Literature DB >> 33166538

Examining PM2.5 concentrations and exposure using multiple models.

James T Kelly1, Carey Jang2, Brian Timin2, Qian Di3, Joel Schwartz4, Yang Liu5, Aaron van Donkelaar6, Randall V Martin7, Veronica Berrocal8, Michelle L Bell9.   

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have found associations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure and adverse health effects using exposure models that incorporate monitoring data and other relevant information. Here, we use nine PM2.5 concentration models (i.e., exposure models) that span a wide range of methods to investigate i) PM2.5 concentrations in 2011, ii) potential changes in PM2.5 concentrations between 2011 and 2028 due to on-the-books regulations, and iii) PM2.5 exposure for the U.S. population and four racial/ethnic groups. The exposure models included two geophysical chemical transport models (CTMs), two interpolation methods, a satellite-derived aerosol optical depth-based method, a Bayesian statistical regression model, and three data-rich machine learning methods. We focused on annual predictions that were regridded to 12-km resolution over the conterminous U.S., but also considered 1-km predictions in sensitivity analyses. The exposure models predicted broadly consistent PM2.5 concentrations, with relatively high concentrations on average over the eastern U.S. and greater variability in the western U.S. However, differences in national concentration distributions (median standard deviation: 1.00 μg m-3) and spatial distributions over urban areas were evident. Further exploration of these differences and their implications for specific applications would be valuable. PM2.5 concentrations were estimated to decrease by about 1 μg m-3 on average due to modeled emission changes between 2011 and 2028, with decreases of more than 3 μg m-3 in areas with relatively high 2011 concentrations that were projected to experience relatively large emission reductions. Agreement among models was closer for population-weighted than uniformly weighted averages across the domain. About 50% of the population was estimated to experience PM2.5 concentrations less than 10 μg m-3 in 2011 and PM2.5 improvements of about 2 μg m-3 due to modeled emission changes between 2011 and 2028. Two inequality metrics were used to characterize differences in exposure among the four racial/ethnic groups. The metrics generally yielded consistent information and suggest that the modeled emission reductions between 2011 and 2028 would reduce absolute exposure inequality on average. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air quality modeling; Ensemble modeling; Exposure inequality; PM(2.5)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33166538      PMCID: PMC8102649          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  38 in total

1.  Racial isolation and exposure to airborne particulate matter and ozone in understudied US populations: Environmental justice applications of downscaled numerical model output.

Authors:  Mercedes A Bravo; Rebecca Anthopolos; Michelle L Bell; Marie Lynn Miranda
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Fine Particulate Air Pollution from Electricity Generation in the US: Health Impacts by Race, Income, and Geography.

Authors:  Maninder P S Thind; Christopher W Tessum; Inês L Azevedo; Julian D Marshall
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Amy D Lamson; Susan C Anenberg; Karen Wesson; David Risley; Bryan J Hubbell
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Air Pollution and Mortality in the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Qian Di; Yan Wang; Antonella Zanobetti; Yun Wang; Petros Koutrakis; Christine Choirat; Francesca Dominici; Joel D Schwartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for creating national daily maps of ambient PM2.5 concentration.

Authors:  Veronica J Berrocal; Yawen Guan; Amanda Muyskens; Haoyu Wang; Brian J Reich; James A Mulholland; Howard H Chang
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Methods, availability, and applications of PM2.5 exposure estimates derived from ground measurements, satellite, and atmospheric models.

Authors:  Minghui Diao; Tracey Holloway; Seohyun Choi; Susan M O'Neill; Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan; Aaron Van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Xiaomeng Jin; Arlene M Fiore; Daven K Henze; Forrest Lacey; Patrick L Kinney; Frank Freedman; Narasimhan K Larkin; Yufei Zou; James T Kelly; Ambarish Vaidyanathan
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Associations of mortality with long-term exposures to fine and ultrafine particles, species and sources: results from the California Teachers Study Cohort.

Authors:  Bart Ostro; Jianlin Hu; Debbie Goldberg; Peggy Reynolds; Andrew Hertz; Leslie Bernstein; Michael J Kleeman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Comparison of geostatistical interpolation and remote sensing techniques for estimating long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5 concentrations across the continental United States.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Lee; Marc L Serre; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Richard T Burnett; Michael Jerrett
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Environmental inequality in exposures to airborne particulate matter components in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Keita Ebisu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Comparing the Health Effects of Ambient Particulate Matter Estimated Using Ground-Based versus Remote Sensing Exposure Estimates.

Authors:  Michael Jerrett; Michelle C Turner; Bernardo S Beckerman; C Arden Pope; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Marc Serre; Dan Crouse; Susan M Gapstur; Daniel Krewski; W Ryan Diver; Patricia F Coogan; George D Thurston; Richard T Burnett
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

1.  Air pollution exposure disparities in US public housing developments.

Authors:  Jayajit Chakraborty; Timothy W Collins; Sara E Grineski; Jacob J Aun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Flexible Bayesian Ensemble Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Local Ozone Concentrations.

Authors:  Xiang Ren; Zhongyuan Mi; Ting Cai; Christopher G Nolte; Panos G Georgopoulos
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 11.357

3.  Short-term PM2.5 and cardiovascular admissions in NY State: assessing sensitivity to exposure model choice.

Authors:  Mike Z He; Vivian Do; Siliang Liu; Patrick L Kinney; Arlene M Fiore; Xiaomeng Jin; Nicholas DeFelice; Jianzhao Bi; Yang Liu; Tabassum Z Insaf; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Assessing the health estimation capacity of air pollution exposure prediction models.

Authors:  Jenna R Krall; Joshua P Keller; Roger D Peng
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Short-Term PM2.5 Air Pollution Exposures in the United States.

Authors:  Timothy W Collins; Sara E Grineski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 11.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.