Literature DB >> 19572093

Women with hip fracture experience greater loss of geometric strength in the contralateral hip during the year following fracture than age-matched controls.

L Reider1, T J Beck, M C Hochberg, W G Hawkes, D Orwig, J A YuYahiro, J R Hebel, J Magaziner.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study examined femur geometry underlying previously observed decline in BMD of the contralateral hip in older women the year following hip fracture compared to non-fractured controls. Compared to controls, these women experienced a greater decline in indices of bone structural strength, potentially increasing the risk of a second fracture.
INTRODUCTION: This study examined the femur geometry underlying previously observed decline in BMD of the contralateral hip in the year following hip fracture compared to non-fractured controls.
METHODS: Geometry was derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan images using hip structural analysis from women in the third cohort of the Baltimore Hip Studies and from women in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Change in BMD, section modulus (SM), cross-sectional area (CSA), outer diameter, and buckling ratio (BR) at the narrow neck (NN), intertrochanteric (IT), and shaft (S) regions of the hip were compared.
RESULTS: Wider bones and reduced CSA underlie the significantly lower BMD observed in women who fractured their hip resulting in more fragile bones expressed by a lower SM and higher BR. Compared to controls, these women experienced a significantly greater decline in CSA (-2.3% vs. -0.2%NN, -3.2% vs. -0.5%IT), SM (-2.1% vs. -0.2%NN, -3.9% vs. -0.6%IT), and BMD (-3.0% vs. -0.8%NN, -3.3% vs. -0.6%IT, -2.3% vs. -0.2%S) and a greater increase in BR (5.0% vs. 2.1%NN, 6.0% vs. 1.3%IT, 4.4% vs. 1.0%S) and shaft outer diameter (0.9% vs. 0.1%).
CONCLUSION: The contralateral femur continued to weaken during the year following fracture, potentially increasing the risk of a second fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19572093      PMCID: PMC2847041          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1000-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  36 in total

Review 1.  Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Short time-frame from first to second hip fracture in the Funen County Hip Fracture Study.

Authors:  T Nymark; J M Lauritsen; O Ovesen; N D Röck; B Jeune
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Women with hip fracture have a greater rate of decline in bone mineral density than expected: another significant consequence of a common geriatric problem.

Authors:  J Magaziner; L Wehren; W G Hawkes; D Orwig; J R Hebel; L Fredman; K Stone; S Zimmerman; M C Hochberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Impaired geometric properties of tibia in older women with hip fracture history.

Authors:  T Mikkola; S Sipilä; E Portegijs; M Kallinen; M Alén; I Kiviranta; M Pekkonen; A Heinonen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Effect of fracture on bone turnover markers: a longitudinal study comparing marker levels before and after injury in 113 elderly women.

Authors:  Kaisa K Ivaska; Paul Gerdhem; Kristina Akesson; Patrick Garnero; Karl J Obrant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Second hip fracture in older men and women: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Sarah D Berry; Elizabeth J Samelson; Marian T Hannan; Robert R McLean; Mei Lu; L Adrienne Cupples; Michele L Shaffer; Alexa L Beiser; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-08

7.  Has mortality after a hip fracture increased?

Authors:  Peter Vestergaard; Lars Rejnmark; Leif Mosekilde
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Incidence of second hip fractures. A population-based study.

Authors:  E Lönnroos; H Kautiainen; P Karppi; S Hartikainen; I Kiviranta; R Sulkava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Chris Edh De Laet; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Thomas J Beck; Huibert Ap Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Heterogeneity in hip fracture patients: age, functional status, and comorbidity.

Authors:  Joan D Penrod; Ann Litke; William G Hawkes; Jay Magaziner; Kenneth J Koval; John T Doucette; Stacey B Silberzweig; Albert L Siu
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  7 in total

1.  Automated DXA-based finite element analysis for hip fracture risk stratification: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S Yang; W D Leslie; Y Luo; A L Goertzen; S Ahmed; L M Ward; I Delubac; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Older men who sustain a hip fracture experience greater declines in bone mineral density at the contralateral hip than non-fractured comparators.

Authors:  A M Rathbun; J Magaziner; M D Shardell; L M Yerges-Armstrong; D Orwig; G E Hicks; M C Hochberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Differences in geometric strength at the contralateral hip between men with hip fracture and non-fractured comparators.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Jay Magaziner; Michelle D Shardell; Thomas J Beck; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong; Denise Orwig; Gregory E Hicks; Alice S Ryan; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Difference in the trajectory of change in bone geometry as measured by hip structural analysis in the narrow neck, intertrochanteric region, and femoral shaft between men and women following hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas J Beck; Jay Magaziner; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Sarcopenia negatively affects hip structure analysis variables in a group of Lebanese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Hayman Saddik; Riad Nasr; Antonio Pinti; Eric Watelain; Ibrahim Fayad; Rafic Baddoura; Abdel-Jalil Berro; Nathalie Al Rassy; Eric Lespessailles; Hechmi Toumi; Rawad El Hage
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Change in vertebral strength and bone mineral density in men and women over the year post-hip fracture: a subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Denise L Orwig; David Kopperdahl; Tony Keaveny; Jay Magaziner; Marc Hochberg
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Physical function and lean body mass as predictors of bone loss after hip fracture: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Tuuli H Suominen; Johanna Edgren; Anu Salpakoski; Mauri Kallinen; Tomas Cervinka; Timo Rantalainen; Timo Törmäkangas; Ari Heinonen; Sarianna Sipilä
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.