Literature DB >> 34675451

The Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling System: Overview and Recommendations for Future Development.

Raleigh R Hood1, Gary W Shenk2, Rachel L Dixon3, Sean M C Smith4, William P Ball3, Jesse O Bash5, Rich Batiuk6, Kathy Boomer7, Damian C Brady8, Carl Cerco9, Peter Claggett2, Kim de Mutsert10, Zachary M Easton11, Andrew J Elmore12, Marjorie A M Friedrichs13, Lora A Harris14, Thomas F Ihde15, Iara Lacher16, Li Li17, Lewis C Linker6, Andrew Miller18, Julia Moriarty19, Gregory B Noe20, George Onyullo21, Kenneth Rose1, Katie Skalak22, Richard Tian2, Tamie L Veith23, Lisa Wainger14, Donald Weller24, Yinglong Joseph Zhang13.   

Abstract

The Chesapeake Bay is the largest, most productive, and most biologically diverse estuary in the continental United States providing crucial habitat and natural resources for culturally and economically important species. Pressures from human population growth and associated development and agricultural intensification have led to excessive nutrient and sediment inputs entering the Bay, negatively affecting the health of the Bay ecosystem and the economic services it provides. The Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) is a unique program formally created in 1983 as a multi-stakeholder partnership to guide and foster restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. Since its inception, the CBP Partnership has been developing, updating, and applying a complex linked modeling system of watershed, airshed, and estuary models as a planning tool to inform strategic management decisions and Bay restoration efforts. This paper provides a description of the 2017 CBP Modeling System and the higher trophic level models developed by the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, along with specific recommendations that emerged from a 2018 workshop designed to inform future model development. Recommendations highlight the need for simulation of watershed inputs, conditions, processes, and practices at higher resolution to provide improved information to guide local nutrient and sediment management plans. More explicit and extensive modeling of connectivity between watershed landforms and estuary sub-areas, estuarine hydrodynamics, watershed and estuarine water quality, the estuarine-watershed socioecological system, and living resources will be important to broaden and improve characterization of responses to targeted nutrient and sediment load reductions. Finally, the value and importance of maintaining effective collaborations among jurisdictional managers, scientists, modelers, support staff, and stakeholder communities is emphasized. An open collaborative and transparent process has been a key element of successes to date and is vitally important as the CBP Partnership moves forward with modeling system improvements that help stakeholders evolve new knowledge, improve management strategies, and better communicate outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airshed Modeling; Biogeochemical Modeling; Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool; Chesapeake Bay Agreement; Chesapeake Bay Program; Environmental Protection Agency; Estuarine Modeling; Hydrodynamic Modeling; Living Resource Modeling; Modeling; NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office; Total Maximum Daily Load; Watershed Modeling

Year:  2021        PMID: 34675451      PMCID: PMC8525429          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Modell        ISSN: 0304-3800            Impact factor:   3.512


  34 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring for conservation.

Authors:  James D Nichols; Byron K Williams
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Combined monitoring and modeling indicate the most effective agricultural best management practices.

Authors:  Zachary M Easton; M Todd Walter; Tammo S Steenhuis
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  The Efficacy of Constructed Stream-Wetland Complexes at Reducing the Flux of Suspended Solids to Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Solange Filoso; Sean M C Smith; Michael R Williams; Margaret A Palmer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Long-term nutrient reductions lead to the unprecedented recovery of a temperate coastal region.

Authors:  Jonathan S Lefcheck; Robert J Orth; William C Dennison; David J Wilcox; Rebecca R Murphy; Jennifer Keisman; Cassie Gurbisz; Michael Hannam; J Brooke Landry; Kenneth A Moore; Christopher J Patrick; Jeremy Testa; Donald E Weller; Richard A Batiuk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Seasonal Manure Application Timing and Storage Effects on Field- and Watershed-Level Phosphorus Losses.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Tamie L Veith; Amy S Collick; Peter J A Kleinman; Douglas B Beegle; Ray B Bryant
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  From Hydrometeorology to River Water Quality: Can a Deep Learning Model Predict Dissolved Oxygen at the Continental Scale?

Authors:  Wei Zhi; Dapeng Feng; Wen-Ping Tsai; Gary Sterle; Adrian Harpold; Chaopeng Shen; Li Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Employing a socio-ecological systems approach to engage harmful algal bloom stakeholders.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Van Dolah; Michael Paolisso; Kevin Sellner; Allen Place
Journal:  Aquat Ecol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 1.641

8.  Water-Extractable Phosphorus in Animal Manure and Manure Compost: Quantities, Characteristics, and Temporal Changes.

Authors:  Jian Liu; John T Spargo; Peter J A Kleinman; Robert Meinen; Philip A Moore; Douglas B Beegle
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.751

Review 9.  Predicting changes in the distribution and abundance of species under environmental change.

Authors:  Johan Ehrlén; William F Morris
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 9.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.