Literature DB >> 35624150

Criteria for the design of tissue-mimicking phantoms for the standardization of biophotonic instrumentation.

Lina Hacker1,2, Heidrun Wabnitz3, Antonio Pifferi4, T Joshua Pfefer5, Brian W Pogue6, Sarah E Bohndiek7,8.   

Abstract

A lack of accepted standards and standardized phantoms suitable for the technical validation of biophotonic instrumentation hinders the reliability and reproducibility of its experimental outputs. In this Perspective, we discuss general criteria for the design of tissue-mimicking biophotonic phantoms, and use these criteria and state-of-the-art developments to critically review the literature on phantom materials and on the fabrication of phantoms. By focusing on representative examples of standardization in diffuse optical imaging and spectroscopy, fluorescence-guided surgery and photoacoustic imaging, we identify unmet needs in the development of phantoms and a set of criteria (leveraging characterization, collaboration, communication and commitment) for the standardization of biophotonic instrumentation.
© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35624150     DOI: 10.1038/s41551-022-00890-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2157-846X            Impact factor:   25.671


  133 in total

1.  Double-integrating-sphere system at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in support of measurement standards for the determination of optical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Paul Lemaillet; Jean-Pierre Bouchard; Jeeseong Hwang; David W Allen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Performance assessment of photon migration instruments: the MEDPHOT protocol.

Authors:  Antonio Pifferi; Alessandro Torricelli; Andrea Bassi; Paola Taroni; Rinaldo Cubeddu; Heidrun Wabnitz; Dirk Grosenick; Michael Möller; Rainer Macdonald; Johannes Swartling; Tomas Svensson; Stefan Andersson-Engels; Robert L P van Veen; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Jean-Michel Tualle; Ha Lien Nghiem; Sigrid Avrillier; Maurice Whelan; Hermann Stamm
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2005-04-10       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 3.  Review of tissue simulating phantoms for optical spectroscopy, imaging and dosimetry.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Michael S Patterson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Instrumentation as a source of variability in the application of fluorescence spectroscopic devices for detecting cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  Brian M Pikkula; Olga Shuhatovich; Roderick L Price; Dan M Serachitopol; Michele Follen; Nick McKinnon; Calum MacAulay; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Jong Soo Lee; E Neely Atkinson; Dennis D Cox
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 5.  Optical imaging: current applications and future directions.

Authors:  Gary D Luker; Kathryn E Luker
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Experimental test of theoretical models for time-resolved reflectance.

Authors:  R Cubeddu; A Pifferi; P Taroni; A Torricelli; G Valentini
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Regulatory Aspects of Optical Methods and Exogenous Targets for Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Willemieke S Tummers; Jason M Warram; Kiranya E Tipirneni; John Fengler; Paula Jacobs; Lalitha Shankar; Lori Henderson; Betsy Ballard; T Joshua Pfefer; Brian W Pogue; Jamey P Weichert; Michael Bouvet; Jonathan Sorger; Christopher H Contag; John V Frangioni; Michael F Tweedle; James P Basilion; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Optical properties of biological tissues: a review.

Authors:  Steven L Jacques
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Quantitative multimodality imaging in cancer research and therapy.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Richard G Abramson; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Current and future trends in multimodality imaging of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Erick Alexanderson-Rosas; Gerardo Y Guinto-Nishimura; Jose Raul Cruz-Mendoza; Mariano Oropeza-Aguilar; Juan Carlos De La Fuente-Mancera; Alejandro F Barrero-Mier; Andrea Monroy-Gonzalez; Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco; Roberto Cano-Zarate; Aloha Meave-Gonzalez
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.