Literature DB >> 2538018

Assessment of ultrasonic computed tomography in symptomatic breast patients by discriminant analysis.

A L Scherzinger1, R A Belgam, P L Carson, C R Meyer, J V Sutherland, F L Bookstein, T M Silver.   

Abstract

From 95 subjects imaged with both speed of sound and attenuation ultrasonic computed tomography (UCT), quantitative analyses are presented on 40 cases where unequivocal correlating clinical diagnoses are available. Using four attenuation and speed of sound parameters from different regions of interest in the breast, a linear discriminator detects cancer with approximately 90% sensitivity and specificity. Increased confidence in the predictive power of this small study is given by a modern test of predictive power (jackknifing) and by the fact that diagnostic discrimination remains as high as 85% when only two parameters are employed--attenuation and speed of sound in the lesion minus those values in the remaining central mammary tissues. Speed of sound images appear particularly useful in older, fatty breasts where pulse echo ultrasound is particularly lacking. While UCT in the form studied here is not likely to receive wide clinical acceptance in the near future, a combined UCT/pulse echo system might find wide clinical utility if it can be sufficiently convenient and inexpensive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2538018     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(89)90128-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  10 in total

1.  Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for testing elastography systems.

Authors:  Ernest L Madsen; Maritza A Hobson; Gary R Frank; Hairong Shi; Jingfeng Jiang; Timothy J Hall; Tomy Varghese; Marvin M Doyley; John B Weaver
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  Non-linear inverse scattering: high resolution quantitative breast tissue tomography.

Authors:  J Wiskin; D T Borup; S A Johnson; M Berggren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Initial phantom study on estimation of speed of sound in medium using coherence among received echo signals.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa; Ryo Nagaoka
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Acoustic attenuation imaging of tissue bulk properties with a priori information.

Authors:  Fong Ming Hooi; Oliver Kripfgans; Paul L Carson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  First-arrival traveltime sound speed inversion with a priori information.

Authors:  Fong Ming Hooi; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Acoustic beam anomalies in automated breast imaging.

Authors:  Rungroj Jintamethasawat; Xiaohui Zhang; Paul L Carson; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-12

8.  In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography.

Authors:  Cuiping Li; Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lianjie Huang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Semi-anthropomorphic photoacoustic breast phantom.

Authors:  Maura Dantuma; Rianne van Dommelen; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Multimodal Breast Phantoms for Microwave, Ultrasound, Mammography, Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ruvio; Raffaele Solimene; Antonio Cuccaro; Gaia Fiaschetti; Andrew J Fagan; Sean Cournane; Jennie Cooke; Max J Ammann; Jorge Tobon; Jacinta E Browne
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.