Literature DB >> 27964698

Development of the crop residue and rangeland burning in the 2014 National Emissions Inventory using information from multiple sources.

George Pouliot1, Venkatesh Rao2, Jessica L McCarty3, Amber Soja4.   

Abstract

Biomass burning has been identified as an important contributor to the degradation of air quality because of its impact on ozone and particulate matter. One component of the biomass burning inventory, crop residue burning, has been poorly characterized in the National Emissions Inventory (NEI). In the 2011 NEI, wildland fires, prescribed fires, and crop residue burning collectively were the largest source of PM2.5. This paper summarizes our 2014 NEI method to estimate crop residue burning emissions and grass/pasture burning emissions using remote sensing data and field information and literature-based, crop-specific emission factors. We focus on both the postharvest and pre-harvest burning that takes place with bluegrass, corn, cotton, rice, soybeans, sugarcane and wheat. Estimates for 2014 indicate that over the continental United States (CONUS), crop residue burning excluding all areas identified as Pasture/Grass, Grassland Herbaceous, and Pasture/Hay occurred over approximately 1.5 million acres of land and produced 19,600 short tons of PM2.5. For areas identified as Pasture/Grass, Grassland Herbaceous, and Pasture/Hay, biomass burning emissions occurred over approximately 1.6 million acres of land and produced 30,000 short tons of PM2.5. This estimate compares with the 2011 NEI and 2008 NEI as follows: 2008: 49,650 short tons and 2011: 141,180 short tons. Note that in the previous two NEIs rangeland burning was not well defined and so the comparison is not exact. The remote sensing data also provided verification of our existing diurnal profile for crop residue burning emissions used in chemical transport modeling. In addition, the entire database used to estimate this sector of emissions is available on EPA's Clearinghouse for Inventories and Emission Factors (CHIEF, http://www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/index.html ). IMPLICATIONS: Estimates of crop residue burning and rangeland burning emissions can be improved by using satellite detections. Local information is helpful in distinguishing crop residue and rangeland burning from all other types of fires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27964698      PMCID: PMC6088810          DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1268982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  5 in total

Review 1.  Air pollution and health.

Authors:  Bert Brunekreef; Stephen T Holgate
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Global air quality and pollution.

Authors:  Hajime Akimoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The spatial and temporal distribution of crop residue burning in the contiguous United States.

Authors:  Jessica L McCarty; Stefania Korontzi; Christopher O Justice; Tatiana Loboda
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Remote sensing-based estimates of annual and seasonal emissions from crop residue burning in the contiguous United States.

Authors:  Jessica L McCarty
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  A pervasive role for biomass burning in tropical high ozone/low water structures.

Authors:  Daniel C Anderson; Julie M Nicely; Ross J Salawitch; Timothy P Canty; Russell R Dickerson; Thomas F Hanisco; Glenn M Wolfe; Eric C Apel; Elliot Atlas; Thomas Bannan; Stephane Bauguitte; Nicola J Blake; James F Bresch; Teresa L Campos; Lucy J Carpenter; Mark D Cohen; Mathew Evans; Rafael P Fernandez; Brian H Kahn; Douglas E Kinnison; Samuel R Hall; Neil R P Harris; Rebecca S Hornbrook; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Michael Le Breton; James D Lee; Carl Percival; Leonhard Pfister; R Bradley Pierce; Daniel D Riemer; Alfonso Saiz-Lopez; Barbara J B Stunder; Anne M Thompson; Kirk Ullmann; Adam Vaughan; Andrew J Weinheimer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Reflecting on progress since the 2005 NARSTO emissions inventory report.

Authors:  Melissa Day; George Pouliot; Sherri Hunt; Kirk R Baker; Megan Beardsley; Gregory Frost; David Mobley; Heather Simon; Barron B Henderson; Tiffany Yelverton; Venkatesh Rao
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Meteorological and Air Quality Modeling for Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.

Authors:  K R Baker; T K V Nguyen; N Sareen; B H Henderson
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Modeling crop residue burning experiments to evaluate smoke emissions and plume transport.

Authors:  Luxi Zhou; Kirk R Baker; Sergey L Napelenok; George Pouliot; Robert Elleman; Susan M O'Neill; Shawn P Urbanski; David C Wong
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Assessing PM2.5 Model Performance for the Conterminous U.S. with Comparison to Model Performance Statistics from 2007-2015.

Authors:  James T Kelly; Shannon N Koplitz; Kirk R Baker; Amara L Holder; Havala O T Pye; Benjamin N Murphy; Jesse O Bash; Barron H Henderson; Norm Possiel; Heather Simon; Alison M Eyth; Carey Jang; Sharon Phillips; Brian Timin
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Emissions from prescribed burning of agricultural fields in the Pacific Northwest.

Authors:  A L Holder; B K Gullett; S P Urbanski; R Elleman; S O'Neill; D Tabor; W Mitchell; K R Baker
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 6.  Respiratory and allergic health effects in children living near agriculture: A review.

Authors:  Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne; Shohreh F Farzan; Mitiasoa Razafy; Jill E Johnston
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 7.  Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel A Jaffe; Susan M O'Neill; Narasimhan K Larkin; Amara L Holder; David L Peterson; Jessica E Halofsky; Ana G Rappold
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.235

8.  Impacts of Sugarcane Fires on Air Quality and Public Health in South Florida.

Authors:  Holly K Nowell; Charles Wirks; Maria Val Martin; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Christopher K Uejio; Christopher D Holmes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 11.035

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.