| Literature DB >> 31795137 |
Sergio Castañeda-Zegarra1,2, Camilla Huse1,2, Øystein Røsand1,2, Antonio Sarno1,2, Mengtan Xing1,2, Raquel Gago-Fuentes1,2, Qindong Zhang1,2, Amin Alirezaylavasani1,2, Julia Werner1,2,3, Ping Ji1, Nina-Beate Liabakk1, Wei Wang1, Magnar Bjørås1,2, Valentyn Oksenych1,2,4.
Abstract
Classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is a molecular pathway that detects, processes, and ligates DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) throughout the cell cycle. Mutations in several NHEJ genes result in neurological abnormalities and immunodeficiency both in humans and mice. The NHEJ pathway is required for V(D)J recombination in developing B and T lymphocytes, and for class switch recombination in mature B cells. The Ku heterodimer formed by Ku70 and Ku80 recognizes DSBs and facilitates the recruitment of accessory factors (e.g., DNA-PKcs, Artemis, Paxx and Mri/Cyren) and downstream core factor subunits X-ray repair cross-complementing group 4 (XRCC4), XRCC4-like factor (XLF), and DNA ligase 4 (Lig4). Accessory factors might be dispensable for the process, depending on the genetic background and DNA lesion type. To determine the physiological role of Mri in DNA repair and development, we introduced a frame-shift mutation in the Mri gene in mice. We then analyzed the development of Mri-deficient mice as well as wild type and immunodeficient controls. Mice lacking Mri possessed reduced levels of class switch recombination in B lymphocytes and slow proliferation of neuronal progenitors when compared to wild type littermates. Human cell lines lacking Mri were as sensitive to DSBs as the wild type controls. Overall, we concluded that Mri/Cyren is largely dispensable for DNA repair and mouse development.Entities:
Keywords: NHEJ; double-strand breaks; lymphocyte; mouse model; neurodevelopment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31795137 PMCID: PMC6995585 DOI: 10.3390/biom9120798
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Generation of Modulator of retrovirus infection (Mri) mice. (A) Top. Schematic diagram of murine Mri locus indicating the frame-shift mutation in the exon 2, induced by the single guide RNA (sgRNA) and resulting in a 14 bp deletion. (Bottom) Resulting Mri locus lacking part of the exon 2. (B) Top. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based genotyping strategy reveals the Mri WT allele (428 bp) and Mri null allele (414 bp). (Bottom) WT gene validation PCR revealed the Mri wild type allele (234 bp). (C) Analyses of 140 pups born from Mri parents revealed expected genetic distribution of Mri (29), Mri (75), and Mri (36) mice, which is close to the Mendelian distribution 1:2:1. (D) Body weight of six to eight week old Mri mice (n = 6) was not distinguishable from Mri mice (n = 7), p = 0.4242. (E) The weight of spleens isolated from Mri (n = 8) and Mri mice (n = 11) was not significantly different, p = 0.8551. Spleen size in immunodeficient Dna-pkcs mice (n = 10) was reduced when compared to the Mri and Mri mice, p < 0.0001. (F) Splenocyte count was not affected in the Mri mice (n = 11) when compared to the Mri(n = 10), p = 0.7713. A number of splenocytes in immunodeficient Dna-pkcs mice (n = 6) was significantly reduced when compared to Mriand Mri mice, p < 0.0001. (G) The weight of thymus from Mri(n = 11) and Mri (n = 11) mice was similar, p = 0.6796. Thymus size in immunodeficient Dna-pkcs mice (n = 7) was significantly reduced when compared to Mriand Mri mice, p < 0.0001. (H) The thymocyte count was nearly identical in Mri(n = 8) and Mri (n = 6) mice, p = 0.5285. A number of thymocytes in immunodeficient Dna-pkcs mice (n = 6) was significantly reduced when compared to Mriand Mri mice, p < 0.0001.
Figure 2Lymphocyte development in Mri mice. (A) Proportions of T (CD3+) and B (CD19+) cells in the spleens of Mri(n = 6), Mri (n = 3), and Dna-pkcs (n = 4) mice. Proportions of T and B cells were similar in Mriand Mri mice, p > 0.0667, and were only background levels in immunodeficient Dna-pkcs mice, p < 0.0001. (B) Proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ T splenocytes in Mri(n = 6), Mri (n = 3), and Dna-pkcs (n = 4) mice. Mri mice possessed similar proportions of CD4+ T helper and CD8+ T cytotoxic cells when compared to Mri mice, p = 0.8876 and p = 0.7026, respectively. Only background levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are present in immunodeficient Dna-pkcs spleens, p < 0.0001. (C) Proportions of CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+CD8+ thymocytes in Mri(n = 6), Mri (n = 3), and Dna-pkcs (n = 4) mice. Proportions of T cell types in Mri mice were similar to the ones detected in Mrimice, p > 0.5589, and higher than in Dna-pkcs mice, p < 0.0001. (D) CSR to IgG1 in primary B splenocytes isolated from the Mri mice (n = 4) was reduced when compared to the cells from the Mrimice (n = 3), p = 0.0032. CSR to IgG1 was significantly reduced in the Ung B cells (n = 3) when compared to the Mri and Mri, p < 0.0001.
Figure 3Characterization of neurogenesis in Mri mice. For each experiment, four independent cell lines isolated from two mice were used (n = 8). (A) Neurosphere isolation diagram from Mri and Mri mice at postnatal day 1. (B) Neurosphere proliferation isolated from the Mri mice was reduced when compared to the Mri mice, p = 0.0043. (C) Number of neurospheres formed in cell culture for eight days. Mri and Mri neurospheres possessed similar self-renewal capacity, p = 0.7254. (D) Neurosphere size isolated from Mri and Mri mice were similar, p = 0.4915. The surface of neurospheres, pxl. Areas between 50 and 1500 pixels were included in the analyses. Four independent experiments using two cell lines of each genotype were performed in all experiments (A–C). p values were calculated using the unpaired t-test. The horizontal bars represent the average.
Figure 4Sensitivity to DSBs in Mri-deficient HAP1 cells. Sensitization of WT, two independent Mri-deficient clones, MRI and MRI, and XRCC4HAP1 cells to bleomycin (A), doxorubicin (B), and etoposide (C) at indicated concentrations. Results are from the mean (SD) of three repeats. Cell viability (%) represents the relative proportion of the fluorescence normalized to untreated cells. Comparisons between every two groups were made using one-way ANOVA, GraphPad Prism 8. WT, MRI, and MRI vs. XRCC4, p < 0.0001 (****); WT vs. MRI, p = 0.9983 (n.s); WT vs. MRI, p = 0.1295 (n.s); MRI vs. MRI, p = 0.1791 (n.s).