Literature DB >> 12867394

Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Melissa D Bailey1, G Lynn Mitchell, Deepinder K Dhaliwal, Brian S Boxer Wachler, Karla Zadnik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine preoperative risk factors for decreased satisfaction and symptoms of glare, halos, and/or starbursts after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
DESIGN: Retrospective, case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 604 previously myopic patients who underwent LASIK at least six months prior to completing the questionnaire.
METHODS: Questionnaires about satisfaction and night vision symptoms were mailed to 2100 patients from the Northeastern Eye Institute, UCLA, and the University of Pittsburgh. Preoperative and postoperative ocular variables were collected from the medical charts of the 841 subjects who returned the questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to various satisfaction and night vision symptom questions were compared to demographic and preoperative ocular variables using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: The questionnaire return rate was 42.9%. The mean age for all subjects was 43.0 +/- 10.6 years, and 63% of the subjects were women. Overall, 97% of the subjects would recommend LASIK to a friend. Among subjects who would not recommend LASIK to a friend, a significantly larger percentage reported that they experienced glare, halos, or starbursts (13 of 16 (81.3%) vs. 206 of 388 (53.1%), chi(2) = 4.9, p = 0.03). Also, subjects with flatter preoperative minimum corneal curvature values were more likely to report that they would not recommend LASIK to a friend (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.52, 0.96), p = 0.03). The median score for satisfaction with vision was 100%, or the maximum value of 127 mm on the visual analog scale. Increasing age was significantly associated with dissatisfaction with vision after LASIK (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = (1.10, 2.56), P = 0.02). Halos were reported by 30%, glare by 27%, and starbursts by 25% of all subjects. Subjects who reported starbursts had a significantly flatter preoperative minimum corneal curvature (43.54 +/- 1.60 D versus 43.92 +/- 1.69 D, t = 2.15, p = 0.03). Also, subjects who had surgical enhancement were more likely to experience glare, halos, and/or starbursts (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = (1.33, 3.46), p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects are satisfied with their vision after LASIK. Our study suggests, however, that certain factors are associated with decreased satisfaction and night vision symptoms after LASIK. Some of these factors include: increasing age, flatter preoperative minimum corneal curvature, and surgical enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12867394     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00455-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  28 in total

1.  [Wavefront aberrations and subjective quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK: first results].

Authors:  J Bühren; A Strenger; T Martin; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Optical quality after refractive corneal surgery].

Authors:  T Kohnen; J Bühren; M Cichocki; T Kasper; E Terzi; C Ohrloff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Visual and non-visual factors associated with patient satisfaction and quality of life in LASIK.

Authors:  P Lazon de la Jara; D Erickson; P Erickson; F Stapleton
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  A survey of satisfaction in anophthalmic patients wearing ocular prosthesis.

Authors:  Jong-Suk Song; Jaeryung Oh; Se Hyun Baek
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Tian Han; Feng Zhao; Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Zhuoyi Chen; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Laser in situ keratomileusis application for myopia over minus 14 diopter with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Faik Oruçoğlu; James D Kingham; Mahir Kendüşim; Buket Ayoğlu; Berrin Toksu; Sinan Göker
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Comparison of ReLEx SMILE and PRK in terms of visual and refractive outcomes for the correction of low myopia.

Authors:  Sri Ganesh; Sheetal Brar; Utsav Patel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Higher-order aberrations after wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Claudia E Perez-Straziota; Michelle H Hu; Alfred J White; Evan S Loft; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Reasons for not performing keratorefractive surgery in patients seeking refractive surgery in a hospital-based cohort in "yemen".

Authors:  Mahfouth A Bamashmus; Mahmoud F Saleh; Mohamed A Awadalla
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10

Review 10.  Chronic Lung Disease in Primary Antibody Deficiency: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Paul J Maglione
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.