Literature DB >> 32968338

A novel radiographic technique to assess 180° rotational spin of the Oxford unicompartmental knee mobile bearing.

Salman Jamshed1, Rohi Shah1, Arrish Arooj1, Adrian Turner2, Christos Plakogiannis1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The recognition of anteromedial knee arthritis as a distinct early clinicopathological entity has led to a resurgence in medial unicompartment knee arthroplasty (UKA). Symptomatic knee pain caused by 180° rotational spin of the mobile bearing of the Oxford Knee is an unrecognized and therefore under-reported complication of UKA. Whilst the post-operative radiographic criteria for optimal positioning of UKA is well described in the available literature, this isn't the case for assessing antero-posterior (AP) orientation of the mobile-bearing.
METHODS: Following a literature review, we describe a novel radiographic technique that can consistently assess AP orientation, and as a result, diagnose 180° rotational spin of the mobile-bearing. This technique overcomes the radiological challenge of superimposition of the radiopaque markers with the lateral edge of the tibial tray.
RESULTS: The modified oblique view results in clear visualization of the metallic rod embedded in the polyethylene, away from the lateral edge of the tibial tray. An anteriorly viewed metallic rod would indicate a well oriented mobile bearing. However, if the metallic beads are visualized anteriorly without dislocation, the component would have spun 180°.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for 180° spin to have occurred in patients with posterior dislocation with or without spontaneous reduction. We recommend bearing exchange ± revision arthroplasty for symptomatic patients. The modified oblique view is now part of our immediate post-operative XR protocol and repeated for any patient who re-presents symptomatically at any stage following the index procedure.
© 2020 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  180° rotational spin; Mobile-bearing; Modified oblique view; Unicompartment knee arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 32968338      PMCID: PMC7490449          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  34 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  S H White; P F Ludkowski; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-07

3.  Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  A D Liddle; H Pandit; A Judge; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.

Authors:  Paul N Baker; Timothy Petheram; Peter J Avery; Paul J Gregg; David J Deehan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medial pain and functional outcome in the medium term.

Authors:  Mark C Edmondson; David Isaac; Malin Wijeratna; Sean Brink; Paul Gibb; Paul Skinner
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for unexplained pain after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Shingo Hama; Daisuke Hamada; Tomohiro Goto; Takahiko Tsutsui; Ichiro Tonogai; Naoto Suzue; Tetsuya Matsuura; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  J Med Invest       Date:  2015

Review 7.  Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D W Murray; R W Parkinson
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50s.

Authors:  S Parratte; J-N A Argenson; O Pearce; V Pauly; P Auquier; J-M Aubaniac
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-03

9.  Ten- to 15-year results of the Oxford Phase III mobile unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective study from a non-designer group.

Authors:  L A Lisowski; L I Meijer; M P J van den Bekerom; P Pilot; A E Lisowski
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Gait comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties with healthy controls.

Authors:  G G Jones; M Kotti; A V Wiik; R Collins; M J Brevadt; R K Strachan; J P Cobb
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of a 1-mm difference in bearing thickness on intraoperative bearing movement and kinematics in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kohei Kawaguchi; Hiroshi Inui; Shuji Taketomi; Ryota Yamagami; Kenichi Kono; Shin Sameshima; Tomofumi Kage; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Marco Pilone; Karen Elsner; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.114

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.