Literature DB >> 17314153

Night vision disturbances after successful LASIK surgery.

César Villa1, Ramón Gutiérrez, José Ramón Jiménez, José Manuel González-Méijome.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in correlations of higher order aberrations of the first corneal surface with halo phenomena, a form of image degradation, under night vision conditions measured objectively after successful LASIK (laser in situ keratomileusis) surgery.
METHODS: A prospective, observational, analytical study of 110 eyes that had undergone successful LASIK surgery for myopia and astigmatism. Preoperative sphere was (mean (SD)) -3.48 (1.70) D (0 to -8.00 D) and preoperative cylinder was -0.86 (0.87) D (0 to -4.00 D). Visual disturbance caused by halo phenomena was measured with the Starlights v1.0, and pupil size was measured with Colvard pupilometry after adaptation to a dark environment (0.17 lux). Corneal aberrations were computed for a corneal diameter representative of the eye's entrance pupil under night vision conditions.
RESULTS: The halo disturbance index increased in this study by a factor of 2.15 after successful LASIK surgery. Total root mean square for monochromatic higher order aberration displayed a significant correlation with halo disturbance index (r = 0.42; p<0.01). However, only secondary astigmatism (r = 0.36; p<0.01), coma (r = 0.25; p = 0.02) and spherical aberration (r = 0.40; p<0.01) were responsible for such behaviour, with the remaining corneal aberrations up to the sixth order not displaying any significant correlation when considered individually.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing LASIK procedures display an increase of halo phenomena around lights in night vision conditions, even when the results of the surgery are considered entirely satisfactory according to current international standards of predictability, efficacy and safety. Secondary astigmatism, coma and spherical aberration are the higher order aberrations up to the sixth order that significantly correlated with halo disturbance index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17314153      PMCID: PMC1954826          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.110874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  25 in total

1.  Abnormal activation in the visual cortex after corneal refractive surgery for myopia: demonstration by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F J Malecaze; K A Boulanouar; J F Demonet; J L Guell; M A Imbert
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Analysis of customized corneal ablations: theoretical limitations of increasing negative asphericity.

Authors:  Damien Gatinel; Jacques Malet; Thanh Hoang-Xuan; Dimitri T Azar
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Effect of preoperative pupil measurements on glare, halos, and visual function after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy.

Authors:  W W Haw; E E Manche
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis: influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function.

Authors:  Yuan-Chieh Lee; Fung-Rong Hu; I-Jong Wang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Changes in corneal asphericity after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Rosario G Anera; Jose R Jiménez; Luis Jiménez del Barco; Javier Bermúdez; Enrique Hita
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Effect of larger ablation zone and transition zone on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  M J Endl; C E Martinez; S D Klyce; M B McDonald; S J Coorpender; R A Applegate; H C Howland
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-08

7.  Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients.

Authors:  I Brunette; J Gresset; J F Boivin; M Pop; P Thompson; G P Lafond; H Makni
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Nancy I Fan-Paul; Joan Li; Julia Sullivan Miller; George J Florakis
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Equation for corneal asphericity after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  José R Jiménez; Rosario G Anera; Luis Jiménez del Barco
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Binocular visual performance after LASIK.

Authors:  José Ramón Jiménez; Cesar Villa; Rosario González Anera; Ramón Gutiérrez; Luis Jiménez del Barco
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  25 in total

1.  A qualitative investigation of visual tasks with which to assess distance-specific visual function.

Authors:  Mark J Atkinson; Steven Tally; Chris W Heichel; Igor Kozak; Jennifer Leich; Ashley Levack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Night vision disturbances after refractive surgery: haloes are not just for angels.

Authors:  Stephen D Klyce
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  [Aspheric profiles for refractive laser ablation of the cornea].

Authors:  Th Neuhann; I M Neuhann; J M Hassel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Impact of pupil transmission apodization on presbyopic through-focus visual performance with spherical aberration.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; HaeWon Jung; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Retinal straylight and light distortion phenomena in normal and post-LASIK eyes.

Authors:  Alejandro Cerviño; Cesar Villa-Collar; Jose Manuel Gonzalez-Meijome; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Santiago García-Lázaro
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Night-vision tests for evaluating visual performance.

Authors:  José R Jiménez; Rosario G Anera; Cesar Villa; Margarita Soler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Corneal white-to-white distance and mesopic pupil diameter.

Authors:  Hasan Basri Cakmak; Nurullah Cagil; Huseyin Simavli; Sabri Raza
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Tian Han; Feng Zhao; Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Zhuoyi Chen; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Ocular higher-order aberrations and mesopic pupil size in individuals screened for refractive surgery.

Authors:  Seyed Javad Hashemian; Mohammad Soleimani; Alireza Foroutan; Mahmood Joshaghani; Mohammad Jafar Ghaempanah; Mohammad Ebrahim Jafari; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Importance of fixation, pupil center, and reference axis in ocular wavefront sensing, videokeratography, and retinal image quality.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Larry N Thibos; Michael D Twa; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.