Literature DB >> 29587047

Microsimulation Modeling for Health Decision Sciences Using R: A Tutorial.

Eline M Krijkamp1, Fernando Alarid-Escudero2, Eva A Enns2, Hawre J Jalal3, M G Myriam Hunink1,4,5, Petros Pechlivanoglou6,7.   

Abstract

Microsimulation models are becoming increasingly common in the field of decision modeling for health. Because microsimulation models are computationally more demanding than traditional Markov cohort models, the use of computer programming languages in their development has become more common. R is a programming language that has gained recognition within the field of decision modeling. It has the capacity to perform microsimulation models more efficiently than software commonly used for decision modeling, incorporate statistical analyses within decision models, and produce more transparent models and reproducible results. However, no clear guidance for the implementation of microsimulation models in R exists. In this tutorial, we provide a step-by-step guide to build microsimulation models in R and illustrate the use of this guide on a simple, but transferable, hypothetical decision problem. We guide the reader through the necessary steps and provide generic R code that is flexible and can be adapted for other models. We also show how this code can be extended to address more complex model structures and provide an efficient microsimulation approach that relies on vectorization solutions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov model; R project; decision-analytic modeling; microsimulation; open source software

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29587047      PMCID: PMC6349385          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X18754513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  25 in total

1.  Modeling the Outcome of Systematic TPMT Genotyping or Phenotyping Before Azathioprine Prescription: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Zarca; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Marie-Anne Loriot; Gilles Chatellier; Nicolas Pallet
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  A cost-utility analysis of atezolizumab in the second-line treatment of patients with metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  A Parmar; M Richardson; P C Coyte; S Cheng; B Sander; K K W Chan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  A Multidimensional Array Representation of State-Transition Model Dynamics.

Authors:  Eline M Krijkamp; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Eva A Enns; Petros Pechlivanoglou; M G Myriam Hunink; Alan Yang; Hawre J Jalal
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Siddhartha Nambiar; Maria E Mayorga; Eliana Sullivan; Karen Hicklin; Meghan C O'Leary; Kristen Dillon; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Yifan Gu; Bonnie K Lind; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Cost-effectiveness of direct surgery versus preoperative octreotide therapy for growth-hormone secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Shaun J Kilty; Myriam G M Hunink; Lisa Caulley; Eline Krijkamp; Mary-Anne Doyle; Kednapa Thavorn; Fahad Alkherayf; Nick Sahlollbey; Selina X Dong; Jason Quinn; Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki; David Schramm
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  The health and economic impact of the Tobacco 21 Law in El Paso County, Texas: A modeling study.

Authors:  Whitney Garney; Sonya Panjwani; Laura King; Joan Enderle; Dara O'Neil; Yan Li
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Microsimulation Model Calibration with Approximate Bayesian Computation in R: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Peter Shewmaker; Stavroula A Chrysanthopoulou; Rowan Iskandar; Derek Lake; Earic Jutkowitz
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.749

8.  Nonidentifiability in Model Calibration and Implications for Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Richard F MacLehose; Yadira Peralta; Karen M Kuntz; Eva A Enns
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Bayesian versus Empirical Calibration of Microsimulation Models: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Stavroula A Chrysanthopoulou; Carolyn M Rutter; Constantine A Gatsonis
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.749

10.  Assess the Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of LACE and HOSPITAL Re-Admission Prediction Models as a Risk Management Tool for Home Care Patients: An Evaluation Study of a Medical Center Affiliated Home Care Unit in Taiwan.

Authors:  Mei-Chin Su; Yi-Jen Wang; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Shiao-Hui Chiu; Hsiao-Ting Chang; Mei-Shu Huang; Li-Hui Hu; Chu-Chuan Li; Su-Ju Yang; Jau-Ching Wu; Yu-Chun Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.