Literature DB >> 31664518

Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Tian Han1,2,3, Feng Zhao1,2,3,4, Xun Chen1,2,3, Huamao Miao1,2,3, Zhuoyi Chen1,2,3, Xingtao Zhou5,6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate changes in objective disk halo size produced by a glare source after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia correction.
METHODS: This prospective clinical study included 45 right eyes of 45 patients with a mean age of 25.40 ± 5.06 years and mean spherical equivalent (SE) of - 6.08 ± 1.90 diopters. Disk halo size was measured with a vision monitor before surgery and at postoperative 1 week and 3 months. Other information was collected, including age, SE, lenticule thickness, lenticule diameter, dark pupil, and pupillary response to light parameters (initial diameter; amplitude, latency, duration, and velocity of contraction; latency, duration, and velocity of dilation; and maximum, minimum, and average pupil size).
RESULTS: Compared to preoperative values, disk halo size increased significantly at postoperative 1 week (P = 0.026) and returned to baseline at postoperative 3 months (P = 0.349). Preoperative disk halo size significantly correlated with SE (r = - 0.346, P = 0.020), minimum pupil size (r = 0.365, P = 0.014), and average pupil size (r = 0.310, P = 0.038). Disk halo size at postoperative 1 week was significantly correlated with age (r = 0.324, P = 0.030) and minimum pupil size (r = 0.297, P = 0.047). Disk halo size at postoperative 3 months was significantly correlated with lenticule diameter (r = - 0.362, P = 0.015), initial diameter (r = 0.311, P = 0.037), maximum pupil size (r = 0.312, P = 0.037), minimum pupil size (r = 0.440, P = 0.002), and average pupil size (r = 0.373, P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: After SMILE, disk halo size demonstrated a temporary increase and then returned to baseline.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disk halo size; Glare; Pupillary light response; Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31664518     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04481-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  26 in total

1.  Small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia: results of a 12-month prospective study.

Authors:  Yesheng Xu; Yabo Yang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Five-year results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx SMILE).

Authors:  Marcus Blum; Kathrin Täubig; Christin Gruhn; Walter Sekundo; Kathleen S Kunert
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  Rupal Shah; Samir Shah; Sayantan Sengupta
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Normal values for the size of a halo produced by a glare source.

Authors:  María C Puell; María J Pérez-Carrasco; Ana Barrio; Beatriz Antona; Catalina Palomo-Alvarez
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  The role of the mesopic pupil on patient-reported outcomes in young patients with myopia 1 month after wavefront-guided LASIK.

Authors:  Steven Schallhorn; Mitch Brown; Jan Venter; Keith Hettinger; Stephen Hannan
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Pharmacological management of night vision disturbances after refractive surgery Results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alessandro Randazzo; Francesco Nizzola; Luca Rossetti; Nicola Orzalesi; Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Night vision disturbances after successful LASIK surgery.

Authors:  César Villa; Ramón Gutiérrez; José Ramón Jiménez; José Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Relationship between halo size and forward light scatter.

Authors:  María C Puell; María J Pérez-Carrasco; Catalina Palomo-Alvarez; Beatriz Antona; Ana Barrio
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Evaluation of pupillary response to light in patients with glaucoma: a study using computerized pupillometry.

Authors:  Alessio Martucci; Massimo Cesareo; Domenico Napoli; Roberto Pietro Sorge; Federico Ricci; Raffaele Mancino; Carlo Nucci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Melissa D Bailey; G Lynn Mitchell; Deepinder K Dhaliwal; Brian S Boxer Wachler; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Comprehensive Investigation of Contrast Sensitivity and Disk Halo in High Myopia Treated With SMILE and EVO Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Wuxiao Zhao; Jing Zhao; Tian Han; Jifang Wang; Zhe Zhang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.048

2.  Twelve-year global publications on small incision lenticule extraction: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Tian Han; Liang Zhao; Yang Shen; Zhi Chen; Dong Yang; Jiaoyan Zhang; Walter Sekundo; Rupal Shah; Jinhui Tian; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-08

3.  Quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) results three years after SMILE and FS-LASIK.

Authors:  Tian Han; Ye Xu; Xiao Han; Jianmin Shang; Li Zeng; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.186

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.