Literature DB >> 34424352

Low-energy high-frequency Ho-YAG lithotripsy: is RIRS going forward? A case-control study.

D Peretti1, E Dalmasso2, A Pecoraro3, C Ambruosi2, F Venzano2, C Fiori3, F Porpiglia3, O Maugeri2.   

Abstract

Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery (RIRS) plays a primary role in renal stone treatment context. Energy, frequency and width of laser impulse can be modulated by surgeons to achieve better outcomes. In our study, patients with single renal stone sized 10-20 mm were retrospectively divided into two groups. Patients of Group 1 underwent RIRS with Low-Energy (LE) High-Frequency (HF) settings using Lumenis® 120-W high-power Ho:YAG laser. Patients of Group 2 (control) underwent RIRS using "standard" settings by means of Sphinx® Jr 30 W Ho:YAG system. Follow-up was conducted with a CT scan at 3 months after RIRS in both groups. Procedure success was defined as stone-free or presence of ≤ 4 mm fragments (Clinical Insignificant Residual Fragments-CIRF). A total number of 199 patients were included: 86 LE/HF RIRS (Group 1) vs 113 "conventional" RIRS (Group 2). Mean operative time was 56.6 (± 19.4) min in Group 1 vs 65.2 (± 25.2) min in Group 2 (p = 0.01). Mean hospitalization time was 2.5 ± 1.7 days for Group 1 vs 2.9 ± 3.2 days for Group 2 (p = 0.2). Peri-operative complications were counted: eight in Group 1 and 11 in Group 2 (p > 0.05). At 3-month control, stone-free rate was 69% (59/86 patients) in Group 1 vs 65% (73/113 patients) in Group 2 (p = 0.6). Success rate was 93% (80/86) in Group 1 in comparison to 82% (93/113) in Group 2 (p = 0.03). In conclusion, LE/HF RIRS seems to be a feasible and effective technique with a reduction of operative time and optimal results in terms of "stone-free" and "success" rates. Further studies are needed to ensure the validity of our results and to give evidence-based statements.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparison; High-frequency; Holmium laser; Lithotripsy; Low-energy; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34424352     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-021-01282-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  3 in total

1.  Ureteroscopic High-Frequency Dusting Utilizing a 120-W Holmium Laser.

Authors:  James Tracey; Galina Gagin; Duncan Morhardt; John Hollingsworth; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the New Stone Age: Dust or Bust?

Authors:  Ali H Aldoukhi; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-09-29
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of low power and high power holmium YAG laser settings in flexible ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Anil Shrestha; Mariela Corrales; Baikuntha Adhikari; Anup Chapagain; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Which Is the Best Laser for Lithotripsy? Holmium Laser.

Authors:  Hyung Joon Kim; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.