Literature DB >> 31799055

Semi-anthropomorphic photoacoustic breast phantom.

Maura Dantuma1,2, Rianne van Dommelen2, Srirang Manohar1.   

Abstract

Imaging parameters of photoacoustic breast imaging systems such as the spatial resolution and imaging depth are often characterized with phantoms. These objects usually contain simple structures in homogeneous media such as absorbing wires or spherical objects in scattering gels. While these kinds of basic phantoms are uncluttered and useful, they do not challenge the system as much as a breast does, and can thereby overestimate the system's performance. The female breast is a complex collection of tissue types, and the acoustic and optical attenuation of these tissues limit the imaging depth, the resolution and the ability to extract quantitative information. For testing and challenging photoacoustic breast imaging systems to the full extent before moving to in vivo studies, a complex breast phantom which simulates the breast's most prevalent tissues is required. In this work we present the first three dimensional multi-layered semi-anthropomorphic photoacoustic breast phantom. The phantom aims to simulate skin, fat, fibroglandular tissue and blood vessels. The latter three are made from custom polyvinyl chloride plastisol (PVCP) formulations and are appropriately doped with additives to obtain tissue realistic acoustic and optical properties. Two tumors are embedded, which are modeled as clusters of small blood vessels. The PVCP materials are surrounded by a silicon layer mimicking the skin. The tissue mimicking materials were cast into the shapes and sizes expected in the breast using 3D-printed moulds developed from a magnetic resonance imaging segmented numerical breast model. The various structures and layers were assembled to obtain a realistic breast morphology. We demonstrate the phantom's appearance in both ultrasound imaging as photoacoustic tomography and make a comparison with a photoacoustic image of a real breast. A good correspondence is observed, which confirms the phantom's usefulness.
© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31799055      PMCID: PMC6865090          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.005921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  54 in total

1.  Clinical photoacoustic breast imaging: the Twente experience.

Authors:  Michelle Heijblom; Wiendelt Steenbergen; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  IEEE Pulse       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.924

2.  Assessment of ultrasonic computed tomography in symptomatic breast patients by discriminant analysis.

Authors:  A L Scherzinger; R A Belgam; P L Carson; C R Meyer; J V Sutherland; F L Bookstein; T M Silver
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Biomedical photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Paul Beard
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of the human breast: characterisation of healthy tissue and malignant lesions using a hybrid ultrasound-optoacoustic approach.

Authors:  Anne Becker; Max Masthoff; Jing Claussen; Steven James Ford; Wolfgang Roll; Matthias Burg; Peter J Barth; Walter Heindel; Michael Schäfers; Michel Eisenblätter; Moritz Wildgruber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Visualizing breast cancer using the Twente photoacoustic mammoscope: what do we learn from twelve new patient measurements?

Authors:  M Heijblom; D Piras; W Xia; J C G van Hespen; J M Klaase; F M van den Engh; T G van Leeuwen; W Steenbergen; S Manohar
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  A realistic deformable prostate phantom for multimodal imaging and needle-insertion procedures.

Authors:  Nikolai Hungr; Jean-Alexandre Long; Vincent Beix; Jocelyne Troccaz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Poly(vinyl alcohol) gels for use as tissue phantoms in photoacoustic mammography.

Authors:  Alexei Kharine; Srirang Manohar; Rosalyn Seeton; Roy G M Kolkman; René A Bolt; Wiendelt Steenbergen; Frits F M de Mul
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Copolymer-in-oil phantom materials for elastography.

Authors:  J Oudry; C Bastard; V Miette; R Willinger; L Sandrin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Breast tissue composition and its dependence on demographic risk factors for breast cancer: non-invasive assessment by time domain diffuse optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Paola Taroni; Giovanna Quarto; Antonio Pifferi; Francesca Abbate; Nicola Balestreri; Simona Menna; Enrico Cassano; Rinaldo Cubeddu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Criteria for the design of tissue-mimicking phantoms for the standardization of biophotonic instrumentation.

Authors:  Lina Hacker; Heidrun Wabnitz; Antonio Pifferi; T Joshua Pfefer; Brian W Pogue; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Tissue-mimicking phantom materials with tunable optical properties suitable for assessment of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy during electrosurgery.

Authors:  Sara Azizian Amiri; Pieter Van Berckel; Marco Lai; Jenny Dankelman; Benno H W Hendriks
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Quantification of vascular networks in photoacoustic mesoscopy.

Authors:  Emma L Brown; Thierry L Lefebvre; Paul W Sweeney; Bernadette J Stolz; Janek Gröhl; Lina Hacker; Ziqiang Huang; Dominique-Laurent Couturier; Heather A Harrington; Helen M Byrne; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  Development of patient-specific 3D-printed breast phantom using silicone and peanut oils for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rooa Sindi; Yin How Wong; Chai Hong Yeong; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-06

5.  Reflection-mode acousto-optic imaging using a one-dimensional ultrasound array with electronically scanned focus.

Authors:  Lukasz J Nowak; Wiendelt Steenbergen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Suite of 3D test objects for performance assessment of hybrid photoacoustic-ultrasound breast imaging systems.

Authors:  Maura Dantuma; Saskia C Kruitwagen; Marlies J Weggemans; Tim J P M Op't Root; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.758

Review 7.  Review of consensus test methods in medical imaging and current practices in photoacoustic image quality assessment.

Authors:  Jorge Palma-Chavez; T Joshua Pfefer; Anant Agrawal; Jesse V Jokerst; William C Vogt
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Photoacoustic imaging phantoms for assessment of object detectability and boundary buildup artifacts.

Authors:  Jorge Palma-Chavez; Keith A Wear; Yash Mantri; Jesse V Jokerst; William C Vogt
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2022-03-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.