Alan M Rathbun1, Michelle Shardell2, Denise Orwig3, J Richard Hebel3, Gregory E Hicks4, Thomas Beck5, Marc C Hochberg3, Jay Magaziner3. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 660 W. Redwood Street, Howard Hall Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. arathbun@epi.umaryland.edu. 2. National Institute on Aging, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 660 W. Redwood Street, Howard Hall Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. 4. University of Delaware, 540 S. College Ave, Suite 210E, Newark, DE, 19713, USA. 5. Beck Radiological Innovations, 922 Rambling Drive, Catonsville, MD, 21228, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Research has not examined changes in bone mineral density (BMD) between men and women following hip fracture. The aim was to evaluate sex differences in BMD following hip fracture. Men experienced significant declines in BMD, while not statistically greater than women, underscoring the necessity for better osteoporosis care in men. INTRODUCTION: Each year in the USA, approximately 260,000 older adults experience a hip fracture. Women experiencing hip fracture have excess decline in BMD in the year following fracture compared to expected decrements due to aging, but few studies have assessed sex differences in the sequelae of hip fracture. Thus, our objective was to examine sex differences in BMD change in the year after hip fracture. METHODS: The sample (n = 286) included persons enrolled in the Baltimore Hip Studies 7th cohort, a study that matched (1:1) men and women experiencing hip fracture. Weighted estimating equations that accounted for missing data and selective survival were used to estimate sex differences in 12-month total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN) BMD changes. RESULTS: Men had larger average adjusted percent decline in TH and FN BMD. Adjusted 12-month decreases at the FN showed a statistically significant decline of -4.60% (95% confidence interval [CI] -7.76%, -0.20%) in men and an insignificant change of -1.62% (95% CI -4.57%, 1.32%) in women. Yet, the difference in change between men and women was not statistically significant (P = 0.17). The estimated sex differences for TH BMD loss were smaller in magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of significant BMD loss among men at the FN in the year after hip fracture. Although not statistically greater than women, these clinically significant findings highlight the need for improved osteoporosis care among men prior to and after hip fracture.
UNLABELLED: Research has not examined changes in bone mineral density (BMD) between men and women following hip fracture. The aim was to evaluate sex differences in BMD following hip fracture. Men experienced significant declines in BMD, while not statistically greater than women, underscoring the necessity for better osteoporosis care in men. INTRODUCTION: Each year in the USA, approximately 260,000 older adults experience a hip fracture. Women experiencing hip fracture have excess decline in BMD in the year following fracture compared to expected decrements due to aging, but few studies have assessed sex differences in the sequelae of hip fracture. Thus, our objective was to examine sex differences in BMD change in the year after hip fracture. METHODS: The sample (n = 286) included persons enrolled in the Baltimore Hip Studies 7th cohort, a study that matched (1:1) men and women experiencing hip fracture. Weighted estimating equations that accounted for missing data and selective survival were used to estimate sex differences in 12-month total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN) BMD changes. RESULTS:Men had larger average adjusted percent decline in TH and FN BMD. Adjusted 12-month decreases at the FN showed a statistically significant decline of -4.60% (95% confidence interval [CI] -7.76%, -0.20%) in men and an insignificant change of -1.62% (95% CI -4.57%, 1.32%) in women. Yet, the difference in change between men and women was not statistically significant (P = 0.17). The estimated sex differences for TH BMD loss were smaller in magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of significant BMD loss among men at the FN in the year after hip fracture. Although not statistically greater than women, these clinically significant findings highlight the need for improved osteoporosis care among men prior to and after hip fracture.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aging; DXA; Hip fracture; Osteoporosis; Sex
Authors: Lois E Wehren; William G Hawkes; J Richard Hebel; Denise L Orwig; Jay Magaziner Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Eric Orwoll; Janet Babich Blank; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane Cauley; Steven Cummings; Kristine Ensrud; Cora Lewis; Peggy M Cawthon; Robert Marcus; Lynn M Marshall; Joan McGowan; Kathy Phipps; Sherry Sherman; Marcia L Stefanick; Katie Stone Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: K M Fox; J Magaziner; W G Hawkes; J Yu-Yahiro; J R Hebel; S I Zimmerman; L Holder; R Michael Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2000 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Lois E Wehren; William G Hawkes; J Richard Hebel; Denise Orwig; Sheryl I Zimmerman; Kathleen M Fox; Janet Yu-Yahiro; Jay Magaziner Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-12-05 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Claudie Berger; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; David A Hanley; K Shawn Davison; Robert Josse; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; David Goltzman Journal: CMAJ Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Shabnam Salimi; Michelle Shardell; Ram Miller; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Denise Orwig; Neal Fedarko; Marc C Hochberg; Jack M Guralnik; Jay Magaziner Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: A M Rathbun; J Magaziner; M D Shardell; L M Yerges-Armstrong; D Orwig; G E Hicks; M C Hochberg Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Alan M Rathbun; Jay Magaziner; Michelle D Shardell; Thomas J Beck; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong; Denise Orwig; Gregory E Hicks; Alice S Ryan; Marc C Hochberg Journal: Bone Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Denise L Orwig; Danielle S Abraham; Marc C Hochberg; Ann Gruber-Baldini; Jack M Guralnik; Anne R Cappola; Justine Golden; Gregory E Hicks; Ram R Miller; Barbara Resnick; Michelle Shardell; Robert S Sterling; Rashmita Bajracharya; Jay Magaziner Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 6.591
Authors: Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas J Beck; Jay Magaziner; Marc C Hochberg Journal: Bone Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Alan M Rathbun; Michelle D Shardell; Elizabeth A Stuart; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Denise Orwig; Glenn V Ostir; Gregory E Hicks; Marc C Hochberg; Jay Magaziner Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Nancy Chiles Shaffer; Yi Huang; Danielle S Abraham; Yun-Ju Cheng; Wenxin Lu; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Marc C Hochberg; Jack Guralnik; Jay Magaziner; Denise Orwig Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Tuuli H Suominen; Johanna Edgren; Anu Salpakoski; Mauri Kallinen; Tomas Cervinka; Timo Rantalainen; Timo Törmäkangas; Ari Heinonen; Sarianna Sipilä Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 2.362