Literature DB >> 29750700

Assessment of a Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) System for Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma (HGSC).

Helena M Ditzel1, Kyle C Strickland, Emily E Meserve, Elizabeth Stover, Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos, Ursula A Matulonis, Michael G Muto, Joyce F Liu, Colleen Feltmate, Neil Horowitz, Ross S Berkowitz, Mamta Gupta, Jonathan L Hecht, Douglas I Lin, Kirsten M Jochumsen, William R Welch, Michelle S Hirsch, Bradley J Quade, Kenneth R Lee, Christopher P Crum, George L Mutter, Marisa R Nucci, Brooke E Howitt.   

Abstract

A chemotherapy response score (CRS) system was recently described to assess the histopathologic response and prognosis of patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The current study was performed as an independent assessment of this CRS system. We retrospectively identified advanced stage HGSC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent interval debulking. If available, a hemotoxylin and eosin slide from the omentum and the adnexa was selected for the study. Slides were independently scored by 13 pathologists using the 3-tiered CRS system. Reviewers then received web-based training and rescored the slides. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A total of 68 patients with omental (n=65) and/or adnexal (n=59) slides were included in the study. Interobserver reproducibility was moderate for omentum (κ, 0.48) and poor for adnexa (κ, 0.40), which improved for omentum (κ, 0.62) but not for adnexa (κ, 0.38) after online training. For omental slides, a consensus CRS of 1/2 was associated with a shorter median progression-free survival (10.9 mo; 95% confidence interval, 9-14) than a CRS of 3 (18.9 mo; 95% CI, 18-24; P=0.020). In summary, a 3-tiered CRS system of hemotoxylin and eosin-stained omental deposits can yield prognostic information for HGSC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and web-based training improved reproducibility but did not alter determination of clinical outcomes. The CRS system may allow oncologists to identify potential nonresponders and triage HGSC patients for heightened observation and/or clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29750700     DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   2.762


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of intraoperative peritoneal cytology in interval debulking surgery for pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoki Kojima; Hiroshi Yoshida; Ikumi Kuno; Takashi Uehara; Masaya Uno; Mitsuya Ishikawa; Tomoyasu Kato
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.452

2.  A Modified 2 Tier Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) and Other Histopathologic Features for Predicting Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Extrauterine High-Grade Serous Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yanping Zhong; Jinsong Liu; Xiaoran Li; Shannon N Westin; Anais Malpica; Barrett C Lawson; Sanghoon Lee; Bryan M Fellman; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood; Nicole D Fleming
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Efficacy of neoadjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (the NHIPEC trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Miao-Fang Wu; Li-Juan Wang; Yan-Fang Ye; Chang-Hao Liu; Huai-Wu Lu; Ting-Ting Yao; Bing-Zhong Zhang; Qing Chen; Ji-Bin Li; Yong-Pai Peng; Hui Zhou; Zhong-Qiu Lin; Jing Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Assessing Post-Treatment Pathologic Tumor Response in Female Genital Tract Carcinomas: An Update.

Authors:  Frediano Inzani; Damiano Arciuolo; Giuseppe Angelico; Angela Santoro; Antonio Travaglino; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Giulia Scaglione; Michele Valente; Federica Cianfrini; Antonio Raffone; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  A 3-Tier Chemotherapy Response Score for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma: Is it Clinically Relevant?

Authors:  Barrett C Lawson; Elizabeth D Euscher; Roland L Bassett; Jinsong Liu; Preetha Ramalingam; YanPing Zhong; Nicole D Fleming; Anais Malpica
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.298

6.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Liontos; A Andrikopoulou; K Koutsoukos; C Markellos; E Skafida; O Fiste; M Kaparelou; N Thomakos; D Haidopoulos; A Rodolakis; M A Dimopoulos; F Zagouri
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 7.  Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) Assessed on the Adnexa in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Angela Santoro; Antonio Travaglino; Frediano Inzani; Patrizia Straccia; Damiano Arciuolo; Michele Valente; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Giulia Scaglione; Giuseppe Angelico; Alessia Piermattei; Federica Cianfrini; Antonio Raffone; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.