Literature DB >> 35237388

A comparative study of two-way and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US: performance evaluation and impacts of chemistry-meteorology feedbacks on air quality.

Kai Wang1, Yang Zhang1, Shaocai Yu2, David C Wong3, Jonathan Pleim3, Rohit Mathur3, James T Kelly4, Michelle Bell5.   

Abstract

The two-way coupled Weather Research and Forecasting and Community Multiscale Air Quality (WRF-CMAQ) model has been developed to more realistically represent the atmosphere by accounting for complex chemistry-meteorology feedbacks. In this study, we present a comparative analysis of two-way (with consideration of both aerosol direct and indirect effects) and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US. Long-term (5 years from 2008 to 2012) simulations using WRF-CMAQ with both offline and two-way coupling modes are carried out with anthropogenic emissions based on multiple years of the U.S. National Emission Inventory and chemical initial and boundary conditions derived from an advanced Earth system model (i.e., a modified version of the Community Earth System Model/Community Atmospheric Model). The comprehensive model evaluations show that both two-way WRF-CMAQ and WRF-only simulations perform well for major meteorological variables such as temperature at 2 m, relative humidity at 2 m, wind speed at 10 m, precipitation (except for against the National Climatic Data Center data), and shortwave and longwave radiation. Both two-way and offline CMAQ also show good performance for ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Due to the consideration of aerosol direct and indirect effects, two-way WRF-CMAQ shows improved performance over offline coupled WRF and CMAQ in terms of spatiotemporal distributions and statistics, especially for radiation, cloud forcing, O3, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, elemental carbon, tropospheric O3 residual, and column nitrogen dioxide (NO2). For example, the mean biases have been reduced by more than 10 W m-2 for shortwave radiation and cloud radiative forcing and by more than 2 ppb for max 8 h O3. However, relatively large biases still exist for cloud predictions, some PM2.5 species, and PM10 that warrant follow-up studies to better understand those issues. The impacts of chemistry-meteorological feedbacks are found to play important roles in affecting regional air quality in the US by reducing domain-average concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO), O3, nitrogen oxide (NO x ), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and PM2.5 by 3.1% (up to 27.8%), 4.2% (up to 16.2%), 6.6% (up to 50.9%), 5.8% (up to 46.6%), and 8.6% (up to 49.1%), respectively, mainly due to reduced radiation, temperature, and wind speed. The overall performance of the two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ model achieved in this work is generally good or satisfactory and the improved performance for two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ should be considered along with other factors in developing future model applications to inform policy making.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35237388      PMCID: PMC8883479          DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-7189-2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geosci Model Dev        ISSN: 1991-959X            Impact factor:   6.135


  17 in total

1.  Hybrid Modeling Approach to Estimate Exposures of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) for the National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA).

Authors:  Richard D Scheffe; Madeleine Strum; Sharon B Phillips; James Thurman; Alison Eyth; Steve Fudge; Mark Morris; Ted Palma; Richard Cook
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Marginal PM25: Nonlinear Aerosol Mass Response to Sulfate Reductions in the Eastern United States.

Authors:  J Jason West; Asif S Ansari; Spyros N Pandis
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Climate-driven ground-level ozone extreme in the fall over the Southeast United States.

Authors:  Yuzhong Zhang; Yuhang Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Extending the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System to Hemispheric Scales: Overview of Process Considerations and Initial Applications.

Authors:  Rohit Mathur; Jia Xing; Robert Gilliam; Golam Sarwar; Christian Hogrefe; Jonathan Pleim; George Pouliot; Shawn Roselle; Tanya L Spero; David C Wong; Jeffrey Young
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

5.  Assessing PM2.5 Model Performance for the Conterminous U.S. with Comparison to Model Performance Statistics from 2007-2015.

Authors:  James T Kelly; Shannon N Koplitz; Kirk R Baker; Amara L Holder; Havala O T Pye; Benjamin N Murphy; Jesse O Bash; Barron H Henderson; Norm Possiel; Heather Simon; Alison M Eyth; Carey Jang; Sharon Phillips; Brian Timin
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  The Impact of Iodide-Mediated Ozone Deposition and Halogen Chemistry on Surface Ozone Concentrations Across the Continental United States.

Authors:  Brett Gantt; Golam Sarwar; Jia Xing; Heather Simon; Donna Schwede; William T Hutzell; Rohit Mathur; Alfonso Saiz-Lopez
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  The impact of the direct effect of aerosols on meteorology and air quality using aerosol optical depth assimilation during the KORUS-AQ campaign.

Authors:  Jia Jung; Amir H Souri; David C Wong; Sojin Lee; Wonbae Jeon; Jhoon Kim; Yunsoo Choi
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.261

8.  Unexpected Benefits of Reducing Aerosol Cooling Effects.

Authors:  Jia Xing; Jiandong Wang; Rohit Mathur; Jonathan Pleim; Shuxiao Wang; Christian Hogrefe; Chuen-Meei Gan; David C Wong; Jiming Hao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1.

Authors:  K Wyat Appel; Sergey L Napelenok; Kristen M Foley; Havala O T Pye; Christian Hogrefe; Deborah J Luecken; Jesse O Bash; Shawn J Roselle; Jonathan E Pleim; Hosein Foroutan; William T Hutzell; George A Pouliot; Golam Sarwar; Kathleen M Fahey; Brett Gantt; Robert C Gilliam; Nicholas K Heath; Daiwen Kang; Rohit Mathur; Donna B Schwede; Tanya L Spero; David C Wong; Jeffrey O Young
Journal:  Geosci Model Dev       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.135

10.  On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass.

Authors:  Havala O T Pye; Benjamin N Murphy; Lu Xu; Nga L Ng; Annmarie G Carlton; Hongyu Guo; Rodney Weber; Petros Vasilakos; K Wyat Appel; Sri Hapsari Budisulistiorini; Jason D Surratt; Athanasios Nenes; Weiwei Hu; Jose L Jimenez; Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz; Pawel K Misztal; Allen H Goldstein
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

View more
  1 in total

1.  Performance Evaluation of the Meteorology and Air Quality Conditions From Multiscale WRF-CMAQ Simulations for the Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study (LISTOS).

Authors:  Ana Torres-Vazquez; Jonathan Pleim; Robert Gilliam; George Pouliot
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.217

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.