Literature DB >> 31635848

Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.

Melinda M Davis1, Siddhartha Nambiar2, Maria E Mayorga2, Eliana Sullivan3, Karen Hicklin4, Meghan C O'Leary5, Kristen Dillon6, Kristen Hassmiller Lich5, Yifan Gu7, Bonnie K Lind8, Stephanie B Wheeler9.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be effectively prevented or detected with guideline concordant screening, yet Medicaid enrollees experience disparities. We used microsimulation to project CRC screening patterns, CRC cases averted, and life-years gained in the population of 68,077 Oregon Medicaid enrollees 50-64 over a five year period starting in January 2019. The simulation estimated the cost-effectiveness of five intervention scenarios - academic detailing plus provider audit and feedback (Detailing+), patient reminders (Reminders), mailing a Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) directly to the patient's home (Mailed FIT), patient navigation (Navigation), and mailed FIT with Navigation (Mailed FIT + Navigation) - compared to usual care. Each intervention scenario raised CRC screening rates compared to usual care, with improvements as high as 11.6 percentage points (Mailed FIT + Navigation) and as low as 2.5 percentage points (Reminders) after one year. Compared to usual care, Mailed FIT + Navigation would raise CRC screening rates 20.2 percentage points after five years - averting nearly 77 cancer cases (a reduction of 113 per 100,000) and exceeding national screening targets. Over a five year period, Reminders, Mailed FIT and Mailed FIT + Navigation were expected to be cost effective if stakeholders were willing to pay $230 or less per additional year up-to-date (at a cost of $22, $59, and $227 respectively), whereas Detailing+ and Navigation were more costly for the same benefits. To approach national CRC screening targets, health system stakeholders are encouraged to implement Mailed FIT with or without Navigation and Reminders.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer prevention & control; Colorectal cancer; Disparities; Implementation; Intervention selection; Medicaid; Screening; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31635848      PMCID: PMC6934075          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  46 in total

1.  The MISCAN-COLON simulation model for the evaluation of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  F Loeve; R Boer; G J van Oortmarssen; M van Ballegooijen; J D Habbema
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1999-02

2.  United States life tables, 2002.

Authors:  Elizabeth Arias
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2004-11-10

3.  Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Djenaba A Joseph; Diana Redwood; Amy DeGroff; Emily L Butler
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2016-02-12

4.  Effect of Medicaid Expansion on Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates.

Authors:  Yasmin A Zerhouni; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Stuart Lipsitz; Joel Goldberg; Jennifer Irani; Ronald Bleday; Adil H Haider; Nelya Melnitchouk
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Stephanie Renfro; Robyn Pham; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jackilen Shannon; Gloria D Coronado; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Sandra Lisboa; A Naomie Casimir; Lisa Valley-Shah; Karen M Emmons; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-23

7.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Colorectal cancer screening in the United States: Trends from 2008 to 2015 and variation by health insurance coverage.

Authors:  Janet S de Moor; Robin A Cohen; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Susan A Sabatino; K Robin Yabroff; Stacey Fedewa; Richard Lee; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cheryl Altice; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Microsimulation Modeling for Health Decision Sciences Using R: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Eline M Krijkamp; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Eva A Enns; Hawre J Jalal; M G Myriam Hunink; Petros Pechlivanoglou
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Does a transition to accountable care in Medicaid shift the modality of colorectal cancer testing?

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Paul Shafer; Stephanie Renfro; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jackilen Shannon; Gloria D Coronado; K John McConnell; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda F Petrik; Edward J Miech; Brittany Younger; Anne L Escaron; Jennifer S Rivelli; Jamie H Thompson; Denis Nyongesa; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Estimating the impact of insurance expansion on colorectal cancer and related costs in North Carolina: A population-level simulation analysis.

Authors:  Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Meghan C O'Leary; Siddhartha Nambiar; Rachel M Townsley; Maria E Mayorga; Karen Hicklin; Leah Frerichs; Paul R Shafer; Melinda M Davis; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Source matters: a survey of cost variation for fecal immunochemical tests in primary care.

Authors:  Jennifer Coury; Katrina Ramsey; Rose Gunn; Jon Judkins; Melinda Davis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Mailed fecal testing and patient navigation versus usual care to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up colonoscopy in rural Medicaid enrollees: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Michael C Leo; Katrina Ramsey; Jennifer Coury; Amanda F Petrik; Mary Patzel; Erin S Kenzie; Jamie H Thompson; Erik Brodt; Raj Mummadi; Nancy Elder; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-04-13

5.  Development of a Computer-Tailored Intervention/Decision Aid To Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Systems.

Authors:  Hala Fatima; Maryiam Wajid; Connie Krier; Victoria Champion; Lisa Carter-Harris; Rivienne Shedd-Steele; Thomas F Imperiale; Peter Schwartz; Sylvia Strom; Mark Magnarella; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-21

6.  Extending analytic methods for economic evaluation in implementation science.

Authors:  Meghan C O'Leary; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Leah Frerichs; Jennifer Leeman; Daniel S Reuland; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 7.960

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Outreach Strategies for Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Medicaid Population.

Authors:  Jordan J Karlitz; A Mark Fendrick; Jay Bhatt; Gloria D Coronado; Sushanth Jeyakumar; Nathaniel J Smith; Marcus Plescia; Durado Brooks; Paul Limburg; David Lieberman
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.290

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.