Literature DB >> 32550133

Development of patient-specific 3D-printed breast phantom using silicone and peanut oils for magnetic resonance imaging.

Rooa Sindi1,2, Yin How Wong3, Chai Hong Yeong3, Zhonghua Sun1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing reports of 3D printing in medical applications, the use of 3D printing in breast imaging is limited, thus, personalized 3D-printed breast model could be a novel approach to overcome current limitations in utilizing breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for quantitative assessment of breast density. The aim of this study is to develop a patient-specific 3D-printed breast phantom and to identify the most appropriate materials for simulating the MR imaging characteristics of fibroglandular and adipose tissues.
METHODS: A patient-specific 3D-printed breast model was generated using 3D-printing techniques for the construction of the hollow skin and fibroglandular region shells. Then, the T1 relaxation times of the five selected materials (agarose gel, silicone rubber with/without fish oil, silicone oil, and peanut oil) were measured on a 3T MRI system to determine the appropriate ones to represent the MR imaging characteristics of fibroglandular and adipose tissues. Results were then compared to the reference values of T1 relaxation times of the corresponding tissues: 1,324.42±167.63 and 449.27±26.09 ms, respectively. Finally, the materials that matched the T1 relaxation times of the respective tissues were used to fill the 3D-printed hollow breast shells.
RESULTS: The silicone and peanut oils were found to closely resemble the T1 relaxation times and imaging characteristics of these two tissues, which are 1,515.8±105.5 and 405.4±15.1 ms, respectively. The agarose gel with different concentrations, ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 wt%, was found to have the longest T1 relaxation times.
CONCLUSIONS: A patient-specific 3D-printed breast phantom was successfully designed and constructed using silicone and peanut oils to simulate the MR imaging characteristics of fibroglandular and adipose tissues. The phantom can be used to investigate different MR breast imaging protocols for the quantitative assessment of breast density. 2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); T1 and T2 relaxation times; breast density; digital light processing (DLP); fibroglandular-tissue; fused deposition modelling (FDM); peanut oil; photopolymer resin; polylactic acid (PLA); silicone oil

Year:  2020        PMID: 32550133      PMCID: PMC7276357          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  35 in total

1.  A new bias field correction method combining N3 and FCM for improved segmentation of breast density on MRI.

Authors:  Muqing Lin; Siwa Chan; Jeon-Hor Chen; Daniel Chang; Ke Nie; Shih-Ting Chen; Cheng-Ju Lin; Tzu-Ching Shih; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  High-risk breast lesions at imaging-guided needle biopsy: usefulness of MRI for treatment decision.

Authors:  Viviana Londero; Chiara Zuiani; Anna Linda; Rossano Girometti; Massimo Bazzocchi; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Martha B Mainiero; Ana Lourenco; Mary C Mahoney; Mary S Newell; Lisa Bailey; Lora D Barke; Carl D'Orsi; Jennifer A Harvey; Mary K Hayes; Phan Tuong Huynh; Peter M Jokich; Su-Ju Lee; Constance D Lehman; David A Mankoff; Joshua A Nepute; Samir B Patel; Handel E Reynolds; M Linda Sutherland; Bruce G Haffty
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Giulio Tagliafico; Davide Astengo; Sonia Airaldi; Massimo Calabrese; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  3D-printed breast phantom for multi-purpose and multi-modality imaging.

Authors:  Yaoyao He; Yulin Liu; Brandon A Dyer; John M Boone; Shanshan Liu; Tiao Chen; Fenglian Zheng; Ye Zhu; Yong Sun; Yi Rong; Jianfeng Qiu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-01

Review 6.  Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A Baltzer; Ulrich Bick; Catherine Colin; Eleanor Cornford; Andrew Evans; Eva Fallenberg; Gabor Forrai; Michael H Fuchsjäger; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Julia Camps-Herrero; Christiane K Kuhl; Laura Martincich; Federica Pediconi; Pietro Panizza; Luis J Pina; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Per Skaane; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Breast MRI segmentation for density estimation: Do different methods give the same results and how much do differences matter?

Authors:  Simon J Doran; John H Hipwell; Rachel Denholm; Björn Eiben; Marta Busana; David J Hawkes; Martin O Leach; Isabel Dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.

Authors:  Jeff Wang; Ania Azziz; Bo Fan; Serghei Malkov; Catherine Klifa; David Newitt; Silaja Yitta; Nola Hylton; Karla Kerlikowske; John A Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Effect of preventive hormonal therapy on breast density: a systematic qualitative review.

Authors:  Virginie Lienart; Birgit Carly; Xin Kang; Laura Guzy; Anna-Maria Sajovitz; Fabienne Liebens
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-04-27

10.  Breast density assessment using a 3T MRI system: comparison among different sequences.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Bianca Bignotti; Giulio Tagliafico; Davide Astengo; Lucia Martino; Sonia Airaldi; Alessio Signori; Maria Pia Sormani; Nehmat Houssami; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  A simplified scoring protocol to improve diagnostic accuracy with the breast imaging reporting and data system in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Liuquan Cheng; Xiru Li; Yuting Zhong; Menglu Li; Jingjin Zhu; Boya Zhang; Mei Liu; Zhili Wang; Jiandong Wang; Yiqiong Zheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

2.  In Silico Study on Tumor-Size-Dependent Thermal Profiles inside an Anthropomorphic Female Breast Phantom Subjected to Multi-Dipole Antenna Array.

Authors:  Piotr Gas; Arkadiusz Miaskowski; Mahendran Subramanian
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.