Literature DB >> 22308489

Functional redundancy between repair factor XLF and damage response mediator 53BP1 in V(D)J recombination and DNA repair.

Valentyn Oksenych1, Frederick W Alt, Vipul Kumar, Bjoern Schwer, Duane R Wesemann, Erica Hansen, Harin Patel, Arthur Su, Chunguang Guo.   

Abstract

The classical nonhomologous DNA end-joining (C-NHEJ) double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway in mammalian cells maintains genome stability and is required for V(D)J recombination and lymphocyte development. Mutations in the XLF C-NHEJ factor or ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) DSB response protein cause radiosensitivity and immunodeficiency in humans. Although potential roles for XLF in C-NHEJ are unknown, ATM activates a general DSB response by phosphorylating substrates, including histone H2AX and 53BP1, which are assembled into chromatin complexes around DSBs. In mice, C-NHEJ, V(D)J recombination, and lymphocyte development are, at most, modestly impaired in the absence of XLF or ATM, but are severely impaired in the absence of both. Redundant functions of XLF and ATM depend on ATM kinase activity; correspondingly, combined XLF and H2AX deficiency severely impairs V(D)J recombination, even though H2AX deficiency alone has little impact on this process. These and other findings suggest that XLF may provide functions that overlap more broadly with assembled DSB response factors on chromatin. As one test of this notion, we generated mice and cells with a combined deficiency for XLF and 53BP1. In this context, 53BP1 deficiency, although leading to genome instability, has only modest effects on V(D)J recombination or lymphocyte development. Strikingly, we find that combined XLF/53BP1 deficiency in mice severely impairs C-NHEJ, V(D)J recombination, and lymphocyte development while also leading to general genomic instability and growth defects. We conclude that XLF is functionally redundant with multiple members of the ATM-dependent DNA damage response in facilitating C-NHEJ and discuss implications of our findings for potential functions of these factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22308489      PMCID: PMC3289340          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1121458109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

Review 1.  The role of mechanistic factors in promoting chromosomal translocations found in lymphoid and other cancers.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Monica Gostissa; Dominic G Hildebrand; Michael S Becker; Cristian Boboila; Roberto Chiarle; Susanna Lewis; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.543

2.  53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks.

Authors:  Samuel F Bunting; Elsa Callén; Nancy Wong; Hua-Tang Chen; Federica Polato; Amanda Gunn; Anne Bothmer; Niklas Feldhahn; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Liu Cao; Xiaoling Xu; Chu-Xia Deng; Toren Finkel; Michel Nussenzweig; Jeremy M Stark; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Alternative end-joining catalyzes robust IgH locus deletions and translocations in the combined absence of ligase 4 and Ku70.

Authors:  Cristian Boboila; Mila Jankovic; Catherine T Yan; Jing H Wang; Duane R Wesemann; Tingting Zhang; Alex Fazeli; Lauren Feldman; Andre Nussenzweig; Michel Nussenzweig; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  IgH class switching and translocations use a robust non-classical end-joining pathway.

Authors:  Catherine T Yan; Cristian Boboila; Ellen Kris Souza; Sonia Franco; Thomas R Hickernell; Michael Murphy; Sunil Gumaste; Mark Geyer; Ali A Zarrin; John P Manis; Klaus Rajewsky; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  53BP1 regulates DNA resection and the choice between classical and alternative end joining during class switch recombination.

Authors:  Anne Bothmer; Davide F Robbiani; Niklas Feldhahn; Anna Gazumyan; Andre Nussenzweig; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 6.  Solving the RIDDLE of 53BP1 recruitment to sites of damage.

Authors:  Grant S Stewart
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Defective DNA repair and increased genomic instability in Cernunnos-XLF-deficient murine ES cells.

Authors:  Shan Zha; Frederick W Alt; Hwei-Ling Cheng; James W Brush; Gang Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  ATM damage response and XLF repair factor are functionally redundant in joining DNA breaks.

Authors:  Shan Zha; Chunguang Guo; Cristian Boboila; Valentyn Oksenych; Hwei-Ling Cheng; Yu Zhang; Duane R Wesemann; Grace Yuen; Harin Patel; Peter H Goff; Richard L Dubois; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Histone H2AX stabilizes broken DNA strands to suppress chromosome breaks and translocations during V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Bu Yin; Velibor Savic; Marisa M Juntilla; Andrea L Bredemeyer; Katherine S Yang-Iott; Beth A Helmink; Gary A Koretzky; Barry P Sleckman; Craig H Bassing
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  53BP1 facilitates long-range DNA end-joining during V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Simone Difilippantonio; Eric Gapud; Nancy Wong; Ching-Yu Huang; Grace Mahowald; Hua Tang Chen; Michael J Kruhlak; Elsa Callen; Ferenc Livak; Michel C Nussenzweig; Barry P Sleckman; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Structural insights into NHEJ: building up an integrated picture of the dynamic DSB repair super complex, one component and interaction at a time.

Authors:  Gareth J Williams; Michal Hammel; Sarvan Kumar Radhakrishnan; Dale Ramsden; Susan P Lees-Miller; John A Tainer
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-20

2.  MOF phosphorylation by ATM regulates 53BP1-mediated double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Muralidhar L Hegde; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Durga Udayakumar; Nobuo Horikoshi; Mayank Singh; Deepti B Ramnarain; Walter N Hittelman; Sarita Namjoshi; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Tapas K Hazra; Thomas Ludwig; Raj K Pandita; Jessica K Tyler; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 3.  Repair of double-strand breaks by end joining.

Authors:  Kishore K Chiruvella; Zhuobin Liang; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  PAXX and XLF DNA repair factors are functionally redundant in joining DNA breaks in a G1-arrested progenitor B-cell line.

Authors:  Vipul Kumar; Frederick W Alt; Richard L Frock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  XLF/Cernunnos: An important but puzzling participant in the nonhomologous end joining DNA repair pathway.

Authors:  Vijay Menon; Lawrence F Povirk
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-08-18

Review 6.  Role of 53BP1 in the regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Raj K Pandita; John Yordy; Deepti B Ramnarain; Nobuo Horikoshi; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  A role for XLF in DNA repair and recombination in human somatic cells.

Authors:  Farjana Jahan Fattah; Junghun Kweon; Yongbao Wang; Eu Han Lee; Yinan Kan; Natalie Lichter; Natalie Weisensel; Eric A Hendrickson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-01-21

Review 8.  Lymphocyte development: integration of DNA damage response signaling.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Bednarski; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.543

Review 9.  XRCC4 and XLF form long helical protein filaments suitable for DNA end protection and alignment to facilitate DNA double strand break repair.

Authors:  Brandi L Mahaney; Michal Hammel; Katheryn Meek; John A Tainer; Susan P Lees-Miller
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.626

10.  RIF1 in DNA break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  James M Daley; Patrick Sung
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.