T Cervinka; N G Narra; R Aktour; T Arola; H Eskola; S Soimakallio; A Heinonen; J Hyttinen; H Sievänen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Does lean tissue mass accrual during adolescence influence bone structural strength at the proximal femur in young adulthood?

Authors:  S A Jackowski; J L Lanovaz; C Van Oort; A D G Baxter-Jones
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 6.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Predictive ability of novel volumetric and geometric indices derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric images of the proximal femur for hip fracture compared with conventional areal bone mineral density: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Authors:  M Iki; R Winzenrieth; J Tamaki; Y Sato; N Dongmei; E Kajita; K Kouda; A Yura; T Tachiki; K Kamiya; S Kagamimori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Impact of sleeve gastrectomy on hip structural analysis in adolescents and young adults with obesity.

Authors:  Madhusmita Misra; Abisayo Animashaun; Amita Bose; Vibha Singhal; Fatima Cody Stanford; Brian Carmine; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  C-reactive protein, bone strength, and nine-year fracture risk: data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Jane A Cauley; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Michelle E Danielson; Yasuyoshi Ouchi; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Difference in the trajectory of change in bone geometry as measured by hip structural analysis in the narrow neck, intertrochanteric region, and femoral shaft between men and women following hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas J Beck; Jay Magaziner; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.