Literature DB >> 29113757

Eight Hundred Twenty-Five Medial Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: The First 10-Year US Multi-Center Survival Analysis.

Omar K Alnachoukati1, John W Barrington2, Keith R Berend3, Michael C Kolczun4, Roger H Emerson1, Adolph V Lombardi3, David R Mauerhan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: FDA approval for the Oxford phase III device was approved for use in the United States in 2004. This study seeks to provide the first long-term, large patient sample size, Oxford phase III multi-site survivorship study in the United States, investigating patient reported outcomes of pain and function, while also providing an in-depth analysis of causes for revision, and finally addressing recent advancements that can help aid the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) process and further improve partial knee survivorship.
METHODS: Between July 2004 and December 2006, 5 surgeons from around the United States performed medial UKA through the minimally invasive surgical approach, on 825 knees in 695 patients. This was a consecutive series of primary UKAs using the phase III mobile bearing; cemented Oxford Knee (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN), implanted utilizing phase III instrumentation. UKA survivorship considered all revisions as the end point. Implant survivorship eliminated revisions at which the original Oxford implant was determined to be well fixated and functional intra-operatively.
RESULTS: A total of 93 knees were revised in this study. Mean follow-up was 9.7 years (6-12). Implant survivorship at year 10 was 90% (confidence interval 2.7%). UKA survivorship at year 10 was 85% (confidence interval 3.8%). Average preoperative American Knee Society Score (knee score) was 49 and rose to 90 postoperatively (standard deviations 16 and 18, respectively). Average preoperative American Knee Society Score (function score) was 55 and rose to 77 postoperatively (standard deviations 15 and 28, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This was the first large-scale, 10-year, multi-site follow-up of the Oxford mobile-bearing medial UKA undertaken in the United States, displaying good survivorship and excellent patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  10-year survivorship; Oxford; United States; mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; multi-site

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29113757     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  19 in total

1.  Minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ensures excellent functional outcome and high survivorship in the long term.

Authors:  Tilman Walker; Pit Hetto; Thomas Bruckner; Tobias Gotterbarm; Christian Merle; Benjamin Panzram; Moritz M Innmann; Babak Moradi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Robotic-assisted surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does it improve the precision of the surgery and its clinical outcomes? Systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Negrín; Gonzalo Ferrer; Magaly Iñiguez; Jaime Duboy; Manuel Saavedra; Nicolas Reyes Larraín; Nicolas Jabes; Maximiliano Barahona
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-10-27

3.  Clinical results and short-term survivorship of robotic-arm-assisted medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Zambianchi; Giorgio Franceschi; Elisa Rivi; Federico Banchelli; Andrea Marcovigi; Claudio Khabbazè; Fabio Catani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Biomechanical analysis of sitting-up movement of knee joint after robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Gang Du; Zhengtian Li; Shan Lao; Ken Urish
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

5.  Clinical validation and accuracy testing of a radiographic decision aid for unicondylar knee arthroplasty patient selection in midterm follow-up.

Authors:  Lars-Rene Tuecking; P Savov; T Richter; H Windhagen; M Ettinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Kinematic alignment of medial UKA is safe: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charles Rivière; Sivan Sivaloganathan; Loic Villet; Philippe Cartier; Sébastien Lustig; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Revision indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mei Lin Tay; Sue R McGlashan; A Paul Monk; Simon W Young
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: survivorship analysis and function at 20 years follow up.

Authors:  Andrew J Porteous; James R A Smith; Rachel Bray; James R Robinson; Paul White; James R D Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Ten-Year Survivorship, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Satisfaction of a Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryland Kagan; Mike B Anderson; Travis Bailey; Aaron A Hofmann; Christopher E Pelt
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-04-06

10.  Limb position influences component orientation in Oxford mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an experimental cadaveric study.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar; Shantanu Patil; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.