Literature DB >> 19716706

Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartment knee replacement.

Bart M Kuipers1, Boudewijn J Kollen, Peter C Kaijser Bots, Bart J Burger, Jos J A M van Raay, Niek J A Tulp, Cees C P M Verheyen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of preoperative patellofemoral osteoarthritis, BMI and age for implant survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed in patients meeting strict admission criteria. The data and radiographs of 437 unilateral Oxford phase III procedures (Biomet, Bridgend, UK) were analysed. All procedures were carried out or supervised by 13 specialised knee surgeons in three different hospitals. The study group comprised 437 patients with a median follow of 2.6 years (0.1-7.9). The cumulative standard case survival rate at 5 years, when there were still 101 patients at risk, was 84.7% (CI-95%: 80.1-89.3%). Young age (<60 years) was associated with a 2.2-fold increased adjusted risk of revision (CI: 1.08-4.43; p=0.03). The preoperative presence of radiological features of patellofemoral osteoarthritis was associated with a 0.3-fold reduced adjusted risk of revision (CI: 0.11-0.89; p=0.03). BMI>30 kg/m(2), gender, the surgeon performing the operation (either as an individual or categorised by annual surgical UKA caseload, i.e., more or less than 10 UKAs) and the hospital in which surgery took place did not predict implant survival of UKA. We conclude that young patients (<60 years) experience an increased early risk of revision for UKA when compared to older patients (>60 years). Obesity (BMI>30 kg/m(2)) and preoperative patellofemoral osteoarthritis are not associated with a decreased implant survival and therefore should not be considered risk factors in this context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19716706     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  39 in total

1.  Effect of arthritis in other compartment after unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Mofidi; Bo Lu; Johannes F Plate; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-16

2.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice.

Authors:  William C Schroer; C Lowry Barnes; Paul Diesfeld; Angela LeMarr; Rachel Ingrassia; Diane J Morton; Mary Reedy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Causes of revision following Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Ricardo Postigo; Sowon Koo; Jong Hun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  [Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory].

Authors:  J Beckmann; M T Hirschmann; G Matziolis; J Holz; R V Eisenhart-Rothe; C Becher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Up to twelve year follow-up of the Oxford phase three unicompartmental knee replacement in China: seven hundred and eight knees from an independent centre.

Authors:  Huaming Xue; Yihui Tu; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis for the treatment of localized cartilage defects of the femoral condyles: a systematic review of clinical studies.

Authors:  Andreas Fuchs; Helge Eberbach; Kaywan Izadpanah; Gerrit Bode; Norbert P Südkamp; Matthias J Feucht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improves function in posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Sebastien Lustig; Sebastien Parratte; Robert A Magnussen; Jean-Noel Argenson; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Body mass index changes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty do not adversely influence patient outcomes.

Authors:  Zhan Xia; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Graham Seow-Hng Goh; Hwei Chi Chong; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  [The 2-year follow-up results of a patient-specific interpositional knee implant].

Authors:  F X Köck; J Beckmann; P Lechler; J Götz; J Schaumburger; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Early functional outcome after lateral UKA is sensitive to postoperative lower limb alignment.

Authors:  J P van der List; H Chawla; J C Villa; H A Zuiderbaan; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.