Literature DB >> 33655346

Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser.

Dmitry Korolev1, Gagik Akopyan1, Dmitry Tsarichenko1, Anastasia Shpikina2, Stanislav Ali1, Denis Chinenov1, Mariela Corrales3, Mark Taratkin1, Olivier Traxer3, Dmitry Enikeev4.   

Abstract

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser (SP TFL) using different frequency settings. 125 patients with solitary kidney calculi of up to 55 mm in the maximum diameter underwent mini-PCNL with the SP TFL. Stone-free rate, laser-on time, ablation efficacy, energy consumption, ablation speed and complications were all analyzed. Negative low-dose computed tomography scan or asymptomatic patients with stone fragments < 2 mm were the criteria for assessing the stone-free status. In 36 patients (28.8%) low frequency regimens were used (LF: 3-19 Hz-0.5-6 J), in 75 patients (60%) high frequency regimens were chosen (HF: 20-49 Hz-0.2-2 J) and in 14 (11.2%) patients higher frequency (HRF: 50-200 Hz-0.1-0.5 J) regimens were preferred. The mean age was 52 ± 1.8 years. Median stone diameter and median stone volume were larger at low frequency regimens compared to high frequency regimens. Ablation efficacy (J/mm3) was lower at low rather than at high frequency regimens. Ablation speed (mm3/sec) was higher at low compared to high frequency regimens. Surgeons reported minimal and absent retropulsion at higher frequency regimens. The best visibility was observed at high frequency regimens. The overall stone free rate (SFR) at 3 months was 85%. The majority of the postoperative complications were classified between Clavien grades I-II. SP TFL is an effective and safe tool for performing mini-PCNL regardless of the laser settings.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Thulium fiber laser; Urinary stones; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33655346     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-021-01258-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  18 in total

1.  Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.

Authors:  Viktoria Andreeva; Andrey Vinarov; Ilya Yaroslavsky; Anastasia Kovalenko; Alexander Vybornov; Leonid Rapoport; Dmitry Enikeev; Nikolay Sorokin; Alim Dymov; Dmitry Tsarichenko; Petr Glybochko; Nathaniel Fried; Olivier Traxer; Gregory Altshuler; Valentin Gapontsev
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  New technology in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Marie-Claire Rassweiler; Jan Klein
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Measuring stone volume - three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula?

Authors:  William Finch; Richard Johnston; Nadeem Shaida; Andrew Winterbottom; Oliver Wiseman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Association of Patient Age and Gender with Kidney Stone Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Karen L Stern; Tianming Gao; Jodi A Antonelli; Davis P Viprakasit; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Chi; Ben H Chew; Vincent G Bird; Vernon M Pais; Necole M Streeper; Roger L Sur; Stephen Y Nakada; Kristina L Penniston; Sri Sivalingam
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Fragments and dust after Holmium laser lithotripsy with or without "Moses technology": How are they different?

Authors:  Etienne X Keller; Vincent de Coninck; Marie Audouin; Steeve Doizi; Dominique Bazin; Michel Daudon; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.207

6.  Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Dedan Opondo; Francisco P J Daels; Guido Giusti; Alvaro Serrano; Sangam V Kandasami; J Stuart Wolf; Magnus Grabe; Stavros Gravas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Contemporary Practice Patterns of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treating Renal Stones: Results of a Worldwide Survey.

Authors:  Casey A Dauw; Laika Simeon; Abdulrahman F Alruwaily; Francesco Sanguedolce; John M Hollingsworth; William W Roberts; Gary J Faerber; J Stuart Wolf; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

9.  Recent advances in infrared laser lithotripsy [Invited].

Authors:  Nathaniel M Fried
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?

Authors:  Elisa De Lorenzis; Stefano Paolo Zanetti; Luca Boeri; Emanuele Montanari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.