Thibault Gendron1,2, Raul Pereira3,4, Hafsa Y Abdi2, Timothy H Witney3,4, Erik Årstad1,2. 1. Centre for Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry , University College London , 5 Gower Place , London WC1E 6BS , United Kingdom. 2. Department of Chemistry , University College London , 20 Gordon Street , London WC1H 0AJ , United Kingdom. 3. Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging , University College London , 72 Huntley Street , London WC1E 6DD , United Kingdom. 4. Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences , King's College London , St. Thomas' Hospital , London SE1 7EH , United Kingdom.
Abstract
Herein, we report that iron(II)/ammonium persulfate in aqueous acetonitrile mediates the Newman-Kwart rearrangement of O-aryl carbamothioates. Electron-rich substrates react rapidly under moderate heating to afford the rearranged products in excellent yields. The mild conditions, rapid reaction rates, and suitability for scale up offers immediate practical benefits to access functionalized thiophenols.
Herein, we report that iron(II)/ammonium persulfate in aqueous acetonitrile mediates the Newman-Kwart rearrangement of O-aryl carbamothioates. Electron-rich substrates react rapidly under moderate heating to afford the rearranged products in excellent yields. The mild conditions, rapid reaction rates, and suitability for scale up offers immediate practical benefits to access functionalized thiophenols.
The Newman–Kwart rearrangement
(NKR)—the transformation of O-aryl carbamothioates
to the corresponding S-aryl carbamothioates—gives
access to thiophenols from their more readily available phenol counterparts.[1,2] The three-step sequence, which involves phenol protection with thiocarbamoyl
chloride, NKR, and deprotection of the resulting carbamothioate, is
appealing, as it avoids the need for highly reactive reagents or handling
of foul-smelling chemicals. The NKR is therefore a synthetically important
reaction with widespread applications.[3−6] The high activation barrier (ca. 35–43
kcal·mol–1)[7] of
the reaction has been a long-standing limitation, as thermal activation
requires temperatures of 150 °C for electron-deficient substrates
to >300 °C for nonactivated arenes (Figure ).[7] At such high
temperatures, compound volatility, decomposition, and charring become
problematic. In practice, the thermal reaction is therefore limited
to activated, thermally stable, and nonvolatile substrates. Renewed
interest in the NKR has led to the discovery of several catalytic
systems that favor electron-rich substrates, including a photoredox
catalytic system[8] and, very recently, an
electrochemical method,[9] as well as a chemical
reaction involving single-electron oxidation of O-aryl carbamothioates with ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN) in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO).[10] The latter method makes
the NKR with electron-rich substrates widely accessible, as it overcomes
the need for specialist equipment. However, the use of DMSO as the
solvent, and the need for high substrate dilution, practically limits
applications to small-scale reactions.
Newman–Kwart Rearrangement
(NKR). Abbreviation: APS, ammonium
persulfate; EWG, electron-withdrawing groups; EDG, electron-donating
groups.As a part of our ongoing research program, we needed
a robust scalable
method to access S-(3′,5′-dimethoxy-5-methyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl)
dimethylcarbamothioate 2a from the corresponding O-aryl carbamothioate 1a (Scheme ).[11] Although successful on small scale, the thermal NKR proved operationally
challenging to scale to multigram quantities, as inconsistent heating
resulted in variable yields. Attempted Pd-catalyzed NKR only afforded
trace amounts of product 2a in agreement with the previously
reported scope.[12] Inspired by the work
of Anderson and Kochi on radical decarboxylation of carboxylic acids,[13] we attempted to use silver nitrate and ammonium
persulfate (APS) as a single electron oxidant to mediate this transformation.
Gratifyingly, under these conditions (35 mol % AgNO3, 1
equiv of APS, CH3CN/H2O, 85 °C) 1a rearranged to target product 2a in 78% yield (Scheme ). In a bid to develop a practical and scalable method, we
investigated the effect of the different reagents and reaction parameters
using O-(4-methoxyphenyl) dimethylcarbamothioate 1b as a model compound (Table ). When subjected to the aforementioned conditions, 1b was fully converted to 2b (Table , entry 1). Control experiments
proved that APS is essential for the reaction to proceed (Table , entry 2). In the
absence of silver, we observed large variations in yields depending
on the source of APS. Subsequent analysis by inductively coupled plasma
mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) revealed high levels of iron in the batch
of APS that most effectively mediated transformation of 1b to 2b (see Supporting Information). As iron is known to accelerate the decomposition of APS in a similar
manner to silver,[13,14] we hypothesized that the iron
impurity played a key role in the reaction. Gratifyingly, replacing
silver nitrate with catalytic amounts (5 mol %) of Mohr’s salt
((NH4)2Fe(SO4)2·6H2O) afforded 2b in 95% yield (Table , entry 4). Lowering the reaction
temperature from 85 to 45 °C still gave full conversion within
1 h and afforded 2b in 91% isolated yield (Table , entry 5). As described in
the previously reported non-thermal NKR protocols,[8−10] the reaction
proved less efficient at high concentrations. At a concentration up
to 0.17 M (Table ,
entry 7), the rate of transformation appeared to be unaffected; however,
at 0.25 M the yield dropped to 10% under otherwise identical conditions
(Table , entry 6).
Finally, the use of water as cosolvent proved crucial for the formation
of the target product. Indeed, when acetonitrile was used as the sole
reaction solvent, starting material 1b was converted
quantitatively to the corresponding carbamate 3b (Table , entry 8).
As determined by 1H NMR,
isolated yields are given in brackets.
As silver nitrate.
As Mohr’s salt.
Depending on the source of APS.
Reaction was heated for 4 h, conversion
to 3b.
Preliminary
Results
Conditions: silver
nitrate
(35 mol %), ammonium persulfate (1.3 equiv), CH3CN/H2O 3:1, 85 °C, 90 min, 78% yield.As determined by 1H NMR,
isolated yields are given in brackets.As silver nitrate.As Mohr’s salt.Depending on the source of APS.Reaction was heated for 4 h, conversion
to 3b.With optimized conditions in hand (5 mol % Mohr’s
salt,
1 equiv of APS, CH3CN/H2O 3:1), we explored
the scope of this novel NKR reaction (Figure ). Substrates substituted with electron-donating
groups (EDG) in the para-position afforded rearranged
products 2a–f in nearly quantitative
yields. Additional electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) were well tolerated,
as exemplified with the formation of aldehyde and ester substituted
products 2e and 2f in 95% and 93% yields,
respectively. Steric hindrance had little-to-no influence on the rearrangement,
as ortho-substituted products 2a and 2f–i were obtained in good-to-excellent
yields. The reaction displayed good functional group tolerance, as
aldehyde, ester, allyl, and bromo substituents in products 2e–h remained intact through the procedure; notably,
oxidation of aldehyde 2e was not observed. However, rearrangement
of benzylic alcohol 2n was problematic, as oxidation
of the alcohol resulted in the formation of a complex mixture of products. S-(Naphthalene-1-yl) dimethyl-carbamothioate 2j and its 2-regioisomer 2k were obtained in 85% and 84%
isolated yields, respectively. This result is of note, as the CAN[10] and photoredox[8] methods
allow access to the 1-napthalene but not the 2-napthalene derivative.
Formation of electron-neutral 2l and moderately electron-deficient meta-methoxy substituted 2m was observed, albeit
in moderate conversions (<10% and 17%, respectively). Attempted
reactions with electron-deficient substrates proved troublesome; nitro- 1o, nitrile- 1p, aldehyde- 1q, and
halide- 1r–t substituted O-aryl carbamothioate failed to rearrange. In most cases,
NMR analysis of the reaction mixture showed that the starting materials
were transformed to the corresponding O-aryl carbamates
instead of the expected S-aryl carbamothioate
(see Supporting Information, Figures S5 and S6). Formation of carbamates has
previously been reported for the CAN-DMSO mediated NKR reaction.[10]
Figure 2
Scope study. Conditions: 1 (1 mmol), Mohr’s salt (5 mol
%), APS (1 equiv), CH3CN/H2O
3:1, 65 °C,
2 h; 1 (1 mmol), Mohr’s
salt (5 mol %), APS (1 equiv), CH3CN/H2O 3:1,
45 °C, 1 h. *Scale-up to 10 mmol. **Conversion determined by 1H NMR.
Scope study. Conditions: 1 (1 mmol), Mohr’s salt (5 mol
%), APS (1 equiv), CH3CN/H2O
3:1, 65 °C,
2 h; 1 (1 mmol), Mohr’s
salt (5 mol %), APS (1 equiv), CH3CN/H2O 3:1,
45 °C, 1 h. *Scale-up to 10 mmol. **Conversion determined by 1H NMR.To gain a better understanding of this side reaction,
isotopically
labeled [18O]O-aryl carbamothioate 18O-2o was subjected to the reaction conditions
with strict exclusion of water and oxygen (Scheme A). Carbamate 18O-3j was isolated in 60% yield. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) confirmed
the position of the [18O]oxygen on the molecule as shown
on Scheme A (see Supporting Information). In the absence of any
other source of oxygen, this demonstrates that the extra oxygen added
on the carbamate is likely to come from the persulfate. Furthermore,
subjecting 1b to the standard reaction conditions while
replacing H2O with [18O]H2O did not
lead to any isotopic exchange on the rearranged product, thus suggesting
that water is not actively participating in the reaction (Scheme B). Overall, the
results of this scope study are in line with the work previously published
on oxidative NKR: the reaction proceeded rapidly with electron-rich
ring systems and nonactivated systems reacted more sluggishly, while
electron-deficient substrates failed to react, or underwent a side-reaction
to give the corresponding O-carbamates.
Scheme 2
Isotopic
Labeling Experiments (A, B) and Crossover Experiment (C)
Conditions: (i)
Mohr’s
salt (5 mol %), APS (2 equiv), anhydrous degassed CH3CN,
65 °C, 3 h; (ii) Mohr’s salt (5 mol %), APS (1 equiv),
CH3CN/[18O]H2O 3:1, 45 °C, 1
h; (iii) Mohr’s salt (5 mol %), APS (1 equiv), CH3CN/H2O 3:1, 45 °C, 1 h.
Isotopic
Labeling Experiments (A, B) and Crossover Experiment (C)
Conditions: (i)
Mohr’s
salt (5 mol %), APS (2 equiv), anhydrous degassed CH3CN,
65 °C, 3 h; (ii) Mohr’s salt (5 mol %), APS (1 equiv),
CH3CN/[18O]H2O 3:1, 45 °C, 1
h; (iii) Mohr’s salt (5 mol %), APS (1 equiv), CH3CN/H2O 3:1, 45 °C, 1 h.To
elucidate the rearrangement mechanism itself, we first focused
our attention on the reaction kinetics. 1H NMR reaction
monitoring of the para-methoxy derivative 1b led to a sigmoidal kinetic profile (see Supporting Information, Figure S8). After an
induction period of about 35 min, 1b was quantitatively
rearranged to product 2b within 20 min on a 0.5 mmol
scale (zero-order linear approximation k ≈
5 mmol·L–1·min–1). Although not uncommon, sigmoidal kinetic profiles are difficult
to interpret; unravelling which mechanisms are responsible for the
induction period and then for reaction lift-off is challenging and
outside of the scope of the present study. We subsequently investigated
whether the reaction was inter- or intramolecular through a crossover
experiment between the para-methoxy derivative 1b and its ethyl analogue 1d (Scheme C). Should the reaction be
intermolecular, an interchange of substituents would occur, giving
rise to crossover rearranged products 4b and 4d. NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture showed exclusive formation
of the two noncrossover rearranged products 2b and 2d, in equal amounts. The absence of crossover products confirms
that the reaction proceeds through an intramolecular mechanism.The observed reactivity points to a radical-cation transition state
as reported for other nonthermal NKR.[8−10] Indeed, iron(II)/(III)
salts and oxides are known to decompose aqueous APS to sulfate radical
anions SO4–• in a Fenton-like
process.[15] Consistent with this, a dark
orange-brown residue was observed in the product mixtures. Blocking
of the reaction with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl
(TEMPO), an established radical trap, provided further evidence of
a radical reaction mechanism. On the basis of these observations,
we propose the mechanism depicted in Scheme . A Fenton-like process generates sulfate
radical anion SO4–• (Scheme , blue box), which,
in turn, reacts by abstracting an electron from the sulfur atom in 1b, forming radical cation 1b+•. Subsequent intramolecular (vide supra) rearrangement
of 1b+• leads to the formation of a
putative four-center intermediate I, as previously described.[16] Heterolytic cleavage of the OAryl bond gives radical cation 2b+•, which after single-electron reduction affords product 2b. The exact nature of the reduction step is unclear; 2b+• could potentially abstract an electron from 1b. However, experimental observations suggest that 1b alone cannot sustain a radical chain reaction. It is therefore
more likely that single electron reduction is mediated by the persulfate
system, possibly by combination of the sulfate radical anion SO4–• with 2b+• to give intermediate II. Nucleophilic attack by sulfate
would then liberate the product 2b and regenerate the
peroxide.[17] The high reactivity of the
APS/Fe(II) system may reflect the ability of sulfate to stabilize
single electron transfer through cyclic transition states.[18]
Scheme 3
Proposed Mechanism
Finally, we employed the novel strategy for
the synthesis of 18F-AEM1,[19] a putative radiotracer
for imaging of cancer drug resistance with positron emission tomography
(Scheme ). On a 3
g scale (10 mmol), 1a rearranged to give biaryl building
block 2a in 81% yield. Coupling with the aryl bromide 5 gave the corresponding biaryl thioether 6 in
56% yield, which upon treatment with aqueous calcium hypochlorite[11] afforded the dibenzothiophene sulfonium salt 7 in 72% yield. Labeling with [18F]fluoride (2.5
mg, DMSO, 125 °C, 25 min) under nonoptimized conditions
afforded 18F-AEM1 in 15 ± 4% (n = 4) decay-corrected
radiochemical
yield (d.c. RCY).
Very recently, Ritter and Alcarazo independently
reported late-stage,
site-selective aromatic C–H insertion of aryl dibenzothiophenium
salts.[20,21] Although synthetically more demanding, the
ring-closing route exemplified with 2a above is highly
complementary in that it gives access to complex heteroatom-rich molecules
such as 18F-AEM1 and allows the point of functionalization
to be chosen at will.
Application to the Labeling of 18F-AEM1
Conditions: (i) 2a, tBuOK, Pd2(dba)3, DPEPhos,
toluene, reflux, 56% yield; (ii) Ca(OCl)2, acetate buffer
pH 4, acetonitrile, 3 °C, 15 min, 72% yield; (iii) 18F–, K222/KHCO3, DMSO,
125 °C, 25 min, 15 ± 4% d.c.
RCY (n = 4).In conclusion,
we report that catalytic amounts of Fe(II) in the
presence of APS mediates conversion of electron-rich and electron-neutral O-aryl carbamothioates to the corresponding S-aryl carbamothioates under mild conditions. The reaction has a similar
scope to the previously reported methods for cation-radical mediated
NKR, but offers clear practical advantages in that it circumvents
the need for specialist equipment and proceeds with shorter reaction
times and at higher substrate concentration, and the use of a volatile
solvent makes it well suited for scale up. The practicability of the
APS/Fe(II) system may prove beneficial for radical-driven reactions
beyond the NKR.
Authors: Michael J Bollong; Hwayoung Yun; Lance Sherwood; Ashley K Woods; Luke L Lairson; Peter G Schultz Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Jeremy N Harvey; Jesús Jover; Guy C Lloyd-Jones; Jonathan D Moseley; Paul Murray; Joseph S Renny Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2009 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: David W Porter; Michelle Bradley; Zarin Brown; Riccardo Canova; Steven Charlton; Brian Cox; Peter Hunt; David Kolarik; Sarah Lewis; Des O'Connor; John Reilly; Carsten Spanka; Lauren Tedaldi; Simon J Watson; Roland Wermuth; Neil J Press Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Anne Sørensen; Brian Rasmussen; Shubham Agarwal; Magnus Schau-Magnussen; Theis I Sølling; Michael Pittelkow Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Stephan K Pedersen; Anne Ulfkjær; Madeleine N Newman; Sarangki Yogarasa; Anne U Petersen; Theis I Sølling; Michael Pittelkow Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 4.354
Authors: Kevin Kafuta; André Korzun; Marvin Böhm; Christopher Golz; Manuel Alcarazo Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 15.336