Literature DB >> 12692450

Intracorporeal lithotripsy: which modality is best?

Raymond J Leveillee1, Leonid Lobik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A large number of related articles published within the last year were reviewed. Different types of intracorporeal lithotripter devices were compared according to their advantages, disadvantages, efficacy, safety and clinical applications. General directions of future developments are discussed. RECENT
FINDINGS: Ultrasound lithotripters employed through rigid endoscopes provide high fragmentation rates (97-100%) and stone free rate (94%). Clinical evaluation of a new combination ultrasound and pneumatic lithotripter reported an overall stone free rate of 80-89.7%. No major complications were observed. The holmium:YAG (Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet) laser lithotripter is able to destroy all compositions of stone. The stone free rate for ureteral stones is close to 100%. Complications are rare and minimal. Newer wavelengths such as erbium:YAG are currently impractical. There are limited clinical data regarding frequency-doubled double-pulse neodymium:YAG laser lithotripsy.
SUMMARY: Ultrasound lithotripsy is still the preferable modality applied through rigid endoscopes. A new combination of ultrasound and pneumatic impactor includes the advantages of each mode. The holmium:YAG laser lithotripter is the method of choice for flexible endoscopic procedures. Further development of new lithotripters with different energy sources and their combination is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12692450     DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200305000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  12 in total

Review 1.  Lasers in percutaneous renal procedures.

Authors:  Nadya M Cinman; Sero Andonian; Arthur D Smith
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The evolution of lasers in urology.

Authors:  Amir Zarrabi; Andreas J Gross
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

Review 3.  Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osama M Elashry; Ahmad M Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Transurethral holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy for large symptomatic prostatic calculi: initial experience.

Authors:  Neeraj Kumar Goyal; Apul Goel; Satyanarayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Bladder lithiasis: from open surgery to lithotripsy.

Authors:  Athanasios G Papatsoris; Ioannis Varkarakis; Athanasios Dellis; Charalambos Deliveliotis
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-02-10

Review 7.  The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

Review 8.  Clinical significance of residual fragments in 2015: impact, detection, and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Arkadiusz Miernik; Konrad Wilhelm; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Thomas R W Herrmann; Jens J Rassweiler; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Comparison of ultrasonic and pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy techniques during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Tolga Karakan; Akif Diri; Ahmet Metin Hascicek; Berat Cem Ozgur; Serkan Ozcan; Muzaffer Eroglu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-08-18

10.  Safety and efficacy of using the stone cone and an entrapment and extraction device in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric stones.

Authors:  Waleed Shabana; Mohamed Teleb; Tamer Dawod
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.