Literature DB >> 26847627

Differences in the trajectory of bone mineral density change measured at the total hip and femoral neck between men and women following hip fracture.

Alan M Rathbun1, Michelle Shardell2, Denise Orwig3, J Richard Hebel3, Gregory E Hicks4, Thomas Beck5, Marc C Hochberg3, Jay Magaziner3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Research has not examined changes in bone mineral density (BMD) between men and women following hip fracture. The aim was to evaluate sex differences in BMD following hip fracture. Men experienced significant declines in BMD, while not statistically greater than women, underscoring the necessity for better osteoporosis care in men.
INTRODUCTION: Each year in the USA, approximately 260,000 older adults experience a hip fracture. Women experiencing hip fracture have excess decline in BMD in the year following fracture compared to expected decrements due to aging, but few studies have assessed sex differences in the sequelae of hip fracture. Thus, our objective was to examine sex differences in BMD change in the year after hip fracture.
METHODS: The sample (n = 286) included persons enrolled in the Baltimore Hip Studies 7th cohort, a study that matched (1:1) men and women experiencing hip fracture. Weighted estimating equations that accounted for missing data and selective survival were used to estimate sex differences in 12-month total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN) BMD changes.
RESULTS: Men had larger average adjusted percent decline in TH and FN BMD. Adjusted 12-month decreases at the FN showed a statistically significant decline of -4.60% (95% confidence interval [CI] -7.76%, -0.20%) in men and an insignificant change of -1.62% (95% CI -4.57%, 1.32%) in women. Yet, the difference in change between men and women was not statistically significant (P = 0.17). The estimated sex differences for TH BMD loss were smaller in magnitude.
CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of significant BMD loss among men at the FN in the year after hip fracture. Although not statistically greater than women, these clinically significant findings highlight the need for improved osteoporosis care among men prior to and after hip fracture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; DXA; Hip fracture; Osteoporosis; Sex

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26847627      PMCID: PMC4983447          DOI: 10.1007/s11657-016-0263-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  38 in total

1.  Exercise behavior in a community sample with diabetes: understanding the determinants of exercise behavioral change.

Authors:  R C Plotnikoff; S Brez; S B Hotz
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.140

2.  Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study.

Authors:  E Dennison; R Eastell; C H Fall; S Kellingray; P J Wood; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone mineral density, soft tissue body composition, strength, and functioning after hip fracture.

Authors:  Lois E Wehren; William G Hawkes; J Richard Hebel; Denise L Orwig; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study--a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men.

Authors:  Eric Orwoll; Janet Babich Blank; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane Cauley; Steven Cummings; Kristine Ensrud; Cora Lewis; Peggy M Cawthon; Robert Marcus; Lynn M Marshall; Joan McGowan; Kathy Phipps; Sherry Sherman; Marcia L Stefanick; Katie Stone
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Gender inequalities in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Andrea Bor; Mária Matuz; Nóra Gyimesi; Zsuzsanna Biczók; Gyöngyvér Soós; Péter Doró
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Semiparametric regression models for repeated measures of mortal cohorts with non-monotone missing outcomes and time-dependent covariates.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Gregory E Hicks; Ram R Miller; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Loss of bone density and lean body mass after hip fracture.

Authors:  K M Fox; J Magaziner; W G Hawkes; J Yu-Yahiro; J R Hebel; S I Zimmerman; L Holder; R Michael
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Predictors of bone loss after hip fracture.

Authors:  Lois E Wehren; William G Hawkes; J Richard Hebel; Denise Orwig; Sheryl I Zimmerman; Kathleen M Fox; Janet Yu-Yahiro; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; David A Hanley; K Shawn Davison; Robert Josse; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; David Goltzman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  11 in total

1.  Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Receptor 1, Bone Resorption, and Bone Mineral Density in the Year Following Hip Fractures: The Baltimore Hip Studies.

Authors:  Shabnam Salimi; Michelle Shardell; Ram Miller; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Denise Orwig; Neal Fedarko; Marc C Hochberg; Jack M Guralnik; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Older men who sustain a hip fracture experience greater declines in bone mineral density at the contralateral hip than non-fractured comparators.

Authors:  A M Rathbun; J Magaziner; M D Shardell; L M Yerges-Armstrong; D Orwig; G E Hicks; M C Hochberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Differences in geometric strength at the contralateral hip between men with hip fracture and non-fractured comparators.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Jay Magaziner; Michelle D Shardell; Thomas J Beck; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong; Denise Orwig; Gregory E Hicks; Alice S Ryan; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Sex Differences in Recovery Across Multiple Domains Among Older Adults With Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Denise L Orwig; Danielle S Abraham; Marc C Hochberg; Ann Gruber-Baldini; Jack M Guralnik; Anne R Cappola; Justine Golden; Gregory E Hicks; Ram R Miller; Barbara Resnick; Michelle Shardell; Robert S Sterling; Rashmita Bajracharya; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.591

5.  Difference in the trajectory of change in bone geometry as measured by hip structural analysis in the narrow neck, intertrochanteric region, and femoral shaft between men and women following hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas J Beck; Jay Magaziner; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Persistence of depressive symptoms and gait speed recovery in older adults after hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle D Shardell; Elizabeth A Stuart; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Denise Orwig; Glenn V Ostir; Gregory E Hicks; Marc C Hochberg; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.485

7.  Incident fracture is associated with a period of accelerated loss of hip BMD: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  B A Christiansen; S L Harrison; H A Fink; N E Lane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Comparing Longitudinal Sarcopenia Trends by Definitions Across Men and Women After Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Nancy Chiles Shaffer; Yi Huang; Danielle S Abraham; Yun-Ju Cheng; Wenxin Lu; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Marc C Hochberg; Jack Guralnik; Jay Magaziner; Denise Orwig
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Change in vertebral strength and bone mineral density in men and women over the year post-hip fracture: a subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Denise L Orwig; David Kopperdahl; Tony Keaveny; Jay Magaziner; Marc Hochberg
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Physical function and lean body mass as predictors of bone loss after hip fracture: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Tuuli H Suominen; Johanna Edgren; Anu Salpakoski; Mauri Kallinen; Tomas Cervinka; Timo Rantalainen; Timo Törmäkangas; Ari Heinonen; Sarianna Sipilä
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.