| Literature DB >> 31666962 |
Jiangshuo Su1, Jiafu Jiang1, Fei Zhang1, Ye Liu1, Lian Ding1, Sumei Chen1, Fadi Chen1.
Abstract
Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.) is a leading flower with applied value worldwide. Developing new chrysanthemum cultivars with novel characteristics such as new flower colors and shapes, plant architectures, flowering times, postharvest quality, and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in a time- and cost-efficient manner is the ultimate goal for breeders. Various breeding strategies have been employed to improve the aforementioned traits, ranging from conventional techniques, including crossbreeding and mutation breeding, to a series of molecular breeding methods, including transgenic technology, genome editing, and marker-assisted selection (MAS). In addition, the recent extensive advances in high-throughput technologies, especially genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and microbiomics, which are collectively referred to as omics platforms, have led to the collection of substantial amounts of data. Integration of these omics data with phenotypic information will enable the identification of genes/pathways responsible for important traits. Several attempts have been made to use emerging molecular and omics methods with the aim of accelerating the breeding of chrysanthemum. However, applying the findings of such studies to practical chrysanthemum breeding remains a considerable challenge, primarily due to the high heterozygosity and polyploidy of the species. This review summarizes the recent achievements in conventional and modern molecular breeding methods and emerging omics technologies and discusses their future applications for improving the agronomic and horticultural characteristics of chrysanthemum.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic techniques; Plant breeding; Plant genetics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31666962 PMCID: PMC6804895 DOI: 10.1038/s41438-019-0193-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hortic Res ISSN: 2052-7276 Impact factor: 6.793
Fig. 1The abundant genetic variations of flower color and shape in chrysanthemum.
a, b Single type; c, d double type; e, f windmill type; g, h pine needle type; i, j anemone type; k, l incurve type; m–o pompon type
Recent published genetic analyses in chrysanthemum
| Population | Population size | Marker type | Marker number | Study objective | Methodology | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘Yuhualuoying’ × ‘Aoyunhanxiao’ | 142 | RAPD, ISSR, and AFLP | 336 | Linkage map construction | Map construction |
[ |
| ‘Yuhualuoying’ × ‘Aoyunhanxiao’ | 142 | SRAP | 675 | Inflorescence traits | QTL mapping |
[ |
| ‘Yuhualuoying’ × ‘Aoyunhanxiao’ | 142 | SRAP | 675 | Plant architectural traits | QTL mapping |
[ |
| ‘Yuhualuoying’ × ‘Aoyunhanxiao’ | 142 | SRAP | 675 | Leaf traits | QTL mapping |
[ |
| ‘Yuhualuoying’ × ‘Aoyunhanxiao’ | 142 | SRAP | 346 | Flowering time | One-way ANOVA |
[ |
| ‘Yuhualuoying’ × ‘Aoyunhanxiao’ | 142 | SRAP | 675 | Flowering time | QTL mapping |
[ |
| ‘Han 2’ × ‘Nannong Gongfen’ | 133 | SRAP, SSR, and SCoT | 262 | Aphid resistance | One-way ANOVA, QTL mapping, and BSA |
[ |
| ‘QX145’ × ‘Nannongyinshan’ | 92 | SRAP and SSR | 234 | Branching traits | QTL mapping |
[ |
| ‘QX053’ × ‘Nanong Jingyan’ | 160 | SRAP, SSR, and SCoT | 497 | Inflorescence traits | One-way ANOVA and QTL mapping |
[ |
| ‘Nannong Xuefeng’ × ‘Monalisa’ | 162 | SRAP and SSR | 502 | Waterlogging tolerance | QTL mapping |
[ |
| ‘Kitam’ × ‘Relinda’ | 86/160 | AFLP | 1000/327 | Branching traits | Candidate gene-based association study/one-way ANOVA, and BSA |
[ |
| ‘Puma White’ × ‘Dancer’ | 94 | AFLP | 1779 | White rust | BSA |
[ |
| Natural population | 159 | SRAP, SSR, and SCoT | 707 | Plant architecture and inflorescence | GWAS |
[ |
| Natural population | 100 | SRAP, SSR, and SCoT | 707 | Waterlogging tolerance | GWAS |
[ |
| Natural population | 80 | SRAP, SSR, and SCoT | 707 | Aphid resistance | GWAS |
[ |
| Natural population | 159 | SRAP, SSR, and SCoT | 707 | Drought tolerance | GWAS |
[ |
| DB36451×DB39287 | 406 | SNP | 183,000 | Flowering time and inflorescence traits | QTL mapping |
[ |
| Natural population | 199 | SNP | 92,830 | Cultivated type and inflorescence traits | GWAS |
[ |
| Natural population | 88 | SNP | 92,811 | Waterlogging tolerance | GWAS |
[ |
| Natural population | 107 | SNP | 92,617 | Inflorescence traits | GWAS |
[ |
Recent published transcriptomic studies in chrysanthemum
| Category | Material | Plant organ/developmental stage | Study objective | Methodology | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant growth and development |
| Leaves in seedling and visible bud stage | Flowering | RNA-seq |
[ |
| ‘Fenditan’ | Vegetative buds, floral buds, and buds | Flower development | RNA-seq |
[ | |
| ‘Jinba’ | Whorl petals at four developmental stages | Petal growth | RNA-seq |
[ | |
| Stress resistance | ‘Fall Color’ | Leaves and roots | Drought stress | RNA-seq |
[ |
| ‘Jinba’ | Leaves and roots | Salt stress | RNA-seq |
[ | |
| ‘Jinba’ | Seedlings | Cold stress | RNA-seq |
[ | |
|
| Leaf | Heat stress | RNA-seq |
[ | |
| ‘Nannongxuefeng’, ‘Qinglu' | Roots | Waterlogging stress | RNA-seq |
[ | |
| ‘Nannongxunzhang’ | Leaf | Aphid stress | miRNAs |
[ | |
| ‘Zaoyihong’ | Leaf | Disease | RNA-seq |
[ | |
| ‘Shinm’ | Leaf | RNA viruses | Microarray |
[ | |
| ‘C029’, ‘C008’ | Leaf | White rust | RNA-seq |
[ | |
| Secondary metabolism | ‘Purple Reagan’ | Ray florets at five developmental stages | Anthocyanin biosynthesis | RNA-seq |
[ |
| ‘Feeling White’, ‘Feeling Green’, and ‘Feeling Green Dark’ | Ray florets | Chlorophyll metabolism in petal | Microarray |
[ | |
| ‘Chuju’ | Flowers at four developmental stages | Flavonoid biosynthesis | RNA-seq |
[ |
Fig. 2A hypothetical comprehensive breeding scheme for chrysanthemum integrating conventional with modern breeding strategies