Literature DB >> 8666621

Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.

J Dawson1, R Fitzpatrick, A Carr, D Murray.   

Abstract

We developed a 12-item questionnaire for completion by patients having total hip replacement (THR). A prospective study of 220 patients was undertaken before operation and at follow-up six months later. Each completed the new questionnaire as well as the SF36, and some the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). An orthopaedic surgeon assessed the Charnley hip score. The single score derived from the questionnaire had a high internal consistency. Reproducibility was examined by test-retest reliability and was found to be satisfactory. The validity of the questionnaire was established by obtaining significant correlation in the expected direction with the Charnley scores and relevant scales of the SF36 and the AIMS. Sensitivity to change was assessed by analysing the differences between the preoperative scores and those at the follow-up. The standardised effect size for the new questionnaire compared favourably with that for the SF36 and the AIMS. The new questionnaire provides a measure of outcome for THR which is short, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8666621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  342 in total

1.  A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; J M Norquist; C Jenkinson; B C Reeves; R W Morris; D W Murray; P J Gregg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Alastair Rothwell; Art Sedrakyan; Kate Eresian Chenok; Eric Bohm; Kevin J Bozic; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Mapping the Oxford hip score onto the EQ-5D utility index.

Authors:  Rafael A Pinedo-Villanueva; David Turner; Andrew Judge; James P Raftery; Nigel K Arden
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Atraumatic posterior dislocation of the native hip: an unusual presentation of septic arthritis.

Authors:  N K Patel; J Windley; S Naique
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-06-09

5.  Sporting and physical activity following hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Noel E Fisher; Vijay V Killampalli; Rakesh K Kundra; Nikolas A Jagodzinski; Keshav Mathur; Alex D Reading
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical assessment after total hip arthroplasty using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Tanzo Sugimori; Toru Ichiseki; Tadami Matsumoto; Yoshimitsu Hiejima
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-21

7.  A comparison of the omega and posterior approaches on patient reported function and radiological outcomes following total hip replacement.

Authors:  James R Berstock; Ashley W Blom; Michael R Whitehouse
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-24

8.  THE CLINICAL, FUNCTIONAL AND BIOMECHANICAL PRESENTATION OF PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC HIP ABDUCTOR TENDON TEARS.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Theertha Retheesh; Rinky Mutreja; Gregory C Janes
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10

9.  Chronic hip dislocations: a rarity. How should we treat them?

Authors:  V Selimi; O Heang; Y Kim; E Woelber; J Gollogly
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-09-23

10.  Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Helen Doll; Irene Boller; Ray Fitzpatrick; Christopher Little; Jonathan Rees; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.