Literature DB >> 31651523

A 3-Tier Chemotherapy Response Score for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma: Is it Clinically Relevant?

Barrett C Lawson1, Elizabeth D Euscher1, Roland L Bassett2, Jinsong Liu1, Preetha Ramalingam1, YanPing Zhong1,3, Nicole D Fleming4, Anais Malpica1.   

Abstract

The chemotherapy response score (CRS) is used to score histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of patients with extrauterine high-grade serous carcinoma. This study was undertaken to determine if the CRS in the omentum, adnexa or when combined correlates with (1) progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS), (2) laparoscopic score of abdominal disease, (3) Cancer antigen 125 levels, (4) BRCA status, and (5) platinum-resistant disease. A total of 158 cases were retrospectively collected that received NACT between April 2013 and February 2018 at a single institution. The 3-tier Böhm CRS system was applied to the omentum and adnexa. Survival outcomes between scored subgroups were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Spearman rank correlation analyses were used to assess CRS and clinical data. A total of 119 cases were treated only with carboplatin/paclitaxel. Omental CRS was: 1 (23 cases, 19.3%), 2 (65 cases, 54.6%), and 3 (31 cases, 26.1%), whereas adnexal CRS was: 1 (50 cases, 42%), 2 (48 cases, 40.3%) and 3 (21 cases, 17.6%). The omental CRS was significantly associated with PFS as a 2-tier score (hazard ratio [HR]=0.612, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.378-0.989, P=0.045) but not associated with the PFS using the 3-tier score or with OS using either system. Adnexal CRS was not associated with OS but was significantly associated with PFS using the 3-tier (HR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.263-0.914, P=0.025) and 2-tier scores (HR=0.535, 95% CI: 0.297-0.963, P=0.037). The combined score was not associated with OS but was significantly associated with PFS using the 3-tier (HR=0.348, 95% CI: 0.137-0.88, P=0.026) and 2-tier scores (HR=0.364, 95% CI: 0.148-0.896, P=0.028). No CRS system used associated with laparoscopic assessment of disease. CRS in the omentum had no significant association with platinum resistance; however, the adnexal CRS 1/2 were 3 times as likely to develop platinum resistance compared with CRS 3 (relative risk=3.94, 95% CI: 1.03-15.09, P=0.046). The CRS, when used on the omentum, adnexa, and as a combined score, was significantly associated with PFS but not with OS. Adnexal CRS 1/2 are more likely to develop platinum-resistant disease. Therefore, the use of this pathology parameter may be useful for clinical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31651523      PMCID: PMC6954274          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.298


  15 in total

1.  Prospective validation of a laparoscopic predictive model for optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Gabriella Ferrandina; Francesco Fanfani; Giorgia Garganese; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Vito Carone; Maria Giovanna Salerno; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Prognostic Role of Histological Tumor Regression in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Grade Serous Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Edwina Coghlan; Tarek M Meniawy; Aime Munro; Max Bulsara; Colin Jr Stewart; Adeline Tan; M H Eleanor Koay; Daniel MaGee; Jim Codde; Jason Tan; Stuart G Salfinger; Ganendra R Mohan; Yee Leung; Cassandra B Nichols; Paul A Cohen
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Prognostic implications of histological tumor regression (Böhm's score) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade serous tubal & ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Savithri Rajkumar; Alexander Polson; Rahul Nath; Geoffrey Lane; Ahmad Sayasneh; Adam Jakes; Shahina Begum; Gautam Mehra
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  The chemotherapy response score is a useful histological predictor of prognosis in high-grade serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Priya Singh; Vikrant Kaushal; Bhavana Rai; Arvind Rajwanshi; Nalini Gupta; Pranab Dey; Rashi Garg; Manish Rohilla; Vanita Suri; Sushmita Ghoshal; Radhika Srinivasan
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ignace Vergote; Claes G Tropé; Frédéric Amant; Gunnar B Kristensen; Tom Ehlen; Nick Johnson; René H M Verheijen; Maria E L van der Burg; Angel J Lacave; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Gemma G Kenter; Antonio Casado; Cesar Mendiola; Corneel Coens; Leen Verleye; Gavin C E Stuart; Sergio Pecorelli; Nick S Reed
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Steffen Böhm; Asma Faruqi; Ian Said; Michelle Lockley; Elly Brockbank; Arjun Jeyarajah; Amanda Fitzpatrick; Darren Ennis; Thomas Dowe; Jennifer L Santos; Linda S Cook; Anna V Tinker; Nhu D Le; C Blake Gilks; Naveena Singh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Measuring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma: an analysis of the correlation between CT imaging and chemotherapy response score.

Authors:  Meabh McNulty; Adarsh Das; Paul A Cohen; Andrew Dean
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Assessment of a Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) System for Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma (HGSC).

Authors:  Helena M Ditzel; Kyle C Strickland; Emily E Meserve; Elizabeth Stover; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Ursula A Matulonis; Michael G Muto; Joyce F Liu; Colleen Feltmate; Neil Horowitz; Ross S Berkowitz; Mamta Gupta; Jonathan L Hecht; Douglas I Lin; Kirsten M Jochumsen; William R Welch; Michelle S Hirsch; Bradley J Quade; Kenneth R Lee; Christopher P Crum; George L Mutter; Marisa R Nucci; Brooke E Howitt
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.762

9.  The Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS): Interobserver Reproducibility in a Simple and Prognostically Relevant System for Reporting the Histologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tuboovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ian Said; Steffen Böhm; Joanne Beasley; Peter Ellery; Asma Z Faruqi; Raji Ganesan; Lynn Hirschowitz; Sharanpal Jeetle; Sarah Lam Shang Leen; W Glenn McCluggage; Jacqueline McDermott; Reena Merard; Thomas O Millner; Giorgia Trevisan; Jo Vella; C Blake Gilks; Naveena Singh
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.762

10.  Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  William E Winter; G Larry Maxwell; Chunqiao Tian; Jay W Carlson; Robert F Ozols; Peter G Rose; Maurie Markman; Deborah K Armstrong; Franco Muggia; William P McGuire
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

1.  A Modified 2 Tier Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) and Other Histopathologic Features for Predicting Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Extrauterine High-Grade Serous Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yanping Zhong; Jinsong Liu; Xiaoran Li; Shannon N Westin; Anais Malpica; Barrett C Lawson; Sanghoon Lee; Bryan M Fellman; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood; Nicole D Fleming
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Assessing Post-Treatment Pathologic Tumor Response in Female Genital Tract Carcinomas: An Update.

Authors:  Frediano Inzani; Damiano Arciuolo; Giuseppe Angelico; Angela Santoro; Antonio Travaglino; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Giulia Scaglione; Michele Valente; Federica Cianfrini; Antonio Raffone; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  The Evaluation Value of CT in the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Daying Mou; Shengyan Xie; Pingyuan Li
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.009

4.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Liontos; A Andrikopoulou; K Koutsoukos; C Markellos; E Skafida; O Fiste; M Kaparelou; N Thomakos; D Haidopoulos; A Rodolakis; M A Dimopoulos; F Zagouri
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 5.  Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) Assessed on the Adnexa in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Angela Santoro; Antonio Travaglino; Frediano Inzani; Patrizia Straccia; Damiano Arciuolo; Michele Valente; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Giulia Scaglione; Giuseppe Angelico; Alessia Piermattei; Federica Cianfrini; Antonio Raffone; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.