Literature DB >> 31697427

Site-Selective Late-Stage Aromatic [18 F]Fluorination via Aryl Sulfonium Salts.

Peng Xu1, Da Zhao1, Florian Berger1, Aboubakr Hamad1, Jens Rickmeier1, Roland Petzold1, Mykhailo Kondratiuk1, Kostiantyn Bohdan1, Tobias Ritter1.   

Abstract

Site-selective functionalization of C-H bonds in small complex molecules is a long-standing challenge in organic chemistry. Herein, we report a broadly applicable and site-selective aromatic C-H dibenzothiophenylation reaction. The conceptual advantage of this transformation is further demonstrated through the two-step C-H [18 F]fluorination of a series of marketed small-molecule drugs.
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F labeling; C−H functionalization; fluorination; late-stage functionalization; radiochemistry

Year:  2019        PMID: 31697427      PMCID: PMC7004179          DOI: 10.1002/anie.201912567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


Over the past ten years, several promising new methods for the introduction of the 18F nucleus into small molecules have been disclosed, with the aim of improving clinical care and drug discovery through 18F positron‐emission tomography (PET).1, 2 However, implementation and translation to hospital settings is challenging if the fluorination reactions are operationally complex.3, 4 Unfortunately, the introduction of conventional leaving groups that can directly provide aryl fluorides upon reaction with fluoride cannot currently be accomplished at a late stage, so the requirement for de novo syntheses slows down the development of PET tracers (Scheme 1 a). Direct C−H fluorination in this regard is promising but selectivity becomes a substantial concern in every direct C−H functionalization reaction, especially for PET tracer synthesis because even small quantities of constitutional isomers must be separated (Scheme 1 b).5 There are few highly regioselective arene C−H functionalization reactions, and all of them either require suitable substitution patterns6a, 6d or directing groups,6b, 6c or afford functional groups that are not suitable for 18F fluorination.6e Herein, we report a highly selective and late‐stage C−H functionalization to afford aryl dibenzothiophenium salts, which can be converted into [18F]Ar‐F in a straightforward nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction simply by adding fluoride (Scheme 1). The C−H dibenzothiophenylation reaction developed herein proceeds in high selectivity for both small complex molecules and simple monosubstituted arenes to afford aryl dibenzothiophenium salts. Given its high selectivity and the operational simplicity, this two‐step method to quickly access [18F]Ar‐F by arene C−H functionalization holds promise for the acceleration of 18F PET development.
Scheme 1

Strategies for aromatic C−18F bond formation.

Strategies for aromatic C−18F bond formation. Some of the modern 18F fluorination reactions are starting to have an impact on the synthesis of structurally complex [18F]labeled small molecules that cannot be made by conventional nucleophilic aromatic substitution.7 Most notably, practical [18F]fluorodemetallation reactions mediated by copper that proceed on a large variety of small molecules have been developed by the groups of Gouverneur,7c Sanford and Scott,7f, 7h and Neumaier.7d Our group has reported deoxyfluorination reactions7g, 7i that in addition can also functionalize small peptides.7l Sanford, Scott, and co‐workers have described a Cu‐mediated two‐step [18F]fluorination of electron‐rich arenes using hypervalent iodine compounds.7j Nicewicz, Li, and co‐workers have developed a promising C−H to C‐18F fluorination reaction that does not require coordination directing groups and is enabled by laser‐photoredox catalysis.5d None of the useful functional groups for F18 introduction can currently be introduced selectively at a late stage in a general sense. Direct [18F]fluorination is desirable, but control of regioselectivity is challenging. Aryl sulfonium salts are good precursors for 18F labeling of arenes.8 Årstad and co‐workers have demonstrated that dibenzothiophene sulfonium salts can be efficiently converted into 18F‐labeled arenes for electron‐poor and electron‐neutral substrates, including several valuable PET tracers.8d However, reported methods for the preparation of aryl sulfonium salts often require aryl Grignard reagents, multistep syntheses from aryl halides, or strong acids as co‐solvents, none of which are suitable for site‐selective late‐stage incorporation.8, 9 Our previous approach through selective C−H thianthrenation10 can also provide access to aryl fluorides but requires an iridium‐catalyzed photoredox method,11 which adds additional challenges for implementation at good manufacturing practice (GMP) production facilities in radiopharmacies. Herein, we report a second highly selective arene C−H functionalization reaction, which differs conceptually from thianthrenation in that it can provide aryl sulfonium salts that can engage directly in C−F bond formation, simply through the addition of fluoride. Furthermore, we show how a group of three electronically different dibenzothiophenes designed for [18F]fluorination show a markedly expanded substrate scope compared to previous reported [18F]fluorinations of arylsulfonium compounds.8 Essential for the success of a site‐selective late‐stage 18F labeling method is the availability of a practical and general method to produce the precursors from readily available starting materials. We found that in the presence of acid anhydrides as activators,12 the reaction of bench‐stable dibenzothiophene S‐oxide with ethylbenzene afforded the corresponding dibenzothiophenium salt with high positional selectivity (p/o=50:1; p/m=100:1; Scheme 2). In contrast to previously reported arylthianthrenium salts, aryl dibenzothiophenium salts can provide aryl fluoride directly. For example, treatment of a biphenyl‐derived dibenzothiophenium salt with fluoride afforded the aryl fluoride in 84 % yield of isolated product, yet the corresponding thianthrenium salt gave the desired product in only 7 % yield with the wrong C−S cleavage product as the major side product (Scheme 2). The site‐selective C−H functionalization reaction developed herein exhibits broad substrate scope (Table 1). Both electron‐poor (2, 21–23) and electron‐rich (16, 24, 27) arenes proceed efficiently with high regioselectivity. Various functional groups are well tolerated, including halides (2, 21–24), nitriles (3), ethers (4–5, 20), esters (4, 10, 15), ketones (5), aldehydes (7), amides (5, 8, 25), and sulfonamides (9, 14). Heterocycles such as quinolines (12), imidazoles (19), and pyridines (20) are also compatible. Arenes that are more electron‐deficient than 1,2‐dichlorobenzene are too electron‐poor to react. The utility of our method for site‐selective late‐stage aromatic C−H functionalization is further demonstrated with the reactions of small complex substrates, drugs, agrochemicals, and natural products. For example, the dibenzothiophenium salt of fenofibrate (10) was obtained in 89 % yield of isolated product on a gram scale. For all the substrates shown in Table 1, analytically pure compounds can be obtained through simple chromatography on silica gel.
Scheme 2

Synthesis and fluorination of aryl sulfonium salts. TTO=thianthrene S‐oxide; DBTO=dibenzothiophene S‐oxide; B‐DBTO=3,7‐di‐tert‐butyldibenzothiophene S‐oxide; M‐DBTO=2,8‐dimethoxydibenzothiophene S‐oxide.

Table 1

Site‐selective aromatic C−H dibenzothiophenylation.

[a] Reaction condition A: 0.500 mmol arene, 2.00 to 4.00 equiv triflic acid (HOTf), 3.00 equiv trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) and 1.50 to 2.00 equiv DBTO or B‐DBTO in MeCN (2.0 mL, c=0.25 m), −40 °C to 25 °C. [b] Reaction condition B: 0.500 mmol arene, 1.50 to 2.00 equiv DBTO, B‐DBTO or M‐DBTO in DCM (2.0 mL, c=0.25 m), 1.50 to 2.00 equiv triflic anhydride (Tf2O), −40 °C to 25 °C. [c] 3.00 equiv methanesulfonic anhydride instead of Tf2O, and reaction performed at 0 °C to 25 °C. [d] 2.00 equiv K2CO3 was added, and reaction performed at −78 °C to 25 °C.

Synthesis and fluorination of aryl sulfonium salts. TTO=thianthrene S‐oxide; DBTO=dibenzothiophene S‐oxide; B‐DBTO=3,7‐di‐tert‐butyldibenzothiophene S‐oxide; M‐DBTO=2,8‐dimethoxydibenzothiophene S‐oxide. Site‐selective aromatic C−H dibenzothiophenylation. [a] Reaction condition A: 0.500 mmol arene, 2.00 to 4.00 equiv triflic acid (HOTf), 3.00 equiv trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) and 1.50 to 2.00 equiv DBTO or B‐DBTO in MeCN (2.0 mL, c=0.25 m), −40 °C to 25 °C. [b] Reaction condition B: 0.500 mmol arene, 1.50 to 2.00 equiv DBTO, B‐DBTO or M‐DBTO in DCM (2.0 mL, c=0.25 m), 1.50 to 2.00 equiv triflic anhydride (Tf2O), −40 °C to 25 °C. [c] 3.00 equiv methanesulfonic anhydride instead of Tf2O, and reaction performed at 0 °C to 25 °C. [d] 2.00 equiv K2CO3 was added, and reaction performed at −78 °C to 25 °C. As depicted in Scheme 1, three differently substituted dibenzothiophene S‐oxides display similar high site‐selectivity under otherwise identical reaction conditions. For unsymmetrical triaryl sulfonium salts, the SNAr reaction occurs preferentially at the most electron‐deficient arene.8, 13 As such, an electron‐rich dibenzothiophen such as M‐DBT should provide high selectivity for the desired arene fluorination. However, M‐DBT is less reactive than more electron‐deficient dibenzothiophenes such as DBT, and cannot be used to efficiently C−H functionalize less electron‐rich arenes. Thus the dibenzothiophene S‐oxide selected for each arene should be electron‐deficient enough to functionalize the arene, and electron‐rich enough to provide high selectivity in fluorination. For example, both DBT and B‐DBT salts of compound 25 could be synthesized in good yields. However, fluorination of the B‐DBT salt affords 94 % yield of desired fluorination product while DBT salt gives only 55 % yield of desired product with 42 % yield of the undesired side‐product (see the Supporting Information). By use of electron‐rich M‐DBT, [18F]fluorination with aryl sulfoniums can now proceed on otherwise challenging electron‐rich complex substrates (36, 38; Table 2).8 Moreover, a range of small‐molecule drugs were successfully 18F‐labeled. Halides (30–32, 34, 35, 37), amides (28), sulfonamides (31), heterocycles (33, 38) were well tolerated. Substrates bearing ortho‐substituents proceeded efficiently to afford the desired 18F‐labeled products (29, 30, 32, 37).
Table 2

Aromatic [18F]fluorination.

[a] Reaction conditions: aryl dibenzothiophenium precursor (9.0 μmol) in 500 μL MeCN at 110 °C for 20 min. RCY=decay‐corrected radiochemical yield. [b] Kryptofix 222 and K2CO3 were added, and reaction performed in 500 μL DMSO.

Aromatic [18F]fluorination. [a] Reaction conditions: aryl dibenzothiophenium precursor (9.0 μmol) in 500 μL MeCN at 110 °C for 20 min. RCY=decay‐corrected radiochemical yield. [b] Kryptofix 222 and K2CO3 were added, and reaction performed in 500 μL DMSO. Elution of the [18F]fluoride from the anion exchange cartridge is commonly achieved with an aqueous solution of a base.14 Aryldibenzothiophenium salts can be used directly for elution of [18F]fluoride, which avoids the addition of bases or kryptofix.7g, 7i, 7l No special care is required to exclude air or moisture at any stage of the radio‐synthesis, and the radiolabeled product can be readily separated from the starting material due to the pronounced polarity difference owing to the cationic sulfonium salt. No carrier‐added [18F]fluorination enabled the automated synthesis of 18F‐labeled compound 32 in high specific activity (1.4 Ci μmol−1). A Hammett analysis of the [19F]fluorination with aryl dimethoxyldibenzothiophenium salts (Hammett‐slope ρ=+3.4) is consistent with a mechanism proceeding via C−F bond reductive elimination from hypervalent sulfurane as previously suggested.8d, 15 In conclusion, we developed a site‐selective late‐stage aromatic [18F]fluorination, enabled by a selective C−H dibenzothiophenylation reaction. We show for the first time how a collection of three electronically different dibenzothiophenes appropriately matched to the electronic requirements of the arene can expand the substrate scope compared to prior art. Beyond the immediate practicality of our method, this new procedure may inspire the development of diverse site‐selective reactions for carbon–heteroatom bond formation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  44 in total

1.  Cu(OTf)2-mediated fluorination of aryltrifluoroborates with potassium fluoride.

Authors:  Yingda Ye; Sydonie D Schimler; Patrick S Hanley; Melanie S Sanford
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Synthesis and imaging validation of [¹⁸F]MDL100907 enabled by Ni-mediated fluorination.

Authors:  Hong Ren; Hsiao-Ying Wey; Martin Strebl; Ramesh Neelamegam; Tobias Ritter; Jacob M Hooker
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 3.  Chemistry for Positron Emission Tomography: Recent Advances in 11 C-, 18 F-, 13 N-, and 15 O-Labeling Reactions.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Deng; Jian Rong; Lu Wang; Neil Vasdev; Lei Zhang; Lee Josephson; Steven H Liang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Development of Fluorine-18 Labeled Metabolically Activated Tracers for Imaging of Drug Efflux Transporters with Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Kerstin Sander; Eva Galante; Thibault Gendron; Elena Yiannaki; Niral Patel; Tammy L Kalber; Adam Badar; Mathew Robson; Sean P Johnson; Florian Bauer; Severin Mairinger; Johann Stanek; Thomas Wanek; Claudia Kuntner; Tim Kottke; Lilia Weizel; David Dickens; Kjell Erlandsson; Brian F Hutton; Mark F Lythgoe; Holger Stark; Oliver Langer; Matthias Koepp; Erik Årstad
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Metal-free C-H thioarylation of arenes using sulfoxides: a direct, general diaryl sulfide synthesis.

Authors:  José A Fernández-Salas; Alexander P Pulis; David J Procter
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Aromatic radiofluorination with [18F]fluorine gas: 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa.

Authors:  G Firnau; R Chirakal; E S Garnett
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Nickel-mediated oxidative fluorination for PET with aqueous [18F] fluoride.

Authors:  Eunsung Lee; Jacob M Hooker; Tobias Ritter
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 8.  Positron emission tomography image-guided drug delivery: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Rubel Chakravarty; Hao Hong; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Synthesis of [18F]Arenes via the Copper-Mediated [18F]Fluorination of Boronic Acids.

Authors:  Andrew V Mossine; Allen F Brooks; Katarina J Makaravage; Jason M Miller; Naoko Ichiishi; Melanie S Sanford; Peter J H Scott
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 6.005

10.  Concerted nucleophilic aromatic substitution with (19)F(-) and (18)F(-).

Authors:  Constanze N Neumann; Jacob M Hooker; Tobias Ritter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  NHC-Copper Mediated Ligand-Directed Radiofluorination of Aryl Halides.

Authors:  Liam S Sharninghausen; Allen F Brooks; Wade P Winton; Katarina J Makaravage; Peter J H Scott; Melanie S Sanford
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Fluorine-18: Radiochemistry and Target-Specific PET Molecular Probes Design.

Authors:  Yunze Wang; Qingyu Lin; Hongcheng Shi; Dengfeng Cheng
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.545

3.  Sequential Ir/Cu-Mediated Method for the Meta-Selective C-H Radiofluorination of (Hetero)Arenes.

Authors:  Jay S Wright; Liam S Sharninghausen; Sean Preshlock; Allen F Brooks; Melanie S Sanford; Peter J H Scott
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Site-Selective Late-Stage Aromatic [18 F]Fluorination via Aryl Sulfonium Salts.

Authors:  Peng Xu; Da Zhao; Florian Berger; Aboubakr Hamad; Jens Rickmeier; Roland Petzold; Mykhailo Kondratiuk; Kostiantyn Bohdan; Tobias Ritter
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Iron(II)/Persulfate Mediated Newman-Kwart Rearrangement.

Authors:  Thibault Gendron; Raul Pereira; Hafsa Y Abdi; Timothy H Witney; Erik Årstad
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.005

6.  Lewis Acid-Facilitated Radiofluorination of MN3PU: A LRRK2 Radiotracer.

Authors:  Noeen Malik; Shreya Bendre; Ralf Schirrmacher; Paul Schaffer
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Synthesis of 6H-Benzo[c]chromene Scaffolds from O-Benzylated Phenols through a C-H Sulfenylation/Radical Cyclization Sequence.

Authors:  Steve Karreman; Simon B H Karnbrock; Sebastian Kolle; Christopher Golz; Manuel Alcarazo
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.005

8.  Regio- and Stereoselective Thianthrenation of Olefins To Access Versatile Alkenyl Electrophiles.

Authors:  Junting Chen; Jiakun Li; Matthew B Plutschack; Florian Berger; Tobias Ritter
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 9.  Closing the gap between 19F and 18F chemistry.

Authors:  Javier Ajenjo; Gianluca Destro; Bart Cornelissen; Véronique Gouverneur
Journal:  EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem       Date:  2021-09-25

10.  Ultrafast Photoclick Reaction for Selective 18F-Positron Emission Tomography Tracer Synthesis in Flow.

Authors:  Youxin Fu; Hugo Helbert; Nadja A Simeth; Stefano Crespi; Gerbren B Spoelstra; Jan Maarten van Dijl; Marleen van Oosten; Luiza Reali Nazario; Dion van der Born; Gert Luurtsema; Wiktor Szymanski; Philip H Elsinga; Ben L Feringa
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.