Literature DB >> 31728231

Mid-term Clinical and Radiological Results of Oxford Phase 3 Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Yusuf Erdem1, Cagri Neyisci2, Cemil Yıldız1.   

Abstract

Introduction The popularity of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for the treatment of isolated compartment osteoarthritis of the knee has risen over the past two decades. Currently, UKA covers a considerable amount of all knee arthroplasties worldwide. The aim of this study was to present the clinical and radiological outcomes of UKA in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. Methods Between January 2010 and January 2014, mobile-bearing UKA was applied to 44 knees of 37 (three men, 34 women) patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. The mean age, body mass index (BMI), and follow-up were 54 ± 6.1, 26.3± 2.2, and 48 ± 9.4, respectively. Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and range of motion (ROM) were used for clinical assessment, and the Oxford Radiological Evaluation Criteria were used for radiological assessment. Results Compared to preoperative values, knee flexion increased from 116° to 123° (p<0.001). Statistically significant increases in OKS and KSS and decrease in VAS was obtained postoperatively (p<0.001). All of the components were aligned within the acceptable ranges radiologically. One bearing dislocation was revised and one conversion to TKA was performed during the 5.9-year follow-up. No major complications occurred, including infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary emboli, and neurovascular injury. Conclusion The mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of UKA were excellent in this study, and our results demonstrate that Oxford mobile-bearing UKA for the proper indication is effective, with considerable success in the treatment of medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis, regardless of age.
Copyright © 2019, Erdem et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medial compartment; osteoarthritis; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 31728231      PMCID: PMC6830537          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  29 in total

Review 1.  Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: literature review.

Authors:  Gaurav Khanna; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas M Brown; Neil P Sheth; Kenneth Davis; Mike E Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Surgeon, implant, and patient variables may explain variability in early revision rates reported for unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stefano Bini; Monti Khatod; Guy Cafri; Yuexin Chen; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr; D Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-03

Review 5.  Is unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) superior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alisara Arirachakaran; Pathompong Choowit; Chinundorn Putananon; Samart Muangsiri; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-13

6.  Cementless Oxford medial unicompartimental knee replacement: an independent series with a 5-year-follow-up.

Authors:  Benjamin Panzram; Ines Bertlich; Tobias Reiner; Tilman Walker; Sébastien Hagmann; Tobias Gotterbarm
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner?

Authors:  Matthew C Lyons; Steven J MacDonald; Lyndsay E Somerville; Douglas D Naudie; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Ulf Svard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Polyethylene wear in a non-congruous unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval analysis.

Authors:  T Ashraf; J H Newman; V V Desai; D Beard; J E Nevelos
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50s.

Authors:  S Parratte; J-N A Argenson; O Pearce; V Pauly; P Auquier; J-M Aubaniac
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  A novel radiographic technique to assess 180° rotational spin of the Oxford unicompartmental knee mobile bearing.

Authors:  Salman Jamshed; Rohi Shah; Arrish Arooj; Adrian Turner; Christos Plakogiannis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-26

2.  Therapeutic Effects Comparison and Revision Case Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients Under 60 years: A 2-6-year Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Zhang Ziqi; Mei Yufeng; Zhang Lei; Wang Chunsheng; Yang Pei; Wang Kunzheng
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.