Literature DB >> 21806249

Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects.

Richard L Blackmon1, Pierce B Irby, Nathaniel M Fried.   

Abstract

The holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser lithotriptor is capable of operating at high pulse energies, but efficient operation is limited to low pulse rates (∼10 Hz) during lithotripsy. On the contrary, the thulium fiber laser (TFL) is limited to low pulse energies, but can operate efficiently at high pulse rates (up to 1000 Hz). This study compares stone ablation threshold, ablation rate, and retropulsion for the two different Ho:YAG and TFL operation modes. The TFL (λ = 1908 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 5 to 35 mJ, 500-μs pulse duration, and pulse rates of 10 to 400 Hz. The Ho:YAG laser (λ = 2120 nm) was operated with pulse energies of 30 to 550 mJ, 350-μs pulse duration, and a pulse rate of 10 Hz. Laser energy was delivered through 200- and 270-μm-core optical fibers in contact mode with human calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones for ablation studies and plaster-of-Paris stone phantoms for retropulsion studies. The COM stone ablation threshold for Ho:YAG and TFL measured 82.6 and 20.8 J∕cm(2), respectively. Stone retropulsion with the Ho:YAG laser linearly increased with pulse energy. Retropulsion with TFL was minimal at pulse rates less than 150 Hz, then rapidly increased at higher pulse rates. For minimal stone retropulsion, Ho:YAG operation at pulse energies less than 175 mJ at 10 Hz and TFL operation at 35 mJ at 100 Hz is recommended, with both lasers producing comparable ablation rates. Further development of a TFL operating with both high pulse energies of 100 to 200 mJ and high pulse rates of 100 to 150 Hz may also provide an alternative to the Ho:YAG laser for higher ablation rates, when retropulsion is not a primary concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21806249     DOI: 10.1117/1.3564884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  12 in total

1.  Calculus migration characterization during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy by high-speed camera using suspended pendulum method.

Authors:  Jian James Zhang; Danop Rajabhandharaks; Jason Rongwei Xuan; Ray W J Chia; Thomas Hasenberg
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Thulium fiber laser: The new kid on the block.

Authors:  Matthew Schembri; Jayanta Sahu; Omar Aboumarzouk; Amelia Pietropaolo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27

Review 3.  Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Moses technology in a stone simulator.

Authors:  Ahmed Ibrahim; Shadi Badaan; Mostafa M Elhilali; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

6.  Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: aspects of intracorporeal lithotripsy in flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Søren Kissow Lildal; Kim Hovgaard Andreassen; Joyce Baard; Marianne Brehmer; Matthew Bultitude; Ylva Eriksson; Khurshid R Ghani; Helene Jung; Guido Kamphuis; Peter Kronenberg; Ben Turney; Olivier Traxer; Øyvind Ulvik; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Etienne Xavier Keller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  How to perform the dusting technique for calcium oxalate stone phantoms during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jeong Woo Lee; Min Gu Park; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Thulium fiber laser utilization in urological surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Johnathan A Khusid; Raymond Khargi; Benjamin Seiden; Areeba S Sadiq; William M Atallah; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of Thulium Fiber Laser: Applications and Advantages of Laser Technology in the Field of Urology.

Authors:  Patrick Rice; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.