Literature DB >> 31741655

Assessing PM2.5 Model Performance for the Conterminous U.S. with Comparison to Model Performance Statistics from 2007-2015.

James T Kelly1, Shannon N Koplitz1, Kirk R Baker1, Amara L Holder2, Havala O T Pye2, Benjamin N Murphy2, Jesse O Bash2, Barron H Henderson1, Norm Possiel1, Heather Simon1, Alison M Eyth1, Carey Jang1, Sharon Phillips1, Brian Timin1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have proposed that model performance statistics from earlier photochemical grid model (PGM) applications can be used to benchmark performance in new PGM applications. A challenge in implementing this approach is that limited information is available on consistently calculated model performance statistics that vary spatially and temporally over the U.S. Here, a consistent set of model performance statistics are calculated by year, season, region, and monitoring network for PM2.5 and its major components using simulations from versions 4.7.1-5.2.1 of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model for years 2007-2015. The multi-year set of statistics is then used to provide quantitative context for model performance results from the 2015 simulation. Model performance for PM2.5 organic carbon in the 2015 simulation ranked high (i.e., favorable performance) in the multi-year dataset, due to factors including recent improvements in biogenic secondary organic aerosol and atmospheric mixing parameterizations in CMAQ. Model performance statistics for the Northwest region in 2015 ranked low (i.e., unfavorable performance) for many species in comparison to the 2007-2015 dataset. This finding motivated additional investigation that suggests a need for improved speciation of wildfire PM2.5emissions and modeling of boundary layer dynamics near water bodies. Several limitations were identified in the approach of benchmarking new model performance results with previous results. Since performance statistics vary widely by region and season, a simple set of national performance benchmarks (e.g., one or two targets per species and statistic) as proposed previously are inadequate to assess model performance throughout the U.S. Also, trends in model performance statistics for sulfate over the 2007 to 2015 period suggest that model performance for earlier years may not be a useful reference for assessing model performance for recent years in some cases. Comparisons of results from the 2015 base case with results from five sensitivity simulations demonstrated the importance of parameterizations of NH3 surface exchange, organic aerosol volatility and production, and emissions of crustal cations for predicting PM2.5 species concentrations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMAQ; ammonia; crustal cations; model evaluation; organic aerosol

Year:  2019        PMID: 31741655      PMCID: PMC6859642          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  23 in total

1.  Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study.

Authors:  Judith C Chow; John G Watson; Hampden Kuhns; Vicken Etyemezian; Douglas H Lowenthal; Dale Crow; Steven D Kohl; Johann P Engelbrecht; Mark C Green
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Simulating the degree of oxidation in atmospheric organic particles.

Authors:  Heather Simon; Prakash V Bhave
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Emissions inventory of PM2.5 trace elements across the United States.

Authors:  Adam Reff; Prakash V Bhave; Heather Simon; Thompson G Pace; George A Pouliot; J David Mobley; Marc Houyoux
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts using surface, aircraft, and satellite data.

Authors:  K R Baker; M C Woody; L Valin; J Szykman; E L Yates; L T Iraci; H D Choi; A J Soja; S N Koplitz; L Zhou; Pedro Campuzano-Jost; Jose L Jimenez; J W Hair
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Drying-Induced Evaporation of Secondary Organic Aerosol during Summer.

Authors:  Marwa M H El-Sayed; Dziedzorm Amenumey; Christopher J Hennigan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Development of the crop residue and rangeland burning in the 2014 National Emissions Inventory using information from multiple sources.

Authors:  George Pouliot; Venkatesh Rao; Jessica L McCarty; Amber Soja
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Chemical feedbacks weaken the wintertime response of particulate sulfate and nitrate to emissions reductions over the eastern United States.

Authors:  Viral Shah; Lyatt Jaeglé; Joel A Thornton; Felipe D Lopez-Hilfiker; Ben H Lee; Jason C Schroder; Pedro Campuzano-Jost; Jose L Jimenez; Hongyu Guo; Amy P Sullivan; Rodney J Weber; Jaime R Green; Marc N Fiddler; Solomon Bililign; Teresa L Campos; Meghan Stell; Andrew J Weinheimer; Denise D Montzka; Steven S Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Modeling NH4NO3 Over the San Joaquin Valley During the 2013 DISCOVER-AQ Campaign.

Authors:  James T Kelly; Caroline L Parworth; Qi Zhang; David J Miller; Kang Sun; Mark A Zondlo; Kirk R Baker; Armin Wisthaler; John B Nowak; Sally E Pusede; Ronald C Cohen; Andrew J Weinheimer; Andreas J Beyersdorf; Gail S Tonnesen; Jesse O Bash; Luke C Valin; James H Crawford; Alan Fried; James G Walega
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.261

9.  Development and evaluation of a physics-based windblown dust emission scheme implemented in the CMAQ modeling system.

Authors:  H Foroutan; J Young; S Napelenok; L Ran; K W Appel; R C Gilliam; J E Pleim
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.660

10.  Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1.

Authors:  K Wyat Appel; Sergey L Napelenok; Kristen M Foley; Havala O T Pye; Christian Hogrefe; Deborah J Luecken; Jesse O Bash; Shawn J Roselle; Jonathan E Pleim; Hosein Foroutan; William T Hutzell; George A Pouliot; Golam Sarwar; Kathleen M Fahey; Brett Gantt; Robert C Gilliam; Nicholas K Heath; Daiwen Kang; Rohit Mathur; Donna B Schwede; Tanya L Spero; David C Wong; Jeffrey O Young
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.135

View more
  15 in total

1.  Meteorological and Air Quality Modeling for Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.

Authors:  K R Baker; T K V Nguyen; N Sareen; B H Henderson
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  A comparative study of two-way and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US: performance evaluation and impacts of chemistry-meteorology feedbacks on air quality.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Yang Zhang; Shaocai Yu; David C Wong; Jonathan Pleim; Rohit Mathur; James T Kelly; Michelle Bell
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 6.135

3.  The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation.

Authors:  K Wyat Appel; Jesse O Bash; Kathleen M Fahey; Kristen M Foley; Robert C Gilliam; Christian Hogrefe; William T Hutzell; Daiwen Kang; Rohit Mathur; Benjamin N Murphy; Sergey L Napelenok; Christopher G Nolte; Jonathan E Pleim; George A Pouliot; Havala O T Pye; Limei Ran; Shawn J Roselle; Golam Sarwar; Donna B Schwede; Fahim I Sidi; Tanya L Spero; David C Wong
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.135

4.  Coupled Air Quality and Boundary-Layer Meteorology in Western U.S. Basins during Winter: Design and Rationale for a Comprehensive Study.

Authors:  A Gannet Hallar; Steven S Brown; Erik Crosman; Kelley Barsanti; Christopher D Cappa; Ian Faloona; Jerome Fast; Heather A Holmes; John Horel; John Lin; Ann Middlebrook; Logan Mitchell; Jennifer Murphy; Caroline C Womack; Viney Aneja; Munkhbayar Baasandorj; Roya Bahreini; Robert Banta; Casey Bray; Alan Brewer; Dana Caulton; Joost de Gouw; Stephan F J De Wekker; Delphine K Farmer; Cassandra J Gaston; Sebastian Hoch; Francesca Hopkins; Nakul N Karle; James T Kelly; Kerry Kelly; Neil Lareau; Keding Lu; Roy L Mauldin; Derek V Mallia; Randal Martin; Daniel Mendoza; Holly J Oldroyd; Yelena Pichugina; Kerri A Pratt; Pablo Saide; Phillip J Silva; William Simpson; Britton B Stephens; Jochen Stutz; Amy Sullivan
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 9.116

5.  The Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling System: Overview and Recommendations for Future Development.

Authors:  Raleigh R Hood; Gary W Shenk; Rachel L Dixon; Sean M C Smith; William P Ball; Jesse O Bash; Rich Batiuk; Kathy Boomer; Damian C Brady; Carl Cerco; Peter Claggett; Kim de Mutsert; Zachary M Easton; Andrew J Elmore; Marjorie A M Friedrichs; Lora A Harris; Thomas F Ihde; Iara Lacher; Li Li; Lewis C Linker; Andrew Miller; Julia Moriarty; Gregory B Noe; George Onyullo; Kenneth Rose; Katie Skalak; Richard Tian; Tamie L Veith; Lisa Wainger; Donald Weller; Yinglong Joseph Zhang
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.512

6.  Examining PM2.5 concentrations and exposure using multiple models.

Authors:  James T Kelly; Carey Jang; Brian Timin; Qian Di; Joel Schwartz; Yang Liu; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Veronica Berrocal; Michelle L Bell
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Furthering a partnership: Air quality modeling and improving public health.

Authors:  Sherri W Hunt; Darrell A Winner; Karen Wesson; James T Kelly
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.235

8.  Evaluation of 15 years of modeled atmospheric oxidized nitrogen compounds across the contiguous United States.

Authors:  Claudia Toro; Kristen Foley; Heather Simon; Barron Henderson; Kirk R Baker; Alison Eyth; Brian Timin; Wyat Appel; Deborah Luecken; Megan Beardsley; Darrell Sonntag; Norm Possiel; Sarah Roberts
Journal:  Elementa (Wash D C)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Contribution of Organic Nitrates to Organic Aerosol over South Korea during KORUS-AQ.

Authors:  Hannah S Kenagy; Paul S Romer Present; Paul J Wooldridge; Benjamin A Nault; Pedro Campuzano-Jost; Douglas A Day; Jose L Jimenez; Azimeh Zare; Havala O T Pye; Jinhyeok Yu; Chul H Song; Donald R Blake; Jung-Hun Woo; Younha Kim; Ronald C Cohen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Monthly Patterns of Ammonia Over the Contiguous United States at 2-km Resolution.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Xuehui Guo; Da Pan; James T Kelly; Jesse O Bash; Kang Sun; Fabien Paulot; Lieven Clarisse; Martin Van Damme; Simon Whitburn; Pierre-François Coheur; Cathy Clerbaux; Mark A Zondlo
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.720

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.