Literature DB >> 28506715

Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.

Melinda M Davis1, Stephanie Renfro2, Robyn Pham3, Kristen Hassmiller Lich4, Jackilen Shannon5, Gloria D Coronado6, Stephanie B Wheeler7.   

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) can be attenuated through guideline concordant screening and intervention. This study used Medicaid and commercial claims data to examine individual and geographic factors associated with CRC testing rates in one state (Oregon). A total of 64,711 beneficiaries (4516 Medicaid; 60,195 Commercial) became newly age-eligible for CRC screening and met inclusion criteria (e.g., continuously enrolled, no prior history) during the study period (January 2010-December 2013). We estimated multilevel models to examine predictors for CRC testing, including individual (e.g., gender, insurance, rurality, access to care, distance to endoscopy facility) and geographic factors at the county level (e.g., poverty, uninsurance). Despite insurance coverage, only two out of five (42%) beneficiaries had evidence of CRC testing during the four year study window. CRC testing varied from 22.4% to 46.8% across Oregon's 36 counties; counties with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation had lower levels of testing. After controlling for age, beneficiaries had greater odds of receiving CRC testing if they were female (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), commercially insured, or urban residents (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.21). Accessing primary care (OR 2.47, 95% CI 2.37-2.57), but not distance to endoscopy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03) was associated with testing. CRC testing in newly age-eligible Medicaid and commercial members remains markedly low. Disparities exist by gender, geographic residence, insurance coverage, and access to primary care. Work remains to increase CRC testing to acceptable levels, and to select and implement interventions targeting the counties and populations in greatest need.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Geographic information systems; Health disparity; Multilevel analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28506715      PMCID: PMC6067672          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  66 in total

1.  Revisiting Robinson: the perils of individualistic and ecologic fallacy.

Authors:  S V Subramanian; Kelvyn Jones; Afamia Kaddour; Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Feasibility and efficacy of pairing fecal immunochemical testing with mammography for increasing colorectal cancer screening among uninsured Latinas in northern Manhattan.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Charles E Basch; Karen M Schmitt; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Measurement of colorectal cancer test use with medical claims data in a safety-net health system.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Liyue Tong; Paula Anderson; Bonnie Rose; Elizabeth Carter; Mark Koch; Keith Argenbright; Chul Ahn; James Allison; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.378

Review 4.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer and Evolving Issues for Physicians and Patients: A Review.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Uri Ladabaum; Marcia Cruz-Correa; Carla Ginsburg; John M Inadomi; Lawrence S Kim; Francis M Giardiello; Richard C Wender
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; William Kreuter; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002 Dec 9-23

6.  Patient preferences for colon cancer screening.

Authors:  M Pignone; D Bucholtz; R Harris
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  An innovative strategy to reach the underserved for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Katherine Josa Briant; Noah Espinoza; Avigail Galvan; Elizabeth Carosso; Nathan Marchello; Sandra Linde; Wade Copeland; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Meta-analyses of colorectal cancer risk factors.

Authors:  Constance M Johnson; Caimiao Wei; Joe E Ensor; Derek J Smolenski; Christopher I Amos; Bernard Levin; Donald A Berry
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Spatial Heterogeneity in Cancer Control Planning and Cancer Screening Behavior.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; Sujha Subramanian; Lisa Watson; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Ann Assoc Am Geogr       Date:  2012

10.  Urban-rural disparities in colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of 1998-2005 data from the Centers for Disease Control's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Authors:  Allison M Cole; J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark Doescher
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  40 in total

Review 1.  Data-Powered Participatory Decision Making: Leveraging Systems Thinking and Simulation to Guide Selection and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Jennifer Leeman; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Florence K L Tangka; Melinda M Davis; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Providing Higher Resolution Indicators of Rurality in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database: Implications for Patient Privacy and Research.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; David G Stinchcomb; Mandi Yu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Trends in Mortality Due to Cancer in the United States by Age and County-Level Income, 1999-2015.

Authors:  Diana R Withrow; Amy Berrington de González; Susan Spillane; Neal D Freedman; Ana F Best; Yingxi Chen; Meredith S Shiels
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Siddhartha Nambiar; Maria E Mayorga; Eliana Sullivan; Karen Hicklin; Meghan C O'Leary; Kristen Dillon; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Yifan Gu; Bonnie K Lind; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Colorectal cancer knowledge and screening adherence among low-income Hispanic employees.

Authors:  Judy Y Ou; Echo L Warner; Gina E Nam; Laura Martel; Sara Carbajal-Salisbury; Vicky Fuentes; David W Wetter; Anne C Kirchhoff; Deanna Kepka
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2019-08-01

6.  Correlates of non-adherence to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among screen-eligible women: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Mandana Vahabi; Aisha K Lofters; Alexander Kopp; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  "Taking the Bull by the Horns": Four Principles to Align Public Health, Primary Care, and Community Efforts to Improve Rural Cancer Control.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Public perception of predictive cancer genetic testing and research in Oregon.

Authors:  Teala W Alvord; Lisa K Marriott; Phuc T Nguyen; Autumn Shafer; Kim Brown; Wesley Stoller; Jennifer L Volpi; Jill Vandehey-Guerrero; Laura K Ferrara; Steven Blakesley; Erin Solomon; Hannah Kuehl; Amy J Palma; Paige E Farris; Kelly J Hamman; Madisen Cotter; Jackilen Shannon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Initiation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Enrollees.

Authors:  Cynthia M Mojica; Savannah M Bradley; Bonnie K Lind; Yifan Gu; Gloria D Coronado; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminders with and without fecal immunochemical tests for Medicaid beneficiaries at a large county health department: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alison T Brenner; Jewels Rhode; Jeff Y Yang; Dana Baker; Rebecca Drechsel; Marcus Plescia; Daniel S Reuland; Tom Wroth; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.