Literature DB >> 24763720

The role of the mesopic pupil on patient-reported outcomes in young patients with myopia 1 month after wavefront-guided LASIK.

Steven Schallhorn, Mitch Brown, Jan Venter, Keith Hettinger, Stephen Hannan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between low-light pupil size and patient-reported outcomes 1 month after wavefront-guided LASIK in young patients with myopia.
METHODS: Retrospective case series of 10,944 eyes of 5,563 young patients with myopia who underwent wavefront-guided LASIK (6.0-mm optical zone). Preoperative pupil size was measured under low-light conditions with an infrared pupillometer. Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated at 1 month postoperatively. A questionnaire was administered to assess patient-reported outcomes including satisfaction with the procedure, night driving, and glare and halo visual symptoms.
RESULTS: The average patient age was 29.8 years (range: 18 to 40 years). The mean preoperative manifest spherical equivalent of -3.49 diopters (D) (range: -0.50 to -11.75 D) was reduced to -0.04 ± 0.29 D at 1 month, with 94% of eyes achieving an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. The mean low-light pupil diameter was 6.6 mm (range: 4 to 9 mm) and 1,514 patients (27.2%) had a diameter of 8 mm or larger. No correlation between pupil diameter and patient-reported outcomes was found (r range: -0.02 to 0.07). Logistic regression analysis identified postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity and postoperative manifest refraction as significant predictors of night halo complaints after wavefront-guided LASIK (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: In this large series of young patients with myopia treated with wavefront-guided LASIK, low-light pupil diameter was not predictive of surgery satisfaction, ability to perform activities, or visual symptoms at 1 month postoperatively. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24763720     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140217-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

1.  Cap morphology after small-incision lenticule extraction and its effects on intraocular scattering.

Authors:  Dan Fu; Lin Wang; Xing-Tao Zhou; Zhi-Qiang Yu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Tian Han; Feng Zhao; Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Zhuoyi Chen; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Errors in Treatment of Lower-order Aberrations and Induction of Higher-order Aberrations in Laser Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Brad E Kligman; Brandon J Baartman; William J Dupps
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2016

4.  The Effect of Age, Postoperative Refraction, and Pre- and Postoperative Pupil Size on Halo Size and Intensity in Eyes Implanted with a Trifocal or Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens.

Authors:  Takeshi Teshigawara; Akira Meguro; Nobuhisa Mizuki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-14

5.  A Comprehensive Investigation of Contrast Sensitivity and Disk Halo in High Myopia Treated With SMILE and EVO Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Wuxiao Zhao; Jing Zhao; Tian Han; Jifang Wang; Zhe Zhang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  Minimum pupil in pupillary response to light and myopia affect disk halo size: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Tian Han; Xun Chen; Zhi Chen; Ke Zheng; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.