| Literature DB >> 22451173 |
Caroline Evans1, Josselin Noirel, Saw Yen Ow, Malinda Salim, Ana G Pereira-Medrano, Narciso Couto, Jagroop Pandhal, Duncan Smith, Trong Khoa Pham, Esther Karunakaran, Xin Zou, Catherine A Biggs, Phillip C Wright.
Abstract
The iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification) technique is widely employed in proteomic workflows requiring relative quantification. Here, we review the iTRAQ literature; in particular, we focus on iTRAQ usage in relation to other commonly used quantitative techniques e.g. stable isotope labelling in culture (SILAC), label-free methods and selected reaction monitoring (SRM). As a result, we identify several issues arising with respect to iTRAQ. Perhaps frustratingly, iTRAQ's attractiveness has been undermined by a number of technical and analytical limitations: it may not be truly quantitative, as the changes in abundance reported will generally be underestimated. We discuss weaknesses and strengths of iTRAQ as a methodology for relative quantification in the light of this and other technical issues. We focus on technical developments targeted at iTRAQ accuracy and precision, use of 4-plex over 8-plex reagents and application of iTRAQ to post-translational modification (PTM) workflows. We also discuss iTRAQ in relation to label-free approaches, to which iTRAQ is losing ground.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22451173 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-5918-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem ISSN: 1618-2642 Impact factor: 4.142