Literature DB >> 34676058

The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation.

K Wyat Appel1, Jesse O Bash1, Kathleen M Fahey1, Kristen M Foley1, Robert C Gilliam1, Christian Hogrefe1, William T Hutzell1, Daiwen Kang1, Rohit Mathur1, Benjamin N Murphy1, Sergey L Napelenok1, Christopher G Nolte1, Jonathan E Pleim1, George A Pouliot1, Havala O T Pye1, Limei Ran1, Shawn J Roselle1, Golam Sarwar1, Donna B Schwede1, Fahim I Sidi1, Tanya L Spero1, David C Wong1.   

Abstract

The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.3 (CMAQ53), released to the public in August 2019 and followed by version 5.3.1 (CMAQ531) in December 2019, contains numerous science updates, enhanced functionality, and improved computation efficiency relative to the previous version of the model, 5.2.1 (CMAQ521). Major science advances in the new model include a new aerosol module (AERO7) with significant updates to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) chemistry, updated chlorine chemistry, updated detailed bromine and iodine chemistry, updated simple halogen chemistry, the addition of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) chemistry in the CB6r3 chemical mechanism, updated M3Dry bidirectional deposition model, and the new Surface Tiled Aerosol and Gaseous Exchange (STAGE) bidirectional deposition model. In addition, support for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model's hybrid vertical coordinate (HVC) was added to CMAQ53 and the Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP) version 5.0 (MCIP50). Enhanced functionality in CMAQ53 includes the new Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation and Diagnostic (DESID) system for scaling incoming emissions to CMAQ and reading multiple gridded input emission files. Evaluation of CMAQ531 was performed by comparing monthly and seasonal mean daily 8 h average (MDA8) O3 and daily PM2.5 values from several CMAQ531 simulations to a similarly configured CMAQ521 simulation encompassing 2016. For MDA8 O3, CMAQ531 has higher O3 in the winter versus CMAQ521, due primarily to reduced dry deposition to snow, which strongly reduces wintertime O3 bias (2-4 ppbv monthly average). MDA8 O3 is lower with CMAQ531 throughout the rest of the year, particularly in spring, due in part to reduced O3 from the lateral boundary conditions (BCs), which generally increases MDA8 O3 bias in spring and fall ( 0.5 μg m-3). For daily 24 h average PM2.5, CMAQ531 has lower concentrations on average in spring and fall, higher concentrations in summer, and similar concentrations in winter to CMAQ521, which slightly increases bias in spring and fall and reduces bias in summer. Comparisons were also performed to isolate updates to several specific aspects of the modeling system, namely the lateral BCs, meteorology model version, and the deposition model used. Transitioning from a hemispheric CMAQ (HCMAQ) version 5.2.1 simulation to a HCMAQ version 5.3 simulation to provide lateral BCs contributes to higher O3 mixing ratios in the regional CMAQ simulation in higher latitudes during winter (due to the decreased O3 dry deposition to snow in CMAQ53) and lower O3 mixing ratios in middle and lower latitudes year-round (due to reduced O3 over the ocean with CMAQ53). Transitioning from WRF version 3.8 to WRF version 4.1.1 with the HVC resulted in consistently higher (1.0-1.5 ppbv) MDA8 O3 mixing ratios and higher PM2.5 concentrations (0.1-0.25 μg m-3) throughout the year. Finally, comparisons of the M3Dry and STAGE deposition models showed that MDA8 O3 is generally higher with M3Dry outside of summer, while PM2.5 is consistently higher with STAGE due to differences in the assumptions of particle deposition velocities to non-vegetated surfaces and land use with short vegetation (e.g., grasslands) between the two models. For ambient NH3, STAGE has slightly higher concentrations and smaller bias in the winter, spring, and fall, while M3Dry has higher concentrations and smaller bias but larger error and lower correlation in the summer.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34676058      PMCID: PMC8525427          DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-2867-2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geosci Model Dev        ISSN: 1991-959X            Impact factor:   6.135


  31 in total

1.  Model representation of secondary organic aerosol in CMAQv4.7.

Authors:  Annmarie G Carlton; Prakash V Bhave; Sergey L Napelenok; Edward O Edney; Golam Sarwar; Robert W Pinder; George A Pouliot; Marc Houyoux
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Epoxide pathways improve model predictions of isoprene markers and reveal key role of acidity in aerosol formation.

Authors:  Havala O T Pye; Robert W Pinder; Ivan R Piletic; Ying Xie; Shannon L Capps; Ying-Hsuan Lin; Jason D Surratt; Zhenfa Zhang; Avram Gold; Deborah J Luecken; William T Hutzell; Mohammed Jaoui; John H Offenberg; Tadeusz E Kleindienst; Michael Lewandowski; Edward O Edney
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Multipollutant modeling of ozone, reactive nitrogen and HAPs across the continental US with CMAQ-CB6.

Authors:  D J Luecken; G Yarwood; W T Hutzell
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Impacts of different characterizations of large-scale background on simulated regional-scale ozone over the continental United States.

Authors:  Christian Hogrefe; Peng Liu; George Pouliot; Rohit Mathur; Shawn Roselle; Johannes Flemming; Meiyun Lin; Rokjin J Park
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 6.133

5.  Assessing PM2.5 Model Performance for the Conterminous U.S. with Comparison to Model Performance Statistics from 2007-2015.

Authors:  James T Kelly; Shannon N Koplitz; Kirk R Baker; Amara L Holder; Havala O T Pye; Benjamin N Murphy; Jesse O Bash; Barron H Henderson; Norm Possiel; Heather Simon; Alison M Eyth; Carey Jang; Sharon Phillips; Brian Timin
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Monoterpenes are the largest source of summertime organic aerosol in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  Haofei Zhang; Lindsay D Yee; Ben H Lee; Michael P Curtis; David R Worton; Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz; John H Offenberg; Michael Lewandowski; Tadeusz E Kleindienst; Melinda R Beaver; Amara L Holder; William A Lonneman; Kenneth S Docherty; Mohammed Jaoui; Havala O T Pye; Weiwei Hu; Douglas A Day; Pedro Campuzano-Jost; Jose L Jimenez; Hongyu Guo; Rodney J Weber; Joost de Gouw; Abigail R Koss; Eric S Edgerton; William Brune; Claudia Mohr; Felipe D Lopez-Hilfiker; Anna Lutz; Nathan M Kreisberg; Steve R Spielman; Susanne V Hering; Kevin R Wilson; Joel A Thornton; Allen H Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A framework for expanding aqueous chemistry in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.1.

Authors:  Kathleen M Fahey; Annmarie G Carlton; Havala O T Pye; Jaemeen Baek; William T Hutzell; Charles O Stanier; Kirk R Baker; K Wyat Appel; Mohammed Jaoui; John H Offenberg
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.135

8.  A simple lightning assimilation technique for improving retrospective WRF simulations.

Authors:  Nicholas K Heath; Jonathan E Pleim; Robert C Gilliam; Daiwen Kang
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.660

9.  An Integrated Agriculture, Atmosphere, and Hydrology Modeling System for Ecosystem Assessments.

Authors:  L Ran; Y Yuan; E Cooter; V Benson; D Yang; J Pleim; R Wang; J Williams
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.660

10.  Simulating lightning NO production in CMAQv5.2: evolution of scientific updates.

Authors:  Daiwen Kang; Kenneth E Pickering; Dale J Allen; Kristen M Foley; David C Wong; Rohit Mathur; Shawn J Roselle
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 6.135

View more
  12 in total

1.  Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation from volatile chemical products.

Authors:  Elyse A Pennington; Karl M Seltzer; Benjamin N Murphy; Momei Qin; John H Seinfeld; Havala O T Pye
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.133

2.  Human-health impacts of controlling secondary air pollution precursors.

Authors:  Havala O T Pye; K Wyat Appel; Karl M Seltzer; Cavin K Ward-Caviness; Benjamin N Murphy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2022-02-08

3.  Regional temperature-ozone relationships across the U.S. under multiple climate and emissions scenarios.

Authors:  Christopher G Nolte; Tanya L Spero; Jared H Bowden; Marcus C Sarofim; Jeremy Martinich; Megan S Mallard
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.636

4.  Development and evaluation of an advanced National Air Quality Forecasting Capability using the NOAA Global Forecast System version 16.

Authors:  Patrick C Campbell; Youhua Tang; Pius Lee; Barry Baker; Daniel Tong; Rick Saylor; Ariel Stein; Jianping Huang; Ho-Chun Huang; Edward Strobach; Jeff McQueen; Li Pan; Ivanka Stajner; Jamese Sims; Jose Tirado-Delgado; Youngsun Jung; Fanglin Yang; Tanya L Spero; Robert C Gilliam
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.892

5.  Hydrogen chloride (HCl) at ground sites during CalNex 2010 and insight into its thermodynamic properties.

Authors:  Ye Tao; Trevor C VandenBoer; Patrick R Veres; Carsten Warneke; Joost A de Gouw; Rodney J Weber; Milos Z Markovic; Yongjing Zhao; Kirk R Baker; James T Kelly; Jennifer G Murphy; Cora J Young; James M Roberts
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 5.217

6.  The Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling System: Overview and Recommendations for Future Development.

Authors:  Raleigh R Hood; Gary W Shenk; Rachel L Dixon; Sean M C Smith; William P Ball; Jesse O Bash; Rich Batiuk; Kathy Boomer; Damian C Brady; Carl Cerco; Peter Claggett; Kim de Mutsert; Zachary M Easton; Andrew J Elmore; Marjorie A M Friedrichs; Lora A Harris; Thomas F Ihde; Iara Lacher; Li Li; Lewis C Linker; Andrew Miller; Julia Moriarty; Gregory B Noe; George Onyullo; Kenneth Rose; Katie Skalak; Richard Tian; Tamie L Veith; Lisa Wainger; Donald Weller; Yinglong Joseph Zhang
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.512

7.  Volatile Chemical Product Enhancements to Criteria Pollutants in the United States.

Authors:  Karl M Seltzer; Benjamin N Murphy; Elyse A Pennington; Chris Allen; Kevin Talgo; Havala O T Pye
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 11.357

8.  Technical note: AQMEII4 Activity 1: evaluation of wet and dry deposition schemes as an integral part of regional-scale air quality models.

Authors:  Stefano Galmarini; Paul Makar; Olivia E Clifton; Christian Hogrefe; Jesse O Bash; Roberto Bellasio; Roberto Bianconi; Johannes Bieser; Tim Butler; Jason Ducker; Johannes Flemming; Alma Hodzic; Christopher D Holmes; Ioannis Kioutsioukis; Richard Kranenburg; Aurelia Lupascu; Juan Luis Perez-Camanyo; Jonathan Pleim; Young-Hee Ryu; Roberto San Jose; Donna Schwede; Sam Silva; Ralf Wolke
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 7.197

9.  Predicting wildfire particulate matter and hypothetical re-emission of radiological Cs-137 contamination incidents.

Authors:  Kirk R Baker; Sang Don Lee; Paul Lemieux; Scott Hudson; Benjamin N Murphy; Jesse O Bash; Shannon N Koplitz; Thien Khoi V Nguyen; Wei Min Hao; Stephen Baker; Emily Lincoln
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 10.753

10.  Secondary organic aerosol association with cardiorespiratory disease mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Havala O T Pye; Cavin K Ward-Caviness; Ben N Murphy; K Wyat Appel; Karl M Seltzer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.