| Literature DB >> 27362902 |
Ian Said1, Steffen Böhm, Joanne Beasley, Peter Ellery, Asma Z Faruqi, Raji Ganesan, Lynn Hirschowitz, Sharanpal Jeetle, Sarah Lam Shang Leen, W Glenn McCluggage, Jacqueline McDermott, Reena Merard, Thomas O Millner, Giorgia Trevisan, Jo Vella, C Blake Gilks, Naveena Singh.
Abstract
A 3-tier histopathologic scoring system, the chemotherapy response score (CRS), was previously devised for reporting the histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in interval debulking surgery specimens of stage IIIc/IV tuboovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. This has been shown to predict the outcome and offer additional information to other methods of assessing the treatment response. In the present study, the reproducibility of this scoring system was assessed by determining the interobserver agreement among reporting pathologists. A total of 5 groups each comprising 3 pathologists with different levels of expertise were selected. The participants underwent an online tutorial on how to apply the CRS system. 40 cases (38 cases in 2 appraiser groups) were scored individually by each of the 15 pathologists. The interobserver reproducibility was calculated using Fleiss' κ, Kendall's coefficient of concordance, and the absolute agreement between (a) individual pathologists within 1 group, (b) with the majority score agreement between all groups, and (c) with all individual scores. The CRS system was found to be highly reproducible among all the pathologists' groups (κ=0.761). The agreement in identifying the group of patients with the best response to chemotherapy was exceptionally high (κ=0.926). We conclude that CRS has a high interobserver reproducibility, especially in identifying the subgroup of patients with the best chemotherapy response, justifying its inclusion in clinical trials and reporting practice.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27362902 DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gynecol Pathol ISSN: 0277-1691 Impact factor: 2.762