Matthew Schembri1, Jayanta Sahu2, Omar Aboumarzouk3, Amelia Pietropaolo1, Bhaskar K Somani1. 1. University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. 2. Zepler Institute for Photonics and Nanoelectrics, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 3. Department of Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Laser technology in urology is currently used for both stone lithotripsy and prostate enucleation. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is a novel laser, with initial studies showing potential benefits over other lasers both in terms of its effectiveness and safety profile. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the first part of this review, a descriptive analysis of the theoretical concepts behind TFL was performed. This part focused on the physics and laser parameters as applied to the clinical practice. These were interpreted in the context of other lasers, namely, the Holmium:YAG laser to highlight the theoretical advantages as well as potential pitfalls offered by the TFL. In the second part of the review, a narrative synthesis of in-vitro studies regarding TFL and its modifications is performed assessing stone-related parameters, namely, ablation rate, operative time retropulsion, and safety. RESULTS: TFL achieved high ablation rates in most studies and performed better than Holmium:YAG laser across a range of different settings and ablation modes when the two lasers were compared. Moreover, its ability to use low pulse energy ensures minimal stone retropulsion with the retropulsion threshold estimated to be 2-4 times higher than that of Holmium:YAG laser. From a safety viewpoint, TFL poses no additional risks than other lasers, although it does potentially lead to slightly higher temperatures in the surrounding tissues during lithotripsy. CONCLUSION: The unique properties of TFL have made it an attractive alternative to conventional laser techniques currently used in urology. Clinical studies are required before its application can become more widespread.
OBJECTIVE: Laser technology in urology is currently used for both stone lithotripsy and prostate enucleation. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is a novel laser, with initial studies showing potential benefits over other lasers both in terms of its effectiveness and safety profile. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the first part of this review, a descriptive analysis of the theoretical concepts behind TFL was performed. This part focused on the physics and laser parameters as applied to the clinical practice. These were interpreted in the context of other lasers, namely, the Holmium:YAG laser to highlight the theoretical advantages as well as potential pitfalls offered by the TFL. In the second part of the review, a narrative synthesis of in-vitro studies regarding TFL and its modifications is performed assessing stone-related parameters, namely, ablation rate, operative time retropulsion, and safety. RESULTS:TFL achieved high ablation rates in most studies and performed better than Holmium:YAG laser across a range of different settings and ablation modes when the two lasers were compared. Moreover, its ability to use low pulse energy ensures minimal stone retropulsion with the retropulsion threshold estimated to be 2-4 times higher than that of Holmium:YAG laser. From a safety viewpoint, TFL poses no additional risks than other lasers, although it does potentially lead to slightly higher temperatures in the surrounding tissues during lithotripsy. CONCLUSION: The unique properties of TFL have made it an attractive alternative to conventional laser techniques currently used in urology. Clinical studies are required before its application can become more widespread.
Authors: Christopher R Wilson; Thomas C Hutchens; Luke A Hardy; Pierce B Irby; Nathaniel M Fried Journal: J Endourol Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Christian Kneis; Brenda Donelan; Antoine Berrou; Inka Manek-Hönninger; Thierry Robin; Benoît Cadier; Marc Eichhorn; Christelle Kieleck Journal: Opt Lett Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 3.776
Authors: Davide Perri; Lorenzo Berti; Andrea Pacchetti; Elena Morini; Matteo Maltagliati; Umberto Besana; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Javier Romero-Otero; Giovanni Saredi; Danilo Centrella; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Bernardo Rocco; Salvatore Micali; Paolo Broggini; Marco Boldini; Federica Mazzoleni; Giorgio Bozzini Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-08-27 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Jeremy Ng Chieng Hin; Dinul Hettiarachchilage; Paul Gravestock; Bhavan Rai; Bhaskar K Somani; Rajan Veeratterapillay Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 3.092