Literature DB >> 31097511

Measuring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma: an analysis of the correlation between CT imaging and chemotherapy response score.

Meabh McNulty1, Adarsh Das2, Paul A Cohen3, Andrew Dean2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is measured by CT and the decision to proceed with interval surgery is made on the radiological response after two or three cycles of therapy. The Chemotherapy Response Score grades histological tumor regression in omental metastases resected at interval surgery and is associated with progression-free survival and overall survival. It is uncertain whether radiological response is associated with prognosis and whether radiological response predicts Chemotherapy Response Score.To assess if radiological response is associated with progression-free survival and overall survival. Additionally, to investigate whether radiological response predicts the Chemotherapy Response Score.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiological response was assessed by comparing CT imaging at baseline and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) and classified as stable disease, partial response, complete response, or progressive disease. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional-hazard models and the log-rank test.
RESULTS: A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 51 had pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy CT scans available for analysis. Radiological response was not associated with progression-free survival or overall survival on univariate analysis (stable disease vs partial response; HR for progression-free survival 1.15; 95% CI 0.57 to 2.32; p = 0.690; HR for overall survival 1.19; 95% CI 0.57 to 2.46; p = 0.645). In a multivariate model, radiological response was not associated with either progression-free survival (stable disease vs partial response; HR=1.19; 95% CI 0.498 to 2.85; p = 0.694) or overall survival (stable disease vs partial response; HR=0.954; 95% CI 0.38 to 2.40; p = 0.920). There was a significant association between the Chemotherapy Response Score and radiological response (p = 0.005). DISCUSSION: A partial response and stable disease on radiological assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer were not associated with survival, despite having a correlation with the Chemotherapy Response Score. © IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ovarian cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31097511     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  4 in total

1.  Clinically Interpretable Radiomics-Based Prediction of Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Leonardo Rundo; Lucian Beer; Lorena Escudero Sanchez; Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar; Marika Reinius; Cathal McCague; Hilal Sahin; Vlad Bura; Roxana Pintican; Marta Zerunian; Stephan Ursprung; Iris Allajbeu; Helen Addley; Paula Martin-Gonzalez; Thomas Buddenkotte; Naveena Singh; Anju Sahdev; Ionut-Gabriel Funingana; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Florian Markowetz; James D Brenton; Evis Sala; Ramona Woitek
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  A 3-Tier Chemotherapy Response Score for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma: Is it Clinically Relevant?

Authors:  Barrett C Lawson; Elizabeth D Euscher; Roland L Bassett; Jinsong Liu; Preetha Ramalingam; YanPing Zhong; Nicole D Fleming; Anais Malpica
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.298

3.  Nadir CA-125 serum levels during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and no residual tumor at interval debulking surgery predict prognosis in advanced stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kazuto Nakamura; Yoshikazu Kitahara; Toshio Nishimura; Soichi Yamashita; Keiko Kigure; Ikuro Ito; Tatsuya Kanuma
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 4.  Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) Assessed on the Adnexa in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Angela Santoro; Antonio Travaglino; Frediano Inzani; Patrizia Straccia; Damiano Arciuolo; Michele Valente; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Giulia Scaglione; Giuseppe Angelico; Alessia Piermattei; Federica Cianfrini; Antonio Raffone; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.