Literature DB >> 31656746

The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.

Peter Kronenberg1, Olivier Traxer2.   

Abstract

The Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser has been the gold-standard for laser lithotripsy over the last 20 years. However, recent reports about a new prototype thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripter have revealed impressive levels of performance. We therefore decided to systematically review the reality and expectations for this new TFL technology. This review was registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42019128695). A PubMed search was performed for papers including specific terms relevant to this systematic review published between the years 2015 and 2019, including already accepted but not yet published papers. Additionally, the medical sections of ScienceDirect, Wiley, SpringerLink, Mary Ann Liebert publishers, and Google Scholar were also searched for peer-reviewed abstract presentations. All relevant studies and data identified in the bibliographic search were selected, categorized, and summarized. The authors adhered to PRISMA guidelines for this review. The TFL emits laser radiation at a wavelength of 1,940 nm, and has an optical penetration depth in water about four-times shorter than the Ho:YAG laser. This results in four-times lower stone ablation thresholds, as well as lower tissue ablation thresholds. As the TFL uses electronically-modulated laser diodes, it offers the most comprehensive and flexible range of laser parameters among laser lithotripters, with pulse frequencies up to 2,200 Hz, very low to very high pulse energies (0.005-6 J), short to very long-pulse durations (200 µs up to 12 ms), and a total power level up to 55 W. The stone ablation efficiency is up to four-times that of the Ho:YAG laser for similar laser parameters, with associated implications for speed and operating time. When using dusting settings, the TFL outperforms the Ho:YAG laser in dust quantity and quality, producing much finer particles. Retropulsion is also significantly reduced and sometimes even absent with the TFL. The TFL can use small laser fibers (as small as 50 µm core), with resulting advantages in irrigation, scope deflection, retropulsion reduction, and (in)direct effects on accessibility, visibility, efficiency, and surgical time, as well as offering future miniaturization possibilities. Similar to the Ho:YAG laser, the TFL can also be used for soft tissue applications such as prostate enucleation (ThuFLEP). The TFL machine itself is seven times smaller and eight times lighter than a high-power Ho:YAG laser system, and consumes nine times less energy. Maintenance is expected to be very low due to the durability of its components. The safety profile is also better in many aspects, i.e., for patients, instruments, and surgeons. The advantages of the TFL over the Ho:YAG laser are simply too extensive to be ignored. The TFL appears to be a real alternative to the Ho:YAG laser and become a true game-changer in laser lithotripsy. Due to its novelty, further studies are needed to broaden our understanding of the TFL, and comprehend the full implications and benefits of this new technology, as well its limitations. 2019 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inventions; laser; lithotripsy; systematic review; thulium; urinary calculi

Year:  2019        PMID: 31656746      PMCID: PMC6790412          DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


  96 in total

Review 1.  Diode-pumped fiber lasers: a new clinical tool?

Authors:  Stuart D Jackson; Antonio Lauto
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 2.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy: which modality is best?

Authors:  Raymond J Leveillee; Leonid Lobik
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: optimal power settings.

Authors:  S S Spore; J M Teichman; N S Corbin; P C Champion; E A Williamson; R D Glickman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects.

Authors:  Richard L Blackmon; Pierce B Irby; Nathaniel M Fried
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  The truth about laser fiber diameters.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM OF 34TH WORLD CONGRESS OF ENDOUROLOGY & SWL PROGRAM BOOK AND ABSTRACTS.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Influence of saline on temperature profile of laser lithotripsy activation.

Authors:  Wilson R Molina; Igor N Silva; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Diedra Gustafson; David Sehrt; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  [Physical methods in the treatment of patients with kidney and ureteral calculi].

Authors:  A A Li
Journal:  Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

9.  Miniature ureteroscope distal tip designs for potential use in thulium fiber laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Christopher Wilson; Joshua D Kennedy; Pierce Irby; Nathaniel Fried
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Evaluation of noise hazard during the holmium laser enucleation of prostate.

Authors:  Huan Xu; Yan-Bo Chen; Meng Gu; Qi Chen; Zhong Wang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Thulium fiber laser: The new kid on the block.

Authors:  Matthew Schembri; Jayanta Sahu; Omar Aboumarzouk; Amelia Pietropaolo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27

2.  The impact of the laser fiber-tissue distance on histological parameters in a porcine kidney model.

Authors:  Mark Taratkin; Christopher Netsch; Dmitry Enikeev; Andreas J Gross; Thomas R W Herrmann; Dmitry Korolev; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Petr Glybochko; Benedikt Becker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types?

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Steeve Doizi; Michel Daudon; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jenni Lane; Lily Whitehurst; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Theodoros Tokas; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Pediatric Stone Surgery: What Is Hot and What Is Not.

Authors:  Kenneth A Softness; Michael P Kurtz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Thulium fiber laser pre-settings during ureterorenoscopy: Twitter's experts' recommendations.

Authors:  Alba Sierra; Mariela Corrales; Adrià Piñero; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser.

Authors:  Dmitry Korolev; Gagik Akopyan; Dmitry Tsarichenko; Anastasia Shpikina; Stanislav Ali; Denis Chinenov; Mariela Corrales; Mark Taratkin; Olivier Traxer; Dmitry Enikeev
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG).

Authors:  Wilson R Molina; Raphael V Carrera; Ben H Chew; Bodo E Knudsen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Low-energy high-frequency Ho-YAG lithotripsy: is RIRS going forward? A case-control study.

Authors:  D Peretti; E Dalmasso; A Pecoraro; C Ambruosi; F Venzano; C Fiori; F Porpiglia; O Maugeri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Tips and Tricks to Improve Ergonomics, Efficacy, Versatility, and Overcome Limitations of Micro Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Sarvajit Biligere; Chin-Tiong Heng; Cecilia Cracco; Reshma Mangat; Chloe Shu-Hui Ong; Karthik Thandapani; Takaaki Inoue; Kemal Sarica; Ravindra B Sabnis; Mahesh Desai; Cesare Scoffone; Vineet Gauhar
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.