Literature DB >> 35774339

Tissue-mimicking phantom materials with tunable optical properties suitable for assessment of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy during electrosurgery.

Sara Azizian Amiri1, Pieter Van Berckel1, Marco Lai2,3, Jenny Dankelman1, Benno H W Hendriks1,2.   

Abstract

Emerging intraoperative tumor margin assessment techniques require the development of more complex and reliable organ phantoms to assess the performance of the technique before its translation into the clinic. In this work, electrically conductive tissue-mimicking materials (TMMs) based on fat, water and agar/gelatin were produced with tunable optical properties. The composition of the phantoms allowed for the assessment of tumor margins using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, as the fat/water ratio served as a discriminating factor between the healthy and malignant tissue. Moreover, the possibility of using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or transglutaminase in combination with fat, water and gelatin for developing TMMs was studied. The diffuse spectral response of the developed phantom materials had a good match with the spectral response of porcine muscle and adipose tissue, as well as in vitro human breast tissue. Using the developed recipe, anatomically relevant heterogeneous breast phantoms representing the optical properties of different layers of the human breast were fabricated using 3D-printed molds. These TMMs can be used for further development of phantoms applicable for simulating the realistic breast conserving surgery workflow in order to evaluate the intraoperative optical-based tumor margin assessment techniques during electrosurgery.
© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35774339      PMCID: PMC9203083          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.449637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.562


  77 in total

Review 1.  Review of tissue simulating phantoms for optical spectroscopy, imaging and dosimetry.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Michael S Patterson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Real-time oncological guidance using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in electrosurgery: the effect of coagulation on tissue discrimination.

Authors:  Maartje W Adank; Julie C Fleischer; Jenny Dankelman; Benno H W Hendriks
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer Management.

Authors:  Chantal Reyna; Sarah M DeSnyder
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  A 3D interconnected microchannel network formed in gelatin by sacrificial shellac microfibers.

Authors:  Leon M Bellan; Matthew Pearsall; Donald M Cropek; Robert Langer
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 5.  Tissue mimicking materials in image-guided needle-based interventions: A review.

Authors:  Pan Li; Zhiyong Yang; Shan Jiang
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 7.328

6.  Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: towards clinical application in breast cancer.

Authors:  Daniel J Evers; Rami Nachabe; Marie-Jeanne Vranken Peeters; Jos A van der Hage; Hester S Oldenburg; Emiel J Rutgers; Gerald W Lucassen; Benno H W Hendriks; Jelle Wesseling; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Optical breast cancer margin assessment: an observational study of the effects of tissue heterogeneity on optical contrast.

Authors:  Stephanie Kennedy; Joseph Geradts; Torre Bydlon; J Quincy Brown; Jennifer Gallagher; Marlee Junker; William Barry; Nimmi Ramanujam; Lee Wilke
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Review of tissue simulating phantoms with controllable optical, mechanical and structural properties for use in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Guy Lamouche; Brendan F Kennedy; Kelsey M Kennedy; Charles-Etienne Bisaillon; Andrea Curatolo; Gord Campbell; Valérie Pazos; David D Sampson
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Heterogeneous breast phantom development for microwave imaging using regression models.

Authors:  Camerin Hahn; Sima Noghanian
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2012-04-08

10.  Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons.

Authors:  Lisa Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.