Literature DB >> 24016347

Normal values for the size of a halo produced by a glare source.

María C Puell1, María J Pérez-Carrasco, Ana Barrio, Beatriz Antona, Catalina Palomo-Alvarez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the size of a halo in the visual field induced by bright light in healthy eyes of all ages using the Vision Monitor (MonCv3; Metrovision, Pérenchies, France) and to assess the repeatability of the method.
METHODS: Measurements were made in the right eyes of 147 healthy subjects (mean age: 48.2 ± 16.2 years) who were classified into six age groups. Using the Vision Monitor, optotypes of low luminance were presented at a distance of 2.5 m. The visual angle subtended by the radius of the halo was calculated in minutes of arc (arc min). The repeatability of the method was determined in a subset of 37 subjects older than 50 years by calculating the Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability.
RESULTS: The mean radius of the halo was 111.6 ± 39.8 arc min. Halo radius started to increase significantly from the age of 50 to 59 years. The relationship between halo radius and age (r = 0.65; P < .0001) was described by fitting a power function to the data. Halo size was independent of gender. The coefficient of repeatability of the method was ±44 arc min.
CONCLUSIONS: Halo size increases with age following a power model. The normal halo size values provided could help clinicians distinguish between normal or abnormal glare problems. The intersession repeatability observed for halo size measurement indicates this method could be useful for assessing visual impairment caused by glare. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24016347     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130819-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Tian Han; Feng Zhao; Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Zhuoyi Chen; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Corneal Aberrations, Contrast Sensitivity, and Light Distortion in Orthokeratology Patients: 1-Year Results.

Authors:  Elena Santolaria-Sanz; Alejandro Cerviño; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction.

Authors:  Santiago Escandón-García; Filomena J Ribeiro; Colm McAlinden; António Queirós; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 4.  From Presbyopia to Cataracts: A Critical Review on Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome.

Authors:  Joaquín Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Ana Tauste; David P Piñero
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Evaluation of Disk Halo Size after Implantation of a Collamer Lens with a Central Hole (ICL V4c).

Authors:  Xun Chen; Tian Han; Feng Zhao; Huamao Miao; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Two-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy with WaveLight EX500 Platform for Adolescents and Adults with Low to Moderate Myopia: A 12-Month Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  Chulaluck Tangmonkongvoragul; Sumet Supalaset; Napaporn Tananuvat; Somsanguan Ausayakhun
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-13

7.  Evaluation of Disk Halo Size and Identification of Correlated Factors in Myopic Adults.

Authors:  Wuxiao Zhao; Jing Zhao; Tian Han; Meng Li; Jifang Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-28

8.  A Comprehensive Investigation of Contrast Sensitivity and Disk Halo in High Myopia Treated With SMILE and EVO Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Wuxiao Zhao; Jing Zhao; Tian Han; Jifang Wang; Zhe Zhang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.048

9.  Minimum pupil in pupillary response to light and myopia affect disk halo size: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Tian Han; Xun Chen; Zhi Chen; Ke Zheng; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Relationships Between Haloes and Objective Visual Quality in Healthy Eyes.

Authors:  Lu Yao; Ye Xu; Tian Han; Linsong Qi; Jiumei Shi; Zhikang Zou; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.