Literature DB >> 30197060

Prognostic implications of histological tumor regression (Böhm's score) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade serous tubal & ovarian carcinoma.

Savithri Rajkumar1, Alexander Polson2, Rahul Nath3, Geoffrey Lane3, Ahmad Sayasneh3, Adam Jakes4, Shahina Begum5, Gautam Mehra3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Primary objective of this study was to determine prognostic significance of Bohm's histopathological regression score in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for treatment of high grade serous (HGS) tubal & ovarian carcinoma.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received NACT between 2010 and 2015. The 3 point histopathological regression score of Böhm was used to classify chemotherapy response. Survival outcomes between the 3 different subgroups was analysed and compared with standard clinico-pathological variables using the Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank test.
RESULTS: Study cohort comprised 111 patients. Chemotherapy response score (CRS) 3 was observed in 47 (42.4%) and CRS 1and CRS 2 in 22 (19.8%) and 42 (37.8%) women respectively. Women with CRS score of 1 and 2 combined showed a three-fold increased risk of progression on both univariate and multivariate assessment (HR 3.54; C.I 2.19-5.72, p < 0.001). The median overall survival for patients with CRS 1 was 34 months, CRS 2 was 30 months and 47 months for CRS 3. CRS 1 and 2 combined was the only variable that held significance in prediction of reduced overall survival on multivariate assessment (HR 3.26, C.I 1.91-5.54, p 0.0006). CRS 1 and 2 were also associated with 5.15-fold increased risk of relapse within 6 months of completion of chemotherapy (Odds ratio OR 5.15, C.I 0.07-0.47, p - 0.002).
CONCLUSION: CRS is an independent prognosticator of survival and reliable predictor of relapse within 6 months in advanced high grade serous tubal and ovarian carcinoma patients receiving NACT. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy response score; High grade serous carcinoma; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30197060     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  N M de Lange; N P M Ezendam; J S Kwon; I Vandenput; D Mirchandani; F Amant; L J M van der Putten; J M A Pijnenborg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Clinical Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Carcinoma and Exploration of Perioperative Imaging Assessment Parameters.

Authors:  Jiajun Lai; Junsheng Li; Xianwei Mo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Prognostic impact of intraoperative peritoneal cytology in interval debulking surgery for pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoki Kojima; Hiroshi Yoshida; Ikumi Kuno; Takashi Uehara; Masaya Uno; Mitsuya Ishikawa; Tomoyasu Kato
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Pathological Chemotherapy Response Score in Patients Affected by High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: The Prognostic Role of Omental and Ovarian Residual Disease.

Authors:  Angela Santoro; Giuseppe Angelico; Alessia Piermattei; Frediano Inzani; Michele Valente; Damiano Arciuolo; Saveria Spadola; Antonino Mulè; Piercarlo Zorzato; Anna Fagotti; Giovanni Scambia; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  The added value of CA125 normalization before interval debulking surgery to the chemotherapy response score for the prognostication of ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease.

Authors:  Wei-Feng Liang; Li-Juan Wang; Hui Li; Chang-Hao Liu; Miao-Fang Wu; Jing Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  A Modified 2 Tier Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) and Other Histopathologic Features for Predicting Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Extrauterine High-Grade Serous Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yanping Zhong; Jinsong Liu; Xiaoran Li; Shannon N Westin; Anais Malpica; Barrett C Lawson; Sanghoon Lee; Bryan M Fellman; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood; Nicole D Fleming
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Efficacy of neoadjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (the NHIPEC trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Miao-Fang Wu; Li-Juan Wang; Yan-Fang Ye; Chang-Hao Liu; Huai-Wu Lu; Ting-Ting Yao; Bing-Zhong Zhang; Qing Chen; Ji-Bin Li; Yong-Pai Peng; Hui Zhou; Zhong-Qiu Lin; Jing Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  A 3-Tier Chemotherapy Response Score for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma: Is it Clinically Relevant?

Authors:  Barrett C Lawson; Elizabeth D Euscher; Roland L Bassett; Jinsong Liu; Preetha Ramalingam; YanPing Zhong; Nicole D Fleming; Anais Malpica
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.298

9.  Evaluation of Beta-Catenin Subcellular Localization and Water Channel Protein AQP1 Expression as Predictive Markers of Chemo-Resistance in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: Comparative Study between Preoperative Peritoneal Biopsies and Surgical Samples.

Authors:  Giuseppe Angelico; Antonio Ieni; Rosario Caltabiano; Angela Santoro; Frediano Inzani; Saveria Spadola; Giovanni Tuccari; Antonio Macrì; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05

10.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Liontos; A Andrikopoulou; K Koutsoukos; C Markellos; E Skafida; O Fiste; M Kaparelou; N Thomakos; D Haidopoulos; A Rodolakis; M A Dimopoulos; F Zagouri
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.